| Message ID | 1485222528-20603-1-git-send-email-spjoshi@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon 23 Jan 17:48 PST 2017, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in > rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of > in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking > around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the > rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> I moved the rproc_delete_debug_dir() below the list_del() region to allow reuse of the critical region in the upcoming "deleted" patch. Applied, thank you. Regards, Bjorn > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 953ee29..78200a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) > > dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name); > > - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); > - > idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids); > > if (rproc->index >= 0) > @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) > if (rproc->auto_boot) > rproc_shutdown(rproc); > > + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); > + > /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */ > mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); > list_del(&rproc->node); > -- > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >
On Mon 30 Jan 14:01 PST 2017, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 23 Jan 17:48 PST 2017, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: > > > The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in > > rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of > > in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking > > around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the > > rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> > > I moved the rproc_delete_debug_dir() below the list_del() region to > allow reuse of the critical region in the upcoming "deleted" patch. > Never mind, I failed at reading. I re-applied this as is. Regards, Bjorn > Applied, thank you. > > Regards, > Bjorn > > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > index 953ee29..78200a7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > > @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) > > > > dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name); > > > > - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); > > - > > idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids); > > > > if (rproc->index >= 0) > > @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) > > if (rproc->auto_boot) > > rproc_shutdown(rproc); > > > > + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); > > + > > /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */ > > mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); > > list_del(&rproc->node); > > -- > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > >
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 953ee29..78200a7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1315,8 +1315,6 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) dev_info(&rproc->dev, "releasing %s\n", rproc->name); - rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); - idr_destroy(&rproc->notifyids); if (rproc->index >= 0) @@ -1491,6 +1489,8 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) if (rproc->auto_boot) rproc_shutdown(rproc); + rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc); + /* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */ mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex); list_del(&rproc->node);
The "remoteproc{0,1...}" sysfs entries are added in rproc_add() and deleted in rproc_type_release() instead of in rproc_del(). That leaves these lingering entries sticking around after we return from rproc_del(). Move the rproc_delete_debug_dir() to rproc_del() to fix this. Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)