| Message ID | 1490879826-16754-3-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: > soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid > driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage > from pm.c. > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- > include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c > @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) > } > > /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */ > -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask) > +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void) > { > - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); > - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { > + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); > pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2); > + } else > + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as well so be sure to run it. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Friday 07 April 2017 01:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: >> soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid >> driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage >> from pm.c. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- >> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++ >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >> index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >> @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) >> } >> >> /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */ >> -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask) >> +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void) >> { >> - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >> - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) >> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { >> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >> pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2); >> + } else >> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); > > You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as > well so be sure to run it. > I ran checkpatch before posting, but it didn't complain about this. Here is the result when I ran it again today on the same patch. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:12 PM, pankaj.dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: > > > On Friday 07 April 2017 01:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: >>> soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid >>> driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage >>> from pm.c. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- >>> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++ >>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>> index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>> @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) >>> } >>> >>> /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */ >>> -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask) >>> +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void) >>> { >>> - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >>> - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) >>> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { >>> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >>> pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2); >>> + } else >>> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >> >> You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as >> well so be sure to run it. >> > > I ran checkpatch before posting, but it didn't complain about this. Here > is the result when I ran it again today on the same patch. > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl > exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked > > exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch > has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. Ahh, okay, my bad. :) But anyway please fix it. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Friday 07 April 2017 05:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:12 PM, pankaj.dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Friday 07 April 2017 01:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid >>>> driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage >>>> from pm.c. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- >>>> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++ >>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>>> index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c >>>> @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */ >>>> -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask) >>>> +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void) >>>> { >>>> - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >>>> - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) >>>> + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { >>>> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >>>> pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2); >>>> + } else >>>> + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); >>> >>> You need {} around this too. Checkpatch should complain about it as >>> well so be sure to run it. >>> >> >> I ran checkpatch before posting, but it didn't complain about this. Here >> is the result when I ran it again today on the same patch. >> >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl >> exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch >> >> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 81 lines checked >> >> exynos-chipid-v9/0002-ARM-EXYNOS-remove-usage-of-soc_is_exynosMMMM-from-pm.patch >> has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > Ahh, okay, my bad. :) > But anyway please fix it. OK will take care in next patchset. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c index 1a7e5b5..4a73b02 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c @@ -123,11 +123,13 @@ int exynos_pm_central_resume(void) } /* Ext-GIC nIRQ/nFIQ is the only wakeup source in AFTR */ -static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(long mask) +static void exynos_set_wakeupmask(void) { - pmu_raw_writel(mask, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); pmu_raw_writel(0x0, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2); + } else + pmu_raw_writel(EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL, S5P_WAKEUP_MASK); } static void exynos_cpu_set_boot_vector(long flags) @@ -141,7 +143,7 @@ static int exynos_aftr_finisher(unsigned long flags) { int ret; - exynos_set_wakeupmask(soc_is_exynos3250() ? 0x40003ffe : 0x0000ff3e); + exynos_set_wakeupmask(); /* Set value of power down register for aftr mode */ exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(SYS_AFTR); @@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void) cpu_pm_enter(); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) exynos_set_boot_flag(cpuid, C2_STATE); exynos_pm_central_suspend(); @@ -184,7 +186,7 @@ void exynos_enter_aftr(void) exynos_pm_central_resume(); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) exynos_clear_boot_flag(cpuid, C2_STATE); cpu_pm_exit(); @@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void) while (exynos_cpu_power_state(1) != S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN) cpu_relax(); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) { + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) { while (!pmu_raw_readl(S5P_PMU_SPARE2) && !atomic_read(&cpu1_wakeup)) cpu_relax(); @@ -277,7 +279,7 @@ static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void) call_firmware_op(cpu_boot, 1); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) dsb_sev(); else arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(1)); @@ -289,7 +291,7 @@ static int exynos_cpu0_enter_aftr(void) static int exynos_wfi_finisher(unsigned long flags) { - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) flush_cache_all(); cpu_do_idle(); @@ -311,7 +313,7 @@ static int exynos_cpu1_powerdown(void) */ exynos_cpu_power_down(1); - if (soc_is_exynos3250()) + if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos3250")) pmu_raw_writel(0, S5P_PMU_SPARE2); ret = cpu_suspend(0, exynos_wfi_finisher); diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h index 49df0a01..3a7e63f 100644 --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ #define S5P_WAKEUP_MASK 0x0608 #define S5P_WAKEUP_MASK2 0x0614 +#define EXYNOS_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL 0x0000FF3E +#define EXYNOS3_WAKEUP_MASK_VAL 0x40003FFE + #define S5P_INFORM0 0x0800 #define S5P_INFORM1 0x0804 #define S5P_INFORM5 0x0814
soc_is_exynosMMMM is staged for removal after adopting to exynos-chipid driver, so let's remove/minimize usage of any such helper function usage from pm.c. Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)