| Message ID | 20170124012548.12603-2-robert@sixbynine.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 24 January 2017 at 01:25, Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> wrote: > If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least > I can do is not muddle the comment up too. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c index a1b7eec58be2..b0eec762b9b4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream, * userspace. * * Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the - * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad + * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad * and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the * Gen PRM naming convention. *
If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least I can do is not muddle the comment up too. Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)