@@ -29,10 +29,9 @@ struct exynos_clkout {
struct clk_gate gate;
struct clk_mux mux;
spinlock_t slock;
- struct clk_onecell_data data;
- struct clk *clk_table[EXYNOS_CLKOUT_NR_CLKS];
void __iomem *reg;
u32 pmu_debug_save;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data data;
};
static struct exynos_clkout *clkout;
@@ -62,7 +61,9 @@ static void __init exynos_clkout_init(struct device_node *node, u32 mux_mask)
int ret;
int i;
- clkout = kzalloc(sizeof(*clkout), GFP_KERNEL);
+ clkout = kzalloc(sizeof(*clkout) +
+ sizeof(*clkout->data.hws) * EXYNOS_CLKOUT_NR_CLKS,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!clkout)
return;
@@ -100,17 +101,16 @@ static void __init exynos_clkout_init(struct device_node *node, u32 mux_mask)
clkout->mux.shift = EXYNOS_CLKOUT_MUX_SHIFT;
clkout->mux.lock = &clkout->slock;
- clkout->clk_table[0] = clk_register_composite(NULL, "clkout",
+ clkout->data.hws[0] = clk_hw_register_composite(NULL, "clkout",
parent_names, parent_count, &clkout->mux.hw,
&clk_mux_ops, NULL, NULL, &clkout->gate.hw,
&clk_gate_ops, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
| CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT);
- if (IS_ERR(clkout->clk_table[0]))
+ if (IS_ERR(clkout->data.hws[0]))
goto err_unmap;
- clkout->data.clks = clkout->clk_table;
- clkout->data.clk_num = EXYNOS_CLKOUT_NR_CLKS;
- ret = of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &clkout->data);
+ clkout->data.num = EXYNOS_CLKOUT_NR_CLKS;
+ ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, &clkout->data);
if (ret)
goto err_clk_unreg;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void __init exynos_clkout_init(struct device_node *node, u32 mux_mask)
return;
err_clk_unreg:
- clk_unregister(clkout->clk_table[0]);
+ clk_hw_unregister(clkout->data.hws[0]);
err_unmap:
iounmap(clkout->reg);
clks_put:
Clock providers should use the new struct clk_hw based API, so convert Exynos CLKOUT clock provider to the new approach. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-clkout.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)