diff mbox

tty/serial: remove AVR32 specific access wrappers

Message ID 20170613202517.26558-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexandre Belloni June 13, 2017, 8:25 p.m. UTC
Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Richard Genoud June 14, 2017, 7:43 a.m. UTC | #1
On 13/06/2017 22:25, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

Acked-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Andy Shevchenko June 14, 2017, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
>

Can you rebase this on top of tty-next?

I'm pretty sure this patch will gone.

> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 17 -----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> index 937d67f22fba..8bfc566df2da 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
> @@ -228,21 +228,6 @@ static inline void atmel_uart_writel(struct uart_port *port, u32 reg, u32 value)
>         __raw_writel(value, port->membase + reg);
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_AVR32
> -
> -/* AVR32 cannot handle 8 or 16bit I/O accesses but only 32bit I/O accesses */
> -static inline u8 atmel_uart_read_char(struct uart_port *port)
> -{
> -       return __raw_readl(port->membase + ATMEL_US_RHR);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void atmel_uart_write_char(struct uart_port *port, u8 value)
> -{
> -       __raw_writel(value, port->membase + ATMEL_US_THR);
> -}
> -
> -#else
> -
>  static inline u8 atmel_uart_read_char(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
>         return __raw_readb(port->membase + ATMEL_US_RHR);
> @@ -253,8 +238,6 @@ static inline void atmel_uart_write_char(struct uart_port *port, u8 value)
>         __raw_writeb(value, port->membase + ATMEL_US_THR);
>  }
>
> -#endif
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_PDC
>  static bool atmel_use_pdc_rx(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Greg KH June 14, 2017, 10:49 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 17 -----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

Does not apply to my tty-next tree at all :(
Alexandre Belloni June 14, 2017, 1:27 p.m. UTC | #4
On 14/06/2017 at 12:43:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> > unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
> >
> 
> Can you rebase this on top of tty-next?
> 
> I'm pretty sure this patch will gone.
> 

So you avoided most of the bikeshedding by not copying any of the
maintainers, nice...
Alexandre Belloni June 14, 2017, 1:32 p.m. UTC | #5
On 14/06/2017 at 12:49:29 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> > unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 17 -----------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
> 
> Does not apply to my tty-next tree at all :(
> 

That's fine, as Andy pointed out, he did the job.
Andy Shevchenko June 14, 2017, 2:15 p.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 14/06/2017 at 12:43:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni
>> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> > Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
>> > unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
>> >
>>
>> Can you rebase this on top of tty-next?
>>
>> I'm pretty sure this patch will gone.
>>
>
> So you avoided most of the bikeshedding by not copying any of the
> maintainers, nice...

Wait, what? I used get_maintainer.pl script and I took its output + Greg.
Alexandre Belloni June 14, 2017, 2:26 p.m. UTC | #7
On 14/06/2017 at 17:15:32 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On 14/06/2017 at 12:43:40 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni
> >> <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >> > Now that AVR32 is gone, the specific wrappers for that architecture are
> >> > unnecessary and will not be compiled anymore.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Can you rebase this on top of tty-next?
> >>
> >> I'm pretty sure this patch will gone.
> >>
> >
> > So you avoided most of the bikeshedding by not copying any of the
> > maintainers, nice...
> 
> Wait, what? I used get_maintainer.pl script and I took its output + Greg.
> 

Yeah, get_maintainer is not ideal but that's fine. Probably the lakml
should be added.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
index 937d67f22fba..8bfc566df2da 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
@@ -228,21 +228,6 @@  static inline void atmel_uart_writel(struct uart_port *port, u32 reg, u32 value)
 	__raw_writel(value, port->membase + reg);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_AVR32
-
-/* AVR32 cannot handle 8 or 16bit I/O accesses but only 32bit I/O accesses */
-static inline u8 atmel_uart_read_char(struct uart_port *port)
-{
-	return __raw_readl(port->membase + ATMEL_US_RHR);
-}
-
-static inline void atmel_uart_write_char(struct uart_port *port, u8 value)
-{
-	__raw_writel(value, port->membase + ATMEL_US_THR);
-}
-
-#else
-
 static inline u8 atmel_uart_read_char(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	return __raw_readb(port->membase + ATMEL_US_RHR);
@@ -253,8 +238,6 @@  static inline void atmel_uart_write_char(struct uart_port *port, u8 value)
 	__raw_writeb(value, port->membase + ATMEL_US_THR);
 }
 
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_ATMEL_PDC
 static bool atmel_use_pdc_rx(struct uart_port *port)
 {