diff mbox

[v2] ibmvscsis: Fix the incorrect req_lim_delta

Message ID 1494444947-77322-1-git-send-email-bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Bryant G. Ly May 10, 2017, 7:35 p.m. UTC
The current code is not correctly calculating the req_lim_delta.

We want to make sure vscsi->credit is always incremented when
we do not send a response for the scsi op. Thus for the case where
there is a successfully aborted task we need to make sure the
vscsi->credit is incremented.

v2 - Moves the original location of the vscsi->credit increment
to a better spot. Since if we increment credit, the next command
we send back will have increased req_lim_delta. But we probably
shouldn't be doing that until the aborted cmd is actually released.
Otherwise the client will think that it can send a new command, and
we could find ourselves short of command elements. Not likely, but could
happen.

This patch depends on both:
commit 25e78531268e ("ibmvscsis: Do not send aborted task response")
commit 38b2788edbd6 ("ibmvscsis: Clear left-over abort_cmd pointers")

Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Cyr <mikecyr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
---
 drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Nicholas A. Bellinger May 11, 2017, 6:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 14:35 -0500, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
> The current code is not correctly calculating the req_lim_delta.
> 
> We want to make sure vscsi->credit is always incremented when
> we do not send a response for the scsi op. Thus for the case where
> there is a successfully aborted task we need to make sure the
> vscsi->credit is incremented.
> 
> v2 - Moves the original location of the vscsi->credit increment
> to a better spot. Since if we increment credit, the next command
> we send back will have increased req_lim_delta. But we probably
> shouldn't be doing that until the aborted cmd is actually released.
> Otherwise the client will think that it can send a new command, and
> we could find ourselves short of command elements. Not likely, but could
> happen.
> 
> This patch depends on both:
> commit 25e78531268e ("ibmvscsis: Do not send aborted task response")
> commit 38b2788edbd6 ("ibmvscsis: Clear left-over abort_cmd pointers")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Cyr <mikecyr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> index ee64241..abf6026 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
> @@ -1791,6 +1791,25 @@ static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi)
>  					list_del(&cmd->list);
>  					ibmvscsis_free_cmd_resources(vscsi,
>  								     cmd);
> +					/*
> +					 * With a successfully aborted op
> +					 * through LIO we want to increment the
> +					 * the vscsi credit so that when we dont
> +					 * send a rsp to the original scsi abort
> +					 * op (h_send_crq), but the tm rsp to
> +					 * the abort is sent, the credit is
> +					 * correctly sent with the abort tm rsp.
> +					 * We would need 1 for the abort tm rsp
> +					 * and 1 credit for the aborted scsi op.
> +					 * Thus we need to increment here.
> +					 * Also we want to increment the credit
> +					 * here because we want to make sure
> +					 * cmd is actually released first
> +					 * otherwise the client will think it
> +					 * it can send a new cmd, and we could
> +					 * find ourselves short of cmd elements.
> +					 */
> +					vscsi->credit += 1;
>  				} else {
>  					iue = cmd->iue;
>  
> @@ -2965,10 +2984,7 @@ static long srp_build_response(struct scsi_info *vscsi,
>  
>  	rsp->opcode = SRP_RSP;
>  
> -	if (vscsi->credit > 0 && vscsi->state == SRP_PROCESSING)
> -		rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(vscsi->credit);
> -	else
> -		rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(1 + vscsi->credit);
> +	rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(1 + vscsi->credit);
>  	rsp->tag = cmd->rsp.tag;
>  	rsp->flags = 0;
>  

Thanks Bryant.  Will apply post -rc1.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
index ee64241..abf6026 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
@@ -1791,6 +1791,25 @@  static void ibmvscsis_send_messages(struct scsi_info *vscsi)
 					list_del(&cmd->list);
 					ibmvscsis_free_cmd_resources(vscsi,
 								     cmd);
+					/*
+					 * With a successfully aborted op
+					 * through LIO we want to increment the
+					 * the vscsi credit so that when we dont
+					 * send a rsp to the original scsi abort
+					 * op (h_send_crq), but the tm rsp to
+					 * the abort is sent, the credit is
+					 * correctly sent with the abort tm rsp.
+					 * We would need 1 for the abort tm rsp
+					 * and 1 credit for the aborted scsi op.
+					 * Thus we need to increment here.
+					 * Also we want to increment the credit
+					 * here because we want to make sure
+					 * cmd is actually released first
+					 * otherwise the client will think it
+					 * it can send a new cmd, and we could
+					 * find ourselves short of cmd elements.
+					 */
+					vscsi->credit += 1;
 				} else {
 					iue = cmd->iue;
 
@@ -2965,10 +2984,7 @@  static long srp_build_response(struct scsi_info *vscsi,
 
 	rsp->opcode = SRP_RSP;
 
-	if (vscsi->credit > 0 && vscsi->state == SRP_PROCESSING)
-		rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(vscsi->credit);
-	else
-		rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(1 + vscsi->credit);
+	rsp->req_lim_delta = cpu_to_be32(1 + vscsi->credit);
 	rsp->tag = cmd->rsp.tag;
 	rsp->flags = 0;