Message ID | 20170602101024.18940-11-wens@csie.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:10:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The DDC parent clock on the A31 SoC is also conveniently named >> "hdmi-ddc", which results in a name collision when the hdmi driver >> registers its internal DDC divider clock. >> >> Rename the internal clock to "hdmi-ddc-divider". >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> index e1071838f487..9a6b6243e977 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int _sun4i_ddc_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi, struct clk *parent, >> if (!ddc) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> - init.name = "hdmi-ddc"; >> + init.name = "hdmi-ddc-divider"; > > Can't we rename the CCU clock instead? Having the clock called > hdmi-ddc being the actual clock output on the DDC bus feels more > natural. Do you have any suggestions? The manual labels the conflicting one in the CCU as "HDMI_DDC"... ChenYu
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 10:33:25PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:10:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> The DDC parent clock on the A31 SoC is also conveniently named > >> "hdmi-ddc", which results in a name collision when the hdmi driver > >> registers its internal DDC divider clock. > >> > >> Rename the internal clock to "hdmi-ddc-divider". > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > >> index e1071838f487..9a6b6243e977 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > >> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int _sun4i_ddc_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi, struct clk *parent, > >> if (!ddc) > >> return -ENOMEM; > >> > >> - init.name = "hdmi-ddc"; > >> + init.name = "hdmi-ddc-divider"; > > > > Can't we rename the CCU clock instead? Having the clock called > > hdmi-ddc being the actual clock output on the DDC bus feels more > > natural. > > Do you have any suggestions? The manual labels the conflicting one > in the CCU as "HDMI_DDC"... DDC as the main CCU clock, and hdmi-ddc as the one actually generated by the HDMI controller? Maxime
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 10:33:25PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Maxime Ripard >> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:10:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> >> The DDC parent clock on the A31 SoC is also conveniently named >> >> "hdmi-ddc", which results in a name collision when the hdmi driver >> >> registers its internal DDC divider clock. >> >> >> >> Rename the internal clock to "hdmi-ddc-divider". >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c | 2 +- >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> >> index e1071838f487..9a6b6243e977 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c >> >> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int _sun4i_ddc_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi, struct clk *parent, >> >> if (!ddc) >> >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> >> >> - init.name = "hdmi-ddc"; >> >> + init.name = "hdmi-ddc-divider"; >> > >> > Can't we rename the CCU clock instead? Having the clock called >> > hdmi-ddc being the actual clock output on the DDC bus feels more >> > natural. >> >> Do you have any suggestions? The manual labels the conflicting one >> in the CCU as "HDMI_DDC"... > > DDC as the main CCU clock, and hdmi-ddc as the one actually generated > by the HDMI controller? I think I'll just name it hdmi-ddc-parent. Who knows if some other module comes in and has a clock named ddc. ChenYu
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c index e1071838f487..9a6b6243e977 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int _sun4i_ddc_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi, struct clk *parent, if (!ddc) return -ENOMEM; - init.name = "hdmi-ddc"; + init.name = "hdmi-ddc-divider"; init.ops = &sun4i_ddc_ops; init.parent_names = &parent_name; init.num_parents = 1;
The DDC parent clock on the A31 SoC is also conveniently named "hdmi-ddc", which results in a name collision when the hdmi driver registers its internal DDC divider clock. Rename the internal clock to "hdmi-ddc-divider". Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)