| Message ID | db94b5f7-d3a1-2340-0758-9437193d8254@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 2017.07.04 at 10:31 -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > On 07/04/2017 02:45 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2017.07.04 at 06:23 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > >> commit edf064e7c6fec3646b06c944a8e35d1a3de5c2c3 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) > >> Author: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> > >> Date: Tue Jun 20 07:05:49 2017 -0500 > >> > >> btrfs: nowait aio support > >> > >> apparently breaks several shell related features on my system. > > > > Here is a simple testcase: > > > > % echo "foo" >> test > > % echo "foo" >> test > > % cat test > > foo > > % > > > > Thanks for testing. > Yes, pos must be set with iocb->ki_pos for appends. I should not have > removed the initialization. Could you try this patch? It fixes the issue. Thank you.
On 07/04/2017 09:31 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > On 07/04/2017 02:45 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >> On 2017.07.04 at 06:23 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >>> commit edf064e7c6fec3646b06c944a8e35d1a3de5c2c3 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) >>> Author: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> >>> Date: Tue Jun 20 07:05:49 2017 -0500 >>> >>> btrfs: nowait aio support >>> >>> apparently breaks several shell related features on my system. >> >> Here is a simple testcase: >> >> % echo "foo" >> test >> % echo "foo" >> test >> % cat test >> foo >> % >> > > Thanks for testing. > Yes, pos must be set with iocb->ki_pos for appends. I should not have > removed the initialization. Could you try this patch? > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c > index 59e2dccdf75b..7947781229e5 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c > @@ -1931,6 +1931,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb > *iocb, > */ > update_time_for_write(inode); > > + pos = iocb->ki_pos; > start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize); > oldsize = i_size_read(inode); > if (start_pos > oldsize) { Please expedite getting this upstream, asap.
On 07/04/2017 05:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Please expedite getting this upstream, asap. > Jens, I have posted an updated patch [1] and it is acked by David. Would you pick it up or should it go through the btrfs tree (or some other tree)? [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9825813/
On 07/07/2017 07:51 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > > On 07/04/2017 05:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> Please expedite getting this upstream, asap. >> > > Jens, > > I have posted an updated patch [1] and it is acked by David. Would you > pick it up or should it go through the btrfs tree (or some other tree)? > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9825813/ I'm fine with either, I just want it to go in asap. I'm sending off a pull Monday. David, up to you.
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:09:28PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 07/07/2017 07:51 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > On 07/04/2017 05:16 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> Please expedite getting this upstream, asap. > > > > I have posted an updated patch [1] and it is acked by David. Would you > > pick it up or should it go through the btrfs tree (or some other tree)? > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9825813/ > > I'm fine with either, I just want it to go in asap. I'm sending off > a pull Monday. David, up to you. I'm reading this just now, so I'll send the patch in my pull today. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 59e2dccdf75b..7947781229e5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -1931,6 +1931,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, */ update_time_for_write(inode); + pos = iocb->ki_pos; start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize); oldsize = i_size_read(inode);