Message ID | 1492850128-17472-2-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2017年04月22日 16:35, zhanghailiang wrote: > We will use this notifier to help COLO to notify filter object > to do something, like do checkpoint, or process failover event. > > Cc: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang<zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen<zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian<lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > net/colo.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/colo.h | 19 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+) Went through this series and I feel that the code duplicates (at least part) functionality of IOThread (iothread.c) . So I come to an idea that switch to use IOThread for COLO comparing thread then you can use aio bh to do the inter process communication. Thoughts? Thanks
On 2017/4/25 19:40, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2017年04月22日 16:35, zhanghailiang wrote: >> We will use this notifier to help COLO to notify filter object >> to do something, like do checkpoint, or process failover event. >> >> Cc: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang<zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen<zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian<lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> net/colo.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> net/colo.h | 19 +++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+) > Went through this series and I feel that the code duplicates (at least > part) functionality of IOThread (iothread.c) . So I come to an idea that, > switch to use IOThread for COLO comparing thread then you can use aio bh > to do the inter process communication. > > Thoughts? Interesting idea, but after investigation, we found it will make things quite complex if we use iothread for net compare (Actually, i don't think we can use it directly for COLO), It seems to be special for block, you can see some codes call block helpers. Besides, we still have to realize a way to communicate with COLO frame for filters (I mean patch 16/17/18), even we use it after reconstruct those iothread part. ;) Thanks, Hailiang > Thanks > > . >
On 2017年04月26日 16:14, Hailiang Zhang wrote: > On 2017/4/25 19:40, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2017年04月22日 16:35, zhanghailiang wrote: >>> We will use this notifier to help COLO to notify filter object >>> to do something, like do checkpoint, or process failover event. >>> >>> Cc: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang<zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen<zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian<lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> >>> --- >>> net/colo.c | 105 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> net/colo.h | 19 +++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+) >> Went through this series and I feel that the code duplicates (at least >> part) functionality of IOThread (iothread.c) . So I come to an idea >> that, >> switch to use IOThread for COLO comparing thread then you can use aio bh >> to do the inter process communication. >> >> Thoughts? > > Interesting idea, but after investigation, we found it will make > things quite complex > if we use iothread for net compare (Actually, i don't think we can use > it directly for COLO), > It seems to be special for block, you can see some codes call block > helpers. You mean iothread_stop_all() which was called by main()? It looks just use to change aio context back to main context. And I don't think you need to care about that. > Besides, we still have to realize a way to communicate with COLO frame > for filters (I mean patch 16/17/18), > even we use it after reconstruct those iothread part. ;) > I think you can use bh, and e.g go through all the filter in the bh. Thanks > Thanks, > Hailiang > >> Thanks >> >> . >> > > >
diff --git a/net/colo.c b/net/colo.c index 8cc166b..8aef670 100644 --- a/net/colo.c +++ b/net/colo.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include "qemu/osdep.h" #include "trace.h" #include "net/colo.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" uint32_t connection_key_hash(const void *opaque) { @@ -209,3 +210,107 @@ Connection *connection_get(GHashTable *connection_track_table, return conn; } + +static gboolean +filter_notify_prepare(GSource *source, gint *timeout) +{ + *timeout = -1; + + return FALSE; +} + +static gboolean +filter_notify_check(GSource *source) +{ + FilterNotifier *notify = (FilterNotifier *)source; + + return notify->pfd.revents & (G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR); +} + +static gboolean +filter_notify_dispatch(GSource *source, + GSourceFunc callback, + gpointer user_data) +{ + FilterNotifier *notify = (FilterNotifier *)source; + int revents; + uint64_t value; + int ret; + + revents = notify->pfd.revents & notify->pfd.events; + if (revents & (G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR)) { + ret = filter_notifier_get(notify, &value); + if (notify->cb && !ret) { + notify->cb(notify, value); + } + } + return TRUE; +} + +static void +filter_notify_finalize(GSource *source) +{ + FilterNotifier *notify = (FilterNotifier *)source; + + event_notifier_cleanup(¬ify->event); +} + +static GSourceFuncs notifier_source_funcs = { + filter_notify_prepare, + filter_notify_check, + filter_notify_dispatch, + filter_notify_finalize, +}; + +FilterNotifier *filter_notifier_new(FilterNotifierCallback *cb, + void *opaque, Error **errp) +{ + FilterNotifier *notify; + int ret; + + notify = (FilterNotifier *)g_source_new(¬ifier_source_funcs, + sizeof(FilterNotifier)); + ret = event_notifier_init(¬ify->event, false); + if (ret < 0) { + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Failed to initialize event notifier"); + goto fail; + } + notify->pfd.fd = event_notifier_get_fd(¬ify->event); + notify->pfd.events = G_IO_IN | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_ERR; + notify->cb = cb; + notify->opaque = opaque; + g_source_add_poll(¬ify->source, ¬ify->pfd); + + return notify; + +fail: + g_source_destroy(¬ify->source); + return NULL; +} + +int filter_notifier_set(FilterNotifier *notify, uint64_t value) +{ + ssize_t ret; + + do { + ret = write(notify->event.wfd, &value, sizeof(value)); + } while (ret < 0 && errno == EINTR); + + /* EAGAIN is fine, a read must be pending. */ + if (ret < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) { + return -errno; + } + return 0; +} + +int filter_notifier_get(FilterNotifier *notify, uint64_t *value) +{ + ssize_t len; + + /* Drain the notify pipe. For eventfd, only 8 bytes will be read. */ + do { + len = read(notify->event.rfd, value, sizeof(*value)); + } while ((len == -1 && errno == EINTR)); + + return len != sizeof(*value) ? -1 : 0; +} diff --git a/net/colo.h b/net/colo.h index cd9027f..b586db3 100644 --- a/net/colo.h +++ b/net/colo.h @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include "qemu/jhash.h" #include "qemu/timer.h" #include "slirp/tcp.h" +#include "qemu/event_notifier.h" #define HASHTABLE_MAX_SIZE 16384 @@ -89,4 +90,22 @@ void connection_hashtable_reset(GHashTable *connection_track_table); Packet *packet_new(const void *data, int size); void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data); +typedef void FilterNotifierCallback(void *opaque, int value); +typedef struct FilterNotifier { + GSource source; + EventNotifier event; + GPollFD pfd; + FilterNotifierCallback *cb; + void *opaque; +} FilterNotifier; + +FilterNotifier *filter_notifier_new(FilterNotifierCallback *cb, + void *opaque, Error **errp); +int filter_notifier_set(FilterNotifier *notify, uint64_t value); +int filter_notifier_get(FilterNotifier *notify, uint64_t *value); + +enum { + COLO_CHECKPOINT = 2, + COLO_FAILOVER, +}; #endif /* QEMU_COLO_PROXY_H */