| Message ID | 20170214170836.2705798-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
Thanks Arnd, this looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:08:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated > to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning: > > fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim': > fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero [-Werror=extra] > > Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Thanks, applied (4.11). --D > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim( > struct rb_node *rbp; > bool ret = false; > > - ASSERT(len > 0); > + ASSERT(*len > 0); > > spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock); > restart: > -- > 2.9.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim( struct rb_node *rbp; bool ret = false; - ASSERT(len > 0); + ASSERT(*len > 0); spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock); restart:
The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning: fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim': fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero [-Werror=extra] Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)