Message ID | 49a0c7551c337566be29b2c073ba0be57779d321.1496391726.git.osandov@fb.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2.06.2017 11:23, Omar Sandoval wrote: > From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> > > This is a regression test for "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting > leak caused by u32 overflow". It creates a bunch of delalloc extents and > merges them together to make sure the accounting is done right. > > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> > --- > tests/generic/438 | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/generic/438.out | 2 ++ > tests/generic/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/generic/438 > create mode 100644 tests/generic/438.out > > diff --git a/tests/generic/438 b/tests/generic/438 > new file mode 100755 > index 00000000..8edac03d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/438 > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# FS QA Test 438 > +# > +# Test delayed allocation with a large number of extents that are merged. > +# Regression test for patch "Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 > +# overflow". > +# > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook. All Rights Reserved. > +# > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > +# published by the Free Software Foundation. > +# > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > +# > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, > +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# > + > +seq=`basename $0` > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > + > +here=`pwd` > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > +status=1 # failure is the default! > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > + > +test_file="$TEST_DIR/$seq" > + > +_cleanup() > +{ > + cd / > + rm -f $tmp.* "$test_file" > +} > + > +. ./common/rc > +. ./common/filter > + > +rm -f $seqres.full > + > +_supported_fs generic > +_supported_os Linux > +_require_test > + > +# Create 32k extents. All of these extents will be accounted as outstanding and > +# reserved. > +for ((i = 0; i < 32 * 1024; i++)); do > + xfs_io -f -c "pwrite $((2 * 4096 * i)) 4096" "$test_file" >>"$seqres.full" > +done > + > +# Fill in the gaps between the created extents. The outstanding extents will > +# all be merged into 1, but there will still be 32k reserved. > +for ((i = 0; i < 32 * 1024; i++)); do > + xfs_io -f -c "pwrite $((2 * 4096 * i + 1)) 4096" "$test_file" >>"$seqres.full" > +done > + > +# Flush the delayed allocations. > +sync > + > +# Make sure that we didn't leak any metadata space. > +if [[ $FSTYP = btrfs ]]; then > + uuid="$(findmnt -n -o UUID "$TEST_DIR")" if we are on btrfs and we don't have findmnt this test will likely fail. Perhaps include a _require_command findmnt > + cd "/sys/fs/btrfs/$uuid/allocation" > + echo "$(($(cat metadata/bytes_may_use) - $(cat global_rsv_reserved))) bytes leaked" | grep -v '^0 ' > +fi > + > +echo "Silence is golden" > + > +status=0 > +exit > diff --git a/tests/generic/438.out b/tests/generic/438.out > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..4968f4d7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/generic/438.out > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +QA output created by 438 > +Silence is golden > diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group > index 438c2990..c804b05d 100644 > --- a/tests/generic/group > +++ b/tests/generic/group > @@ -440,3 +440,4 @@ > 435 auto encrypt > 436 auto quick rw > 437 auto quick > +438 auto > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:07:37PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > +# Make sure that we didn't leak any metadata space. > > +if [[ $FSTYP = btrfs ]]; then > > + uuid="$(findmnt -n -o UUID "$TEST_DIR")" > > if we are on btrfs and we don't have findmnt this test will likely fail. > Perhaps include a _require_command findmnt I think utilities like findmnt should be checked at the beginning of the whole testuiste, not in each test that uses them. As findmnt is part of util-linux, missing it would also mean that eg 'mount' is missing. Highly unlikely. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:46:52PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:07:37PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > +# Make sure that we didn't leak any metadata space. > > > +if [[ $FSTYP = btrfs ]]; then > > > + uuid="$(findmnt -n -o UUID "$TEST_DIR")" > > > > if we are on btrfs and we don't have findmnt this test will likely fail. > > Perhaps include a _require_command findmnt > > I think utilities like findmnt should be checked at the beginning of the > whole testuiste, not in each test that uses them. As findmnt is part of Agreed. I think we can define a FINDMNT_PROG in common/config and refuse to run any test if it's mising, as what we did to $MOUNT_PROG and other must-have commands. (There's already a bare call to findmnt in common/rc, change it to call $FINDMNT_PROG too). We can do this in a separate patch. Thanks, Eryu > util-linux, missing it would also mean that eg 'mount' is missing. > Highly unlikely. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This looks like a btrfs-specific test, and not like a generic one to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:37:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This looks like a btrfs-specific test, and not like a generic one > to me. Nothing about the workload itself is btrfs-specific, we just have the extra check at the end. But I don't really care, I can make it a btrfs test unless Eryu has already applied it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:03:05PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:37:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This looks like a btrfs-specific test, and not like a generic one > > to me. > > Nothing about the workload itself is btrfs-specific, we just have the > extra check at the end. But I don't really care, I can make it a btrfs > test unless Eryu has already applied it. What's not very clear to me is that how do we check the accountings for non-btrfs filesystems, i.e. what would cause a test failure on non-btrfs filesystems besides an xfs_io write failure? I'd prefer a btrfs-specific test if there's no good way to do the check. Or if we want to keep it a generic test, some comments on the non-btrfs case would be good. I'm fine with either way. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:08:01AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:03:05PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:37:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > This looks like a btrfs-specific test, and not like a generic one > > > to me. > > > > Nothing about the workload itself is btrfs-specific, we just have the > > extra check at the end. But I don't really care, I can make it a btrfs > > test unless Eryu has already applied it. > > What's not very clear to me is that how do we check the accountings for > non-btrfs filesystems, i.e. what would cause a test failure on non-btrfs > filesystems besides an xfs_io write failure? I'd prefer a btrfs-specific > test if there's no good way to do the check. Or if we want to keep it a > generic test, some comments on the non-btrfs case would be good. I'm > fine with either way. > > Thanks, > Eryu The only thing I can imagine other filesystems hitting would be an early enospc or some sort of kernel warning, so I'll resend it as a btrfs test. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/generic/438 b/tests/generic/438 new file mode 100755 index 00000000..8edac03d --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/generic/438 @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# FS QA Test 438 +# +# Test delayed allocation with a large number of extents that are merged. +# Regression test for patch "Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 +# overflow". +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# Copyright (c) 2017 Facebook. All Rights Reserved. +# +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as +# published by the Free Software Foundation. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# + +seq=`basename $0` +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq +echo "QA output created by $seq" + +here=`pwd` +tmp=/tmp/$$ +status=1 # failure is the default! +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 + +test_file="$TEST_DIR/$seq" + +_cleanup() +{ + cd / + rm -f $tmp.* "$test_file" +} + +. ./common/rc +. ./common/filter + +rm -f $seqres.full + +_supported_fs generic +_supported_os Linux +_require_test + +# Create 32k extents. All of these extents will be accounted as outstanding and +# reserved. +for ((i = 0; i < 32 * 1024; i++)); do + xfs_io -f -c "pwrite $((2 * 4096 * i)) 4096" "$test_file" >>"$seqres.full" +done + +# Fill in the gaps between the created extents. The outstanding extents will +# all be merged into 1, but there will still be 32k reserved. +for ((i = 0; i < 32 * 1024; i++)); do + xfs_io -f -c "pwrite $((2 * 4096 * i + 1)) 4096" "$test_file" >>"$seqres.full" +done + +# Flush the delayed allocations. +sync + +# Make sure that we didn't leak any metadata space. +if [[ $FSTYP = btrfs ]]; then + uuid="$(findmnt -n -o UUID "$TEST_DIR")" + cd "/sys/fs/btrfs/$uuid/allocation" + echo "$(($(cat metadata/bytes_may_use) - $(cat global_rsv_reserved))) bytes leaked" | grep -v '^0 ' +fi + +echo "Silence is golden" + +status=0 +exit diff --git a/tests/generic/438.out b/tests/generic/438.out new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4968f4d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/generic/438.out @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +QA output created by 438 +Silence is golden diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group index 438c2990..c804b05d 100644 --- a/tests/generic/group +++ b/tests/generic/group @@ -440,3 +440,4 @@ 435 auto encrypt 436 auto quick rw 437 auto quick +438 auto