diff mbox

[1/3] drm/i915/bxt: Enable IPC support

Message ID 20170131145720.11961-2-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Kumar, Mahesh Jan. 31, 2017, 2:57 p.m. UTC
This patch adds IPC support for platforms. This patch enables IPC
only for BXT/KBL platform as for SKL recommendation is to keep it disabled.
IPC (Isochronous Priority Control) is the hardware feature, which
dynamically controls the memory read priority of Display.

When IPC is enabled, plane read requests are sent at high priority until
filling above the transition watermark, then the requests are sent at
lower priority until dropping below the level 0 watermark.
The lower priority requests allow other memory clients to have better
memory access. When IPC is disabled, all plane read requests are sent at
high priority.

Changes since V1:
 - Remove commandline parameter to disable ipc
 - Address Paulo's comments
Changes since V2:
 - Address review comments
 - Set ipc_enabled flag
Changes since V3:
 - move ipc_enabled flag assignment inside intel_ipc_enable function
Changes since V4:
 - Re-enable IPC after suspend/resume

Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c      |  4 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Jan. 31, 2017, 3:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 20:27 +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
> This patch adds IPC support for platforms. This patch enables IPC
> only for BXT/KBL platform as for SKL recommendation is to keep it disabled.
> IPC (Isochronous Priority Control) is the hardware feature, which
> dynamically controls the memory read priority of Display.
> 
> When IPC is enabled, plane read requests are sent at high priority until
> filling above the transition watermark, then the requests are sent at
> lower priority until dropping below the level 0 watermark.
> The lower priority requests allow other memory clients to have better
> memory access. When IPC is disabled, all plane read requests are sent at
> high priority.
> 
> Changes since V1:
>  - Remove commandline parameter to disable ipc
>  - Address Paulo's comments
> Changes since V2:
>  - Address review comments
>  - Set ipc_enabled flag
> Changes since V3:
>  - move ipc_enabled flag assignment inside intel_ipc_enable function
> Changes since V4:
>  - Re-enable IPC after suspend/resume
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c      |  4 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index ca168b22ee26..5f3b22946971 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
> pci_device_id *ent)
>  
>  	intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
>  
> -	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
>  
>  	/* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
>  	DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
> @@ -2439,6 +2439,8 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
>  
>  	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
>  
> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
> +
>  	if (ret)
>  		DRM_ERROR("Runtime resume failed, disabling it (%d)\n", ret);
>  	else
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 72f9f36ae5ce..36e0a33f876c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6466,6 +6466,7 @@ enum {
>  #define  DISP_FBC_WM_DIS		(1<<15)
>  #define DISP_ARB_CTL2	_MMIO(0x45004)
>  #define  DISP_DATA_PARTITION_5_6	(1<<6)
> +#define  DISP_IPC_ENABLE		(1<<3)
>  #define DBUF_CTL	_MMIO(0x45008)
>  #define  DBUF_POWER_REQUEST		(1<<31)
>  #define  DBUF_POWER_STATE		(1<<30)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 0bf8e1bfbe7e..1aa708b6f55e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -17222,6 +17222,7 @@ void intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	if (!ret)
>  		ret = __intel_display_resume(dev, state);
>  
> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
>  	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
>  	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 0cec0013ace0..ab7423b0a41b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct
> skl_ddb_entry **entries,
>  uint32_t ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>  bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
>  int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int enable_rc6);
> +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>  static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
>  {
>  	return i915.enable_rc6;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 249623d45be0..16e83efa1118 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4667,6 +4667,22 @@ void intel_update_watermarks(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  		dev_priv->display.update_wm(crtc);
>  }
>  
> +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
> +	if (!(IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)))
> +		return;

Do we want this enabled in Geminilake?

Ander

> +
> +	val = I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL2);
> +
> +	val |= DISP_IPC_ENABLE;
> +
> +	I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL2, val);
> +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = true;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Lock protecting IPS related data structures
>   */
Kumar, Mahesh Feb. 1, 2017, 6:44 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,


On Tuesday 31 January 2017 09:26 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 20:27 +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
>> This patch adds IPC support for platforms. This patch enables IPC
>> only for BXT/KBL platform as for SKL recommendation is to keep it disabled.
>> IPC (Isochronous Priority Control) is the hardware feature, which
>> dynamically controls the memory read priority of Display.
>>
>> When IPC is enabled, plane read requests are sent at high priority until
>> filling above the transition watermark, then the requests are sent at
>> lower priority until dropping below the level 0 watermark.
>> The lower priority requests allow other memory clients to have better
>> memory access. When IPC is disabled, all plane read requests are sent at
>> high priority.
>>
>> Changes since V1:
>>   - Remove commandline parameter to disable ipc
>>   - Address Paulo's comments
>> Changes since V2:
>>   - Address review comments
>>   - Set ipc_enabled flag
>> Changes since V3:
>>   - move ipc_enabled flag assignment inside intel_ipc_enable function
>> Changes since V4:
>>   - Re-enable IPC after suspend/resume
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c      |  4 +++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>   5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> index ca168b22ee26..5f3b22946971 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
>> pci_device_id *ent)
>>   
>>   	intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
>>   
>> -	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
>> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
>>   
>>   	/* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
>>   	DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
>> @@ -2439,6 +2439,8 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
>>   
>>   	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
>>   
>> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
>> +
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		DRM_ERROR("Runtime resume failed, disabling it (%d)\n", ret);
>>   	else
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 72f9f36ae5ce..36e0a33f876c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -6466,6 +6466,7 @@ enum {
>>   #define  DISP_FBC_WM_DIS		(1<<15)
>>   #define DISP_ARB_CTL2	_MMIO(0x45004)
>>   #define  DISP_DATA_PARTITION_5_6	(1<<6)
>> +#define  DISP_IPC_ENABLE		(1<<3)
>>   #define DBUF_CTL	_MMIO(0x45008)
>>   #define  DBUF_POWER_REQUEST		(1<<31)
>>   #define  DBUF_POWER_STATE		(1<<30)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 0bf8e1bfbe7e..1aa708b6f55e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -17222,6 +17222,7 @@ void intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	if (!ret)
>>   		ret = __intel_display_resume(dev, state);
>>   
>> +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
>>   	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
>>   	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
>>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 0cec0013ace0..ab7423b0a41b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct
>> skl_ddb_entry **entries,
>>   uint32_t ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>>   bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
>>   int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int enable_rc6);
>> +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
>>   {
>>   	return i915.enable_rc6;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 249623d45be0..16e83efa1118 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -4667,6 +4667,22 @@ void intel_update_watermarks(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>   		dev_priv->display.update_wm(crtc);
>>   }
>>   
>> +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
>> +	if (!(IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)))
>> +		return;
> Do we want this enabled in Geminilake?
>
> Ander
yes, we need to enable this for Gemnilake also, but we need "Transition 
WM" patch, before enabling it for GLK.

-Mahesh
>
>> +
>> +	val = I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL2);
>> +
>> +	val |= DISP_IPC_ENABLE;
>> +
>> +	I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL2, val);
>> +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = true;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Lock protecting IPS related data structures
>>    */
Zanoni, Paulo R March 15, 2017, 8:15 p.m. UTC | #3
Em Qua, 2017-02-01 às 12:14 +0530, Mahesh Kumar escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 31 January 2017 09:26 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 20:27 +0530, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
> > > 
> > > This patch adds IPC support for platforms. This patch enables IPC
> > > only for BXT/KBL platform as for SKL recommendation is to keep it
> > > disabled.
> > > IPC (Isochronous Priority Control) is the hardware feature, which
> > > dynamically controls the memory read priority of Display.
> > > 
> > > When IPC is enabled, plane read requests are sent at high
> > > priority until
> > > filling above the transition watermark, then the requests are
> > > sent at
> > > lower priority until dropping below the level 0 watermark.
> > > The lower priority requests allow other memory clients to have
> > > better
> > > memory access. When IPC is disabled, all plane read requests are
> > > sent at
> > > high priority.
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > >   - Remove commandline parameter to disable ipc
> > >   - Address Paulo's comments
> > > Changes since V2:
> > >   - Address review comments
> > >   - Set ipc_enabled flag
> > > Changes since V3:
> > >   - move ipc_enabled flag assignment inside intel_ipc_enable
> > > function
> > > Changes since V4:
> > >   - Re-enable IPC after suspend/resume
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c      |  4 +++-
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >   5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > index ca168b22ee26..5f3b22946971 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > > @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > const struct
> > > pci_device_id *ent)
> > >   
> > >   	intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
> > >   
> > > -	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
> > > +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
> > >   
> > >   	/* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
> > >   	DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor
> > > %d\n",
> > > @@ -2439,6 +2439,8 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct
> > > device *kdev)
> > >   
> > >   	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
> > >   
> > > +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
> > > +
> > >   	if (ret)
> > >   		DRM_ERROR("Runtime resume failed, disabling it
> > > (%d)\n", ret);
> > >   	else
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index 72f9f36ae5ce..36e0a33f876c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -6466,6 +6466,7 @@ enum {
> > >   #define  DISP_FBC_WM_DIS		(1<<15)
> > >   #define DISP_ARB_CTL2	_MMIO(0x45004)
> > >   #define  DISP_DATA_PARTITION_5_6	(1<<6)
> > > +#define  DISP_IPC_ENABLE		(1<<3)
> > >   #define DBUF_CTL	_MMIO(0x45008)
> > >   #define  DBUF_POWER_REQUEST		(1<<31)
> > >   #define  DBUF_POWER_STATE		(1<<30)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > index 0bf8e1bfbe7e..1aa708b6f55e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -17222,6 +17222,7 @@ void intel_display_resume(struct
> > > drm_device *dev)
> > >   	if (!ret)
> > >   		ret = __intel_display_resume(dev, state);
> > >   
> > > +	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
> > >   	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
> > >   	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
> > >   	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > index 0cec0013ace0..ab7423b0a41b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > > @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const
> > > struct
> > > skl_ddb_entry **entries,
> > >   uint32_t ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > > *pipe_config);
> > >   bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
> > >   int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int
> > > enable_rc6);
> > > +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > >   static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
> > >   {
> > >   	return i915.enable_rc6;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > index 249623d45be0..16e83efa1118 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > @@ -4667,6 +4667,22 @@ void intel_update_watermarks(struct
> > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > >   		dev_priv->display.update_wm(crtc);
> > >   }
> > >   
> > > +void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > +{
> > > +	u32 val;
> > > +
> > > +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
> > > +	if (!(IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)))
> > > +		return;
> > Do we want this enabled in Geminilake?
> > 
> > Ander
> yes, we need to enable this for Gemnilake also, but we need
> "Transition 
> WM" patch, before enabling it for GLK.

Why do we need transition WMs before enabling IPC on GLK but not on the
other platforms?

> 
> -Mahesh
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > +
> > > +	val = I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL2);
> > > +
> > > +	val |= DISP_IPC_ENABLE;
> > > +
> > > +	I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL2, val);
> > > +	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   /*
> > >    * Lock protecting IPS related data structures
> > >    */
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index ca168b22ee26..5f3b22946971 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@  int i915_driver_load(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_enable(dev_priv);
 
-	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
+	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
 
 	/* Everything is in place, we can now relax! */
 	DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s for %s on minor %d\n",
@@ -2439,6 +2439,8 @@  static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
 
 	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
 
+	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
+
 	if (ret)
 		DRM_ERROR("Runtime resume failed, disabling it (%d)\n", ret);
 	else
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 72f9f36ae5ce..36e0a33f876c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -6466,6 +6466,7 @@  enum {
 #define  DISP_FBC_WM_DIS		(1<<15)
 #define DISP_ARB_CTL2	_MMIO(0x45004)
 #define  DISP_DATA_PARTITION_5_6	(1<<6)
+#define  DISP_IPC_ENABLE		(1<<3)
 #define DBUF_CTL	_MMIO(0x45008)
 #define  DBUF_POWER_REQUEST		(1<<31)
 #define  DBUF_POWER_STATE		(1<<30)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 0bf8e1bfbe7e..1aa708b6f55e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -17222,6 +17222,7 @@  void intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = __intel_display_resume(dev, state);
 
+	intel_enable_ipc(dev_priv);
 	drm_modeset_drop_locks(&ctx);
 	drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&ctx);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 0cec0013ace0..ab7423b0a41b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@  bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(const struct skl_ddb_entry **entries,
 uint32_t ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
 bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
 int sanitize_rc6_option(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int enable_rc6);
+void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
 static inline int intel_enable_rc6(void)
 {
 	return i915.enable_rc6;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 249623d45be0..16e83efa1118 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4667,6 +4667,22 @@  void intel_update_watermarks(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 		dev_priv->display.update_wm(crtc);
 }
 
+void intel_enable_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = false;
+	if (!(IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)))
+		return;
+
+	val = I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL2);
+
+	val |= DISP_IPC_ENABLE;
+
+	I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL2, val);
+	dev_priv->ipc_enabled = true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Lock protecting IPS related data structures
  */