| Message ID | 1488573695-106680-4-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
| Headers | show |
On 3 March 2017 at 21:41, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote: > Notify runtime PM when the CPU is going to be powered off in the idle > state. This allows for runtime PM suspend/resume of the CPU as well as > its PM domain. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> > --- > include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 + > kernel/cpu_pm.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > index 921acaa..448226a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state { > CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE, > CPUHP_AP_SCHED_STARTING, > CPUHP_AP_RCUTREE_DYING, > + CPUHP_AP_CPU_PM_STARTING, > CPUHP_AP_IRQ_GIC_STARTING, > CPUHP_AP_IRQ_HIP04_STARTING, > CPUHP_AP_IRQ_ARMADA_XP_STARTING, > diff --git a/kernel/cpu_pm.c b/kernel/cpu_pm.c > index 009cc9a..db95ef3 100644 > --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c > +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c > @@ -16,9 +16,12 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/cpu.h> > +#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h> > #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/notifier.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> > > @@ -99,6 +102,7 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) > { > int nr_calls; > int ret = 0; > + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id()); > > read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); > ret = cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER, -1, &nr_calls); > @@ -110,6 +114,10 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) > cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED, nr_calls - 1, NULL); > read_unlock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); > > + /* Notify Runtime PM that we are suspending the CPU */ > + if (!ret && dev) > + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev)); > + I am trying to understand how the runtime PM usage count becomes properly balanced. I believe you could you end up first calling a pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(), without earlier having called pm_runtime_get*(). I am not sure though, but perhaps you can elaborate. Anyway, in patch2/9, where you enable runtime PM there is only a call to pm_runtime_set_active(), which doesn't increase the usage count. To me, it seems like that change also needs a pm_runtime_get_noresume(). > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_pm_enter); > @@ -129,6 +137,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_pm_enter); > int cpu_pm_exit(void) > { > int ret; > + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id()); > + > + /* Notify Runtime PM that we are resuming the CPU */ > + if (dev) > + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_get_sync(dev)); > > read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); > ret = cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_EXIT, -1, NULL); > @@ -200,6 +213,40 @@ int cpu_cluster_pm_exit(void) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_cluster_pm_exit); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU > +static int cpu_pm_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); > + > + if (dev) > + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int cpu_pm_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); > + > + if (dev) > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); I assume that according to my comment above, you somehow need to compensate for either of the cases when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is set or unset. Right? > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int __init cpu_pm_hotplug_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_CPU_PM_STARTING, > + "AP_CPU_PM_STARTING", > + cpu_pm_cpu_starting, cpu_pm_cpu_dying); > + > + return ret; > +} > +device_initcall(cpu_pm_hotplug_init); > +#endif > + > #ifdef CONFIG_PM > static int cpu_pm_suspend(void) > { > -- > 2.7.4 > Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> writes: > On 3 March 2017 at 21:41, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote: >> Notify runtime PM when the CPU is going to be powered off in the idle >> state. This allows for runtime PM suspend/resume of the CPU as well as >> its PM domain. >> >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> >> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> [...] >> @@ -99,6 +102,7 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) >> { >> int nr_calls; >> int ret = 0; >> + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id()); >> >> read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); >> ret = cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER, -1, &nr_calls); >> @@ -110,6 +114,10 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) >> cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED, nr_calls - 1, NULL); >> read_unlock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); >> >> + /* Notify Runtime PM that we are suspending the CPU */ >> + if (!ret && dev) >> + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev)); >> + > > I am trying to understand how the runtime PM usage count becomes > properly balanced. > > I believe you could you end up first calling a > pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(), without earlier having called > pm_runtime_get*(). I am not sure though, but perhaps you can > elaborate. > > Anyway, in patch2/9, where you enable runtime PM there is only a call > to pm_runtime_set_active(), which doesn't increase the usage count. To > me, it seems like that change also needs a pm_runtime_get_noresume(). IIUC, the CPU hotplug callback below (cpu_pm_cpu_starting) will do the first _get_sync(), and I'm assuming that will happen before any of the CPU PM notifiers get called, so I think the usecount will always be at least 1 by the time any CPU PM callbacks happen. [...] >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU >> +static int cpu_pm_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); >> + >> + if (dev) >> + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int cpu_pm_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); >> + >> + if (dev) >> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > > I assume that according to my comment above, you somehow need to > compensate for either of the cases when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is set or > unset. Right? Right, if for some reason CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we'll have a problem where there is never an initial _get() so the usecount will be zero when CPU PM notifiers get called the first time. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h index 921acaa..448226a 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state { CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE, CPUHP_AP_SCHED_STARTING, CPUHP_AP_RCUTREE_DYING, + CPUHP_AP_CPU_PM_STARTING, CPUHP_AP_IRQ_GIC_STARTING, CPUHP_AP_IRQ_HIP04_STARTING, CPUHP_AP_IRQ_ARMADA_XP_STARTING, diff --git a/kernel/cpu_pm.c b/kernel/cpu_pm.c index 009cc9a..db95ef3 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu_pm.c +++ b/kernel/cpu_pm.c @@ -16,9 +16,12 @@ */ #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/notifier.h> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h> @@ -99,6 +102,7 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) { int nr_calls; int ret = 0; + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id()); read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); ret = cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER, -1, &nr_calls); @@ -110,6 +114,10 @@ int cpu_pm_enter(void) cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED, nr_calls - 1, NULL); read_unlock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); + /* Notify Runtime PM that we are suspending the CPU */ + if (!ret && dev) + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev)); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_pm_enter); @@ -129,6 +137,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_pm_enter); int cpu_pm_exit(void) { int ret; + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(smp_processor_id()); + + /* Notify Runtime PM that we are resuming the CPU */ + if (dev) + RCU_NONIDLE(pm_runtime_get_sync(dev)); read_lock(&cpu_pm_notifier_lock); ret = cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_EXIT, -1, NULL); @@ -200,6 +213,40 @@ int cpu_cluster_pm_exit(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_cluster_pm_exit); +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU +static int cpu_pm_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); + + if (dev) + pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(dev); + + return 0; +} + +static int cpu_pm_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); + + if (dev) + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init cpu_pm_hotplug_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_CPU_PM_STARTING, + "AP_CPU_PM_STARTING", + cpu_pm_cpu_starting, cpu_pm_cpu_dying); + + return ret; +} +device_initcall(cpu_pm_hotplug_init); +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int cpu_pm_suspend(void) {
Notify runtime PM when the CPU is going to be powered off in the idle state. This allows for runtime PM suspend/resume of the CPU as well as its PM domain. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> --- include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 + kernel/cpu_pm.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)