| Message ID | 1488495410-137500-1-git-send-email-igor.druzhinin@citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Druzhinin [mailto:igor.druzhinin@citrix.com] > Sent: 02 March 2017 22:57 > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu > <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect > > In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent > queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on > other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen- > netback/interface.c > index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > net_device *dev) > { > struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; Do you not need an rcu_read_lock() around this and use of the num_queues value (as you have below)? > + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > u16 index; > struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; > > @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats > *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > { > struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > + unsigned int num_queues; > u64 rx_bytes = 0; > u64 rx_packets = 0; > u64 tx_bytes = 0; > u64 tx_packets = 0; > unsigned int index; > > - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > - if (vif->queues == NULL) > + rcu_read_lock(); > + > + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > + if (num_queues < 1) > goto out; > > /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ > - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { > + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { > queue = &vif->queues[index]; > rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; > rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; > @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats > *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > } > > out: > - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; > vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- > netback/xenbus.c > index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct > backend_info *be) > struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; > > if (vif) { > + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > unsigned int queue_index; > - struct xenvif_queue *queues; > > xen_unregister_watchers(vif); > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); > #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ > xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); > - for (queue_index = 0; > - queue_index < vif->num_queues; > - ++queue_index) > - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > > - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > - queues = vif->queues; > vif->num_queues = 0; > - vif->queues = NULL; > - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > + synchronize_net(); So, num_queues is your RCU protected value, rather than the queues pointer, in which case I think you probably need to change code such as https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c?id=refs/tags/v4.10#n216 to be gated on num_queues. Also shouldn't xenvif_up(), xenvif_down() and xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() not be using rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() of num_queues as well? Paul > > - vfree(queues); > + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; > ++queue_index) > + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > + > + vfree(vif->queues); > + vif->queues = NULL; > > xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); > } > -- > 1.8.3.1
On 03/03/17 09:18, Paul Durrant wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Igor Druzhinin [mailto:igor.druzhinin@citrix.com] >> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:57 >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu >> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> >> Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect >> >> In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent >> queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on >> other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- >> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen- >> netback/interface.c >> index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct >> net_device *dev) >> { >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; >> - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > > Do you not need an rcu_read_lock() around this and use of the num_queues value (as you have below)? > >> + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; >> u16 index; >> struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; >> >> @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) >> { >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; >> + unsigned int num_queues; >> u64 rx_bytes = 0; >> u64 rx_packets = 0; >> u64 tx_bytes = 0; >> u64 tx_packets = 0; >> unsigned int index; >> >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); >> - if (vif->queues == NULL) >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> + >> + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; >> + if (num_queues < 1) >> goto out; >> >> /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ >> - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { >> + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { >> queue = &vif->queues[index]; >> rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; >> rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; >> @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) >> } >> >> out: >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> >> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; >> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- >> netback/xenbus.c >> index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct >> backend_info *be) >> struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; >> >> if (vif) { >> + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; >> unsigned int queue_index; >> - struct xenvif_queue *queues; >> >> xen_unregister_watchers(vif); >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS >> xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); >> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ >> xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); >> - for (queue_index = 0; >> - queue_index < vif->num_queues; >> - ++queue_index) >> - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); >> >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); >> - queues = vif->queues; >> vif->num_queues = 0; >> - vif->queues = NULL; >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); >> + synchronize_net(); > > So, num_queues is your RCU protected value, rather than the queues pointer, in which case I think you probably need to change code such as > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c?id=refs/tags/v4.10#n216 > > to be gated on num_queues. > > Also shouldn't xenvif_up(), xenvif_down() and xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() not be using rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() of num_queues as well? > > Paul > xenvif_up() and xenvif_down() are called under rtnl_lock. xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() is a good candidate. I'm not sure about xenvif_fatal_tx_err. Is it actually called from already protected regions? Igor >> >> - vfree(queues); >> + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; >> ++queue_index) >> + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); >> + >> + vfree(vif->queues); >> + vif->queues = NULL; >> >> xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); >> } >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >
On 03/03/17 09:18, Paul Durrant wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Igor Druzhinin [mailto:igor.druzhinin@citrix.com] >> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:57 >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu >> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> >> Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect >> >> In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent >> queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on >> other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- >> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen- >> netback/interface.c >> index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct >> net_device *dev) >> { >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; >> - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > > Do you not need an rcu_read_lock() around this and use of the num_queues value (as you have below)? Huh, missed this one. Point is that xenvif_start_xmit is already in RCU read section. Igor > >> + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; >> u16 index; >> struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; >> >> @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) >> { >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; >> + unsigned int num_queues; >> u64 rx_bytes = 0; >> u64 rx_packets = 0; >> u64 tx_bytes = 0; >> u64 tx_packets = 0; >> unsigned int index; >> >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); >> - if (vif->queues == NULL) >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> + >> + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; >> + if (num_queues < 1) >> goto out; >> >> /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ >> - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { >> + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { >> queue = &vif->queues[index]; >> rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; >> rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; >> @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) >> } >> >> out: >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> >> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; >> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- >> netback/xenbus.c >> index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct >> backend_info *be) >> struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; >> >> if (vif) { >> + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; >> unsigned int queue_index; >> - struct xenvif_queue *queues; >> >> xen_unregister_watchers(vif); >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS >> xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); >> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ >> xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); >> - for (queue_index = 0; >> - queue_index < vif->num_queues; >> - ++queue_index) >> - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); >> >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); >> - queues = vif->queues; >> vif->num_queues = 0; >> - vif->queues = NULL; >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); >> + synchronize_net(); > > So, num_queues is your RCU protected value, rather than the queues pointer, in which case I think you probably need to change code such as > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c?id=refs/tags/v4.10#n216 > > to be gated on num_queues. > > Also shouldn't xenvif_up(), xenvif_down() and xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() not be using rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() of num_queues as well? > > Paul > >> >> - vfree(queues); >> + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; >> ++queue_index) >> + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); >> + >> + vfree(vif->queues); >> + vif->queues = NULL; >> >> xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); >> } >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Druzhinin > Sent: 03 March 2017 13:56 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen- > devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect > > On 03/03/17 09:18, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Igor Druzhinin [mailto:igor.druzhinin@citrix.com] > >> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:57 > >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > >> Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu > >> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > >> Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect > >> > >> In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent > >> queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on > >> other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- > >> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- > >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen- > >> netback/interface.c > >> index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, > struct > >> net_device *dev) > >> { > >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > >> - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > > > > Do you not need an rcu_read_lock() around this and use of the > num_queues value (as you have below)? > > Huh, missed this one. Point is that xenvif_start_xmit is already in RCU > read section. > Ok. Probably worth a comment then since the rcu_deref looks wrong out on its own like that. Paul > Igor > > > > >> + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > >> u16 index; > >> struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; > >> > >> @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats > >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > >> { > >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > >> + unsigned int num_queues; > >> u64 rx_bytes = 0; > >> u64 rx_packets = 0; > >> u64 tx_bytes = 0; > >> u64 tx_packets = 0; > >> unsigned int index; > >> > >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > >> - if (vif->queues == NULL) > >> + rcu_read_lock(); > >> + > >> + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > >> + if (num_queues < 1) > >> goto out; > >> > >> /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ > >> - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { > >> + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { > >> queue = &vif->queues[index]; > >> rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; > >> rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; > >> @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats > >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > >> } > >> > >> out: > >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > >> + rcu_read_unlock(); > >> > >> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; > >> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- > >> netback/xenbus.c > >> index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct > >> backend_info *be) > >> struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; > >> > >> if (vif) { > >> + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > >> unsigned int queue_index; > >> - struct xenvif_queue *queues; > >> > >> xen_unregister_watchers(vif); > >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > >> xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); > >> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ > >> xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); > >> - for (queue_index = 0; > >> - queue_index < vif->num_queues; > >> - ++queue_index) > >> - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > >> > >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > >> - queues = vif->queues; > >> vif->num_queues = 0; > >> - vif->queues = NULL; > >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > >> + synchronize_net(); > > > > So, num_queues is your RCU protected value, rather than the queues > pointer, in which case I think you probably need to change code such as > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/ne > t/xen-netback/netback.c?id=refs/tags/v4.10#n216 > > > > to be gated on num_queues. > > > > Also shouldn't xenvif_up(), xenvif_down() and xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() > not be using rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() of num_queues as well? > > > > Paul > > > >> > >> - vfree(queues); > >> + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; > >> ++queue_index) > >> + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > >> + > >> + vfree(vif->queues); > >> + vif->queues = NULL; > >> > >> xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); > >> } > >> -- > >> 1.8.3.1 > >
> -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Druzhinin > Sent: 03 March 2017 13:54 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen- > devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect > > On 03/03/17 09:18, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Igor Druzhinin [mailto:igor.druzhinin@citrix.com] > >> Sent: 02 March 2017 22:57 > >> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > >> Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; jgross@suse.com; Wei Liu > >> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > >> Subject: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race condition on XenBus disconnect > >> > >> In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent > >> queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on > >> other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- > >> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- > >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen- > >> netback/interface.c > >> index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c > >> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, > struct > >> net_device *dev) > >> { > >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > >> - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > > > > Do you not need an rcu_read_lock() around this and use of the > num_queues value (as you have below)? > > > >> + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > >> u16 index; > >> struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; > >> > >> @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats > >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > >> { > >> struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); > >> struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; > >> + unsigned int num_queues; > >> u64 rx_bytes = 0; > >> u64 rx_packets = 0; > >> u64 tx_bytes = 0; > >> u64 tx_packets = 0; > >> unsigned int index; > >> > >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > >> - if (vif->queues == NULL) > >> + rcu_read_lock(); > >> + > >> + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; > >> + if (num_queues < 1) > >> goto out; > >> > >> /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ > >> - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { > >> + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { > >> queue = &vif->queues[index]; > >> rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; > >> rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; > >> @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats > >> *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) > >> } > >> > >> out: > >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > >> + rcu_read_unlock(); > >> > >> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; > >> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- > >> netback/xenbus.c > >> index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct > >> backend_info *be) > >> struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; > >> > >> if (vif) { > >> + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; > >> unsigned int queue_index; > >> - struct xenvif_queue *queues; > >> > >> xen_unregister_watchers(vif); > >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > >> xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); > >> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ > >> xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); > >> - for (queue_index = 0; > >> - queue_index < vif->num_queues; > >> - ++queue_index) > >> - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > >> > >> - spin_lock(&vif->lock); > >> - queues = vif->queues; > >> vif->num_queues = 0; > >> - vif->queues = NULL; > >> - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); > >> + synchronize_net(); > > > > So, num_queues is your RCU protected value, rather than the queues > pointer, in which case I think you probably need to change code such as > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/ne > t/xen-netback/netback.c?id=refs/tags/v4.10#n216 > > > > to be gated on num_queues. > > > > Also shouldn't xenvif_up(), xenvif_down() and xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() > not be using rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() of num_queues as well? > > > > Paul > > > > xenvif_up() and xenvif_down() are called under rtnl_lock. > xenvif_get_ethtool_stats() is a good candidate. I'm not sure about > xenvif_fatal_tx_err. Is it actually called from already protected regions? > IIRC it's called out of the NAPI worker so I'd hope turning carrier off would be sufficient. I still thing that testing for !num_queues everywhere rather than !queues in some places would be better, even if you don't actually need to rcu protect all the tests. Paul > Igor > > >> > >> - vfree(queues); > >> + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; > >> ++queue_index) > >> + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); > >> + > >> + vfree(vif->queues); > >> + vif->queues = NULL; > >> > >> xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); > >> } > >> -- > >> 1.8.3.1 > >
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c index a2d32676..32e2cc6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int xenvif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; - unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; + unsigned int num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; u16 index; struct xenvif_rx_cb *cb; @@ -221,18 +221,21 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) { struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); struct xenvif_queue *queue = NULL; + unsigned int num_queues; u64 rx_bytes = 0; u64 rx_packets = 0; u64 tx_bytes = 0; u64 tx_packets = 0; unsigned int index; - spin_lock(&vif->lock); - if (vif->queues == NULL) + rcu_read_lock(); + + num_queues = rcu_dereference(vif)->num_queues; + if (num_queues < 1) goto out; /* Aggregate tx and rx stats from each queue */ - for (index = 0; index < vif->num_queues; ++index) { + for (index = 0; index < num_queues; ++index) { queue = &vif->queues[index]; rx_bytes += queue->stats.rx_bytes; rx_packets += queue->stats.rx_packets; @@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats *xenvif_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) } out: - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes = rx_bytes; vif->dev->stats.rx_packets = rx_packets; diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c index d2d7cd9..76efb01 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c @@ -495,26 +495,23 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct backend_info *be) struct xenvif *vif = be->vif; if (vif) { + unsigned int num_queues = vif->num_queues; unsigned int queue_index; - struct xenvif_queue *queues; xen_unregister_watchers(vif); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif); #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ xenvif_disconnect_data(vif); - for (queue_index = 0; - queue_index < vif->num_queues; - ++queue_index) - xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); - spin_lock(&vif->lock); - queues = vif->queues; vif->num_queues = 0; - vif->queues = NULL; - spin_unlock(&vif->lock); + synchronize_net(); - vfree(queues); + for (queue_index = 0; queue_index < num_queues; ++queue_index) + xenvif_deinit_queue(&vif->queues[queue_index]); + + vfree(vif->queues); + vif->queues = NULL; xenvif_disconnect_ctrl(vif); }
In some cases during XenBus disconnect event handling and subsequent queue resource release there may be some TX handlers active on other processors. Use RCU in order to synchronize with them. Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++++++++----- drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 17 +++++++---------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)