Message ID | 20161216052040.53067-2-haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Dears, We would like to know if this patch will be pulled into upstream or what else we need to do for it? Because for upstream, the qemu-iotests case 055 still failed. Thanks. Jing On 12/16/2016 01:20 PM, QingFeng Hao wrote: > The problem was triggered by qemu-iotests case 055. It failed when it > was comparing the compressed vmdk image with original test.img. > > The cause is that buf_len in vmdk_write_extent wasn't converted to > little-endian before it was stored to disk. But later vmdk_read_extent > read it and converted it from little-endian to cpu endian. > If the cpu is big-endian like s390, the problem will happen and > the data length read by vmdk_read_extent will become invalid! > The fix is to add the conversion in vmdk_write_extent, meanwhile, > repair the endianness problem of lba field which shall also be converted > to little-endian before storing to disk. > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <liujbjl@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > --- > block/vmdk.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c > index a11c27a..26e5f95 100644 > --- a/block/vmdk.c > +++ b/block/vmdk.c > @@ -1354,8 +1354,8 @@ static int vmdk_write_extent(VmdkExtent *extent, int64_t cluster_offset, > goto out; > } > > - data->lba = offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS; > - data->size = buf_len; > + data->lba = cpu_to_le64(offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS); > + data->size = cpu_to_le32(buf_len); > > n_bytes = buf_len + sizeof(VmdkGrainMarker); > iov = (struct iovec) {
On Mon, 01/16 10:38, liujing wrote: > Dears, > > We would like to know if this patch will be pulled > > into upstream or what else we need to do for it? > > Because for upstream, the qemu-iotests case 055 still failed. Kevin, would you like to take this or should I do it? Fam > > Thanks. > > Jing > > > On 12/16/2016 01:20 PM, QingFeng Hao wrote: > > The problem was triggered by qemu-iotests case 055. It failed when it > > was comparing the compressed vmdk image with original test.img. > > > > The cause is that buf_len in vmdk_write_extent wasn't converted to > > little-endian before it was stored to disk. But later vmdk_read_extent > > read it and converted it from little-endian to cpu endian. > > If the cpu is big-endian like s390, the problem will happen and > > the data length read by vmdk_read_extent will become invalid! > > The fix is to add the conversion in vmdk_write_extent, meanwhile, > > repair the endianness problem of lba field which shall also be converted > > to little-endian before storing to disk. > > > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > > Signed-off-by: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <liujbjl@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > > --- > > block/vmdk.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c > > index a11c27a..26e5f95 100644 > > --- a/block/vmdk.c > > +++ b/block/vmdk.c > > @@ -1354,8 +1354,8 @@ static int vmdk_write_extent(VmdkExtent *extent, int64_t cluster_offset, > > goto out; > > } > > > > - data->lba = offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS; > > - data->size = buf_len; > > + data->lba = cpu_to_le64(offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS); > > + data->size = cpu_to_le32(buf_len); > > > > n_bytes = buf_len + sizeof(VmdkGrainMarker); > > iov = (struct iovec) { > >
On Mon, 01/16 13:26, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Mon, 01/16 10:38, liujing wrote: > > Dears, > > > > We would like to know if this patch will be pulled > > > > into upstream or what else we need to do for it? > > > > Because for upstream, the qemu-iotests case 055 still failed. > > Kevin, would you like to take this or should I do it? Adding Max since he's taking care of the other VMDK fix I posted. Fam
On 16.12.2016 06:20, QingFeng Hao wrote: > The problem was triggered by qemu-iotests case 055. It failed when it > was comparing the compressed vmdk image with original test.img. > > The cause is that buf_len in vmdk_write_extent wasn't converted to > little-endian before it was stored to disk. But later vmdk_read_extent > read it and converted it from little-endian to cpu endian. > If the cpu is big-endian like s390, the problem will happen and > the data length read by vmdk_read_extent will become invalid! > The fix is to add the conversion in vmdk_write_extent, meanwhile, > repair the endianness problem of lba field which shall also be converted > to little-endian before storing to disk. > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <liujbjl@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > --- > block/vmdk.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks, I've applied the patch to my block tree: https://github.com/XanClic/qemu/commits/block Max
在 2017-01-26 0:25, Max Reitz 写道: > On 16.12.2016 06:20, QingFeng Hao wrote: >> The problem was triggered by qemu-iotests case 055. It failed when it >> was comparing the compressed vmdk image with original test.img. >> >> The cause is that buf_len in vmdk_write_extent wasn't converted to >> little-endian before it was stored to disk. But later vmdk_read_extent >> read it and converted it from little-endian to cpu endian. >> If the cpu is big-endian like s390, the problem will happen and >> the data length read by vmdk_read_extent will become invalid! >> The fix is to add the conversion in vmdk_write_extent, meanwhile, >> repair the endianness problem of lba field which shall also be converted >> to little-endian before storing to disk. >> >> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org >> Signed-off-by: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <liujbjl@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> >> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> >> --- >> block/vmdk.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Thanks, I've applied the patch to my block tree: > > https://github.com/XanClic/qemu/commits/block Thanks Max! > > Max >
diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c index a11c27a..26e5f95 100644 --- a/block/vmdk.c +++ b/block/vmdk.c @@ -1354,8 +1354,8 @@ static int vmdk_write_extent(VmdkExtent *extent, int64_t cluster_offset, goto out; } - data->lba = offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS; - data->size = buf_len; + data->lba = cpu_to_le64(offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS); + data->size = cpu_to_le32(buf_len); n_bytes = buf_len + sizeof(VmdkGrainMarker); iov = (struct iovec) {