| Message ID | 20170524013132.7521-1-suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:31:32AM +0800, Su Yue wrote: > In verify_dir_item, it wants to printk name_len of dir_item but > printk data_len acutally. Good catch, thanks. Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c index 60a750678a82..c24d615e3d7f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ int verify_dir_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, if (btrfs_dir_name_len(leaf, dir_item) > namelen) { btrfs_crit(fs_info, "invalid dir item name len: %u", - (unsigned)btrfs_dir_data_len(leaf, dir_item)); + (unsigned)btrfs_dir_name_len(leaf, dir_item)); return 1; }
In verify_dir_item, it wants to printk name_len of dir_item but printk data_len acutally. Fix it by calling btrfs_dir_name_len instead of btrfs_dir_data_len. Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/dir-item.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)