| Message ID | 1484159512-28515-2-git-send-email-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 9:31:51 PM CET Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c > index 9afcbf7..0995ab3 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > > /* Set dma_ops for dev, otherwise it would be dummy_dma_ops */ > - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, DMA_BIT_MASK(32), NULL, false); > + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, DMA_BIT_MASK(32), false, NULL, false); > > dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > index c9b7ad6..19f70d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c > @@ -2533,7 +2533,7 @@ static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > priv->buf_layout[TX].priv_data_size = DPAA_TX_PRIV_DATA_SIZE; /* Tx */ > > /* device used for DMA mapping */ > - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL, false); > + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, false); > err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); > if (err) { > dev_err(dev, "dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() failed\n"); > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, > > /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ > if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) > - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); > + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); > > /* > * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c > index fd5cfad..1cc2115 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/device.c > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) > bool coherent; > unsigned long offset; > const struct iommu_ops *iommu; > + bool enforce_range = false; > > /* > * Set default coherent_dma_mask to 32 bit. Drivers are expected to > @@ -126,6 +127,8 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) > return; > } > dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset); > + > + enforce_range = true; > } > > dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset; Hmm, I think when the dma-ranges are missing, we should either enforce a 32-bit mask, or disallow DMA completely. It's probably too late for the latter, I wish we had done this earlier in order to force everyone on ARM64 to have a valid dma-ranges property for any DMA master. Arnd
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, >> >> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ >> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) >> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); >> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); >> >> /* >> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() > > Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first > place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range should be definitely enforced. >> @@ -126,6 +127,8 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) >> return; >> } >> dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset); >> + >> + enforce_range = true; >> } >> >> dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset; > > Hmm, I think when the dma-ranges are missing, we should either enforce > a 32-bit mask, or disallow DMA completely. It's probably too late for > the latter, I wish we had done this earlier in order to force everyone > on ARM64 to have a valid dma-ranges property for any DMA master. This can be done over time. However the very idea of this version of patch is - keep working pieces as-is, thus for now setting enforce_range to false in case of no defined dma-ranges is intentional. What I should re-check is - does rcar dtsi set dma-ranges, and add it if it does not. Nikita
12.01.2017 08:52, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, >>> >>> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ >>> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) >>> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); >>> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); >>> >>> /* >>> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() >> >> Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first >> place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? > > I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds > argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range > should be definitely enforced. > >>> @@ -126,6 +127,8 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) >>> return; >>> } >>> dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset); >>> + >>> + enforce_range = true; >>> } >>> >>> dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset; >> >> Hmm, I think when the dma-ranges are missing, we should either enforce >> a 32-bit mask, or disallow DMA completely. It's probably too late for >> the latter, I wish we had done this earlier in order to force everyone >> on ARM64 to have a valid dma-ranges property for any DMA master. > > This can be done over time. > > However the very idea of this version of patch is - keep working pieces > as-is, thus for now setting enforce_range to false in case of no defined > dma-ranges is intentional. What we can do is - check bus width (as it is defined in DT) and set enforce_range to true if bus is 32-bit > What I should re-check is - does rcar dtsi set dma-ranges, and add it if > it does not. It does not, will have to add. In DT bus is defined as 64-bit. But looks like physically it is 32-bit. Maybe DT needs fixing.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:52:51AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > >> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > >> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, > >> > >> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ > >> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) > >> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); > >> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); > >> > >> /* > >> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() > > > > Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first > > place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? > > I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds > argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range > should be definitely enforced. I also wouldn't lose any sleep over a staging driver. Will
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:16:24 PM CET Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:52:51AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > > >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > > >> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c > > >> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, > > >> > > >> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ > > >> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) > > >> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); > > >> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); > > >> > > >> /* > > >> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() > > > > > > Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first > > > place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? > > > > I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds > > argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range > > should be definitely enforced. > > I also wouldn't lose any sleep over a staging driver. I think this is in the process of being moved out of staging, and my question was about the other two as well: drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c Arnd
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:33:32 AM CET Nikita Yushchenko wrote: > >> Hmm, I think when the dma-ranges are missing, we should either enforce > >> a 32-bit mask, or disallow DMA completely. It's probably too late for > >> the latter, I wish we had done this earlier in order to force everyone > >> on ARM64 to have a valid dma-ranges property for any DMA master. > > > > This can be done over time. > > > > However the very idea of this version of patch is - keep working pieces > > as-is, thus for now setting enforce_range to false in case of no defined > > dma-ranges is intentional. > > What we can do is - check bus width (as it is defined in DT) and set > enforce_range to true if bus is 32-bit > > > What I should re-check is - does rcar dtsi set dma-ranges, and add it if > > it does not. > > It does not, will have to add. > > In DT bus is defined as 64-bit. But looks like physically it is 32-bit. > Maybe DT needs fixing. I think we always assumed that the lack of a dma-ranges property implied a 32-bit width, as that is the safe fallback as well as the most common case. AFAICT, this means you are actually fine on rcar, and all other platforms will keep working as we enforce it, but might get slowed down if they relied on the unintended behavior of allowing 64-bit DMA. Arnd
>>>> Hmm, I think when the dma-ranges are missing, we should either enforce >>>> a 32-bit mask, or disallow DMA completely. It's probably too late for >>>> the latter, I wish we had done this earlier in order to force everyone >>>> on ARM64 to have a valid dma-ranges property for any DMA master. >>> >>> This can be done over time. >>> >>> However the very idea of this version of patch is - keep working pieces >>> as-is, thus for now setting enforce_range to false in case of no defined >>> dma-ranges is intentional. >> >> What we can do is - check bus width (as it is defined in DT) and set >> enforce_range to true if bus is 32-bit >> >>> What I should re-check is - does rcar dtsi set dma-ranges, and add it if >>> it does not. >> >> It does not, will have to add. >> >> In DT bus is defined as 64-bit. But looks like physically it is 32-bit. >> Maybe DT needs fixing. > > I think we always assumed that the lack of a dma-ranges property > implied a 32-bit width, as that is the safe fallback as well as the > most common case. Yes we assumed that, but that was combined with blindly accepting wider dma_mask per driver's request. Later is being changed. > AFAICT, this means you are actually fine on rcar, and all other > platforms will keep working as we enforce it, but might get slowed > down if they relied on the unintended behavior of allowing 64-bit > DMA. Yesterday Robin raised issue that a change starting to enforce default dma_mask will break existing setups - i.e. those that depend in 64bit DMA being implicitly supported without manually declaring such support. In reply to that, I suggested this version of patchset that should keep existing behavior by default. I'm fine with both approaches regarding behavior on hw that I don't have - but I'm not in position to make any decisions on that.
On 12/01/17 13:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:16:24 PM CET Will Deacon wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:52:51AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote: >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>>>> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c >>>>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, >>>>> >>>>> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ >>>>> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) >>>>> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); >>>>> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); >>>>> >>>>> /* >>>>> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add() >>>> >>>> Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first >>>> place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node? >>> >>> I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds >>> argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range >>> should be definitely enforced. >> >> I also wouldn't lose any sleep over a staging driver. > > I think this is in the process of being moved out of staging, and > my question was about the other two as well: The fsl-mc is actually a sort-of-bus-controller probing and configuring its (directly DMA-capable) child devices, so is in fact legitimate here. > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c That one is completely bogus, and should just go away. > drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c That one is part of some ugly trickery involving creating a fake device to represent multiple separate IOMMU devices. The driver could probably be reworked to not need it (the Exynos IOMMU handles a similar situation without such tricks), but it's non-trivial. Robin. > > Arnd >
Hi Nikita,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170112]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nikita-Yushchenko/dma-mapping-let-arch-know-origin-of-dma-range-passed-to-arch_setup_dma_ops/20170113-152733
config: x86_64-randconfig-u0-01131618 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/acpi/scan.c: In function 'acpi_dma_configure':
>> drivers/acpi/scan.c:1388:2: error: too many arguments to function 'arch_setup_dma_ops'
arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, false, iommu,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/acpi/scan.c:15:0:
include/linux/dma-mapping.h:611:20: note: declared here
static inline void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/arch_setup_dma_ops +1388 drivers/acpi/scan.c
1382 iommu = iort_iommu_configure(dev);
1383
1384 /*
1385 * Assume dma valid range starts at 0 and covers the whole
1386 * coherent_dma_mask.
1387 */
> 1388 arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, false, iommu,
1389 attr == DEV_DMA_COHERENT);
1390 }
1391 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dma_configure);
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h index bf02dbd..2a3863e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static inline unsigned long dma_max_pfn(struct device *dev) #define arch_setup_dma_ops arch_setup_dma_ops extern void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, + bool enforce_range, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent); #define arch_teardown_dma_ops arch_teardown_dma_ops diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c index ab77100..b8b11f8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c @@ -2380,7 +2380,8 @@ static struct dma_map_ops *arm_get_dma_map_ops(bool coherent) } void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, - const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent) + bool enforce_range, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, + bool coherent) { struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops; diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h index ccea82c..ae1c23f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ static inline struct dma_map_ops *get_dma_ops(struct device *dev) } void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, - const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent); + bool enforce_range, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, + bool coherent); #define arch_setup_dma_ops arch_setup_dma_ops #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c index e040827..ea295f1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c @@ -953,7 +953,8 @@ static void __iommu_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA */ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, - const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent) + bool enforce_range, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, + bool coherent) { if (!dev->archdata.dma_ops) dev->archdata.dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops; diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-mapping.h index 7aa71b9..6af4d87 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-mapping.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-mapping.h @@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ extern void dma_cache_sync(struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size, #define arch_setup_dma_ops arch_setup_dma_ops static inline void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, - u64 size, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, + u64 size, bool enforce_range, + const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent) { #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_PERDEV_COHERENT diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 1926918..dea17a5 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ void acpi_dma_configure(struct device *dev, enum dev_dma_attr attr) * Assume dma valid range starts at 0 and covers the whole * coherent_dma_mask. */ - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, iommu, + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1, false, iommu, attr == DEV_DMA_COHERENT); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dma_configure); diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c index 9afcbf7..0995ab3 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static int rk_iommu_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENOMEM; /* Set dma_ops for dev, otherwise it would be dummy_dma_ops */ - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, DMA_BIT_MASK(32), NULL, false); + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, DMA_BIT_MASK(32), false, NULL, false); dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c index c9b7ad6..19f70d8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c @@ -2533,7 +2533,7 @@ static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->buf_layout[TX].priv_data_size = DPAA_TX_PRIV_DATA_SIZE; /* Tx */ /* device used for DMA mapping */ - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, NULL, false); + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, false); err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); if (err) { dev_err(dev, "dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() failed\n"); diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c index fd5cfad..1cc2115 100644 --- a/drivers/of/device.c +++ b/drivers/of/device.c @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) bool coherent; unsigned long offset; const struct iommu_ops *iommu; + bool enforce_range = false; /* * Set default coherent_dma_mask to 32 bit. Drivers are expected to @@ -126,6 +127,8 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) return; } dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset); + + enforce_range = true; } dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset; @@ -147,7 +150,7 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sbehind an iommu\n", iommu ? " " : " not "); - arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_addr, size, iommu, coherent); + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_addr, size, enforce_range, iommu, coherent); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_configure); diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c index 5ac373c..480b644 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc, /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */ if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY)) - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true); + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true); /* * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add()
There are cases when device is capable of wide DMA mask (and driver issues corresponding dma_set_mask() call), but bus device sits on can't support wide address. Example: NVMe device behind PCIe controller sitting on 32-bit SoC bus. To support such case, architecture needs information about such limitations. Such information can originate from dma-ranges property in device tree, and is passed to architecture via arch_setup_dma_ops() call. Problem is that in wide majority of cases, no dma range is defined. E.g. ACPI has no means to define it. Thus default range (usually full 32-bit range, i.e. 4G starting at zero address) is passed instead. If architecture enforce this range, all setups currently using wide DMA addresses without explicitly defining support for that via device tree will break. This is bad, especially for ACPI based platforms. To avoid that, this patch adds additional boolean argument to arch_setup_dma_ops() to show if range originates from authorative source and thus should be enforced, or is just a guess and should be handled as such. Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 1 + arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++- arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 ++- arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++- arch/mips/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 ++- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +- drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c | 2 +- drivers/of/device.c | 5 ++++- drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c | 2 +- 10 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)