| Message ID | 20170728092818.23419-3-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> wrote: > This patch adds the sun8i-h3-ephy compatible to the internal PHY. > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 3 ++- To avoid repeating the past, this patch, if approved, will be merged through the sunxi tree, not netdev nor net-next. > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi > index 4b599b5d26f6..7aaa837c2388 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi > @@ -421,7 +421,8 @@ > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > int_mii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 { > - compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; > + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ephy", > + "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; Are you expecting people to override this properly? As it currently is, any external phy at address 1 will simply reuse the same device node. And if they don't override the property correctly, the driver will end up trying to use the internal phy, while the user is expecting the external one to be used. Maybe you could move this to some other address, maybe the last valid one, or second last valid one? ChenYu > reg = <1>; > clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_EPHY>; > resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_EPHY>; > -- > 2.13.0 >
于 2017年7月28日 GMT+08:00 下午5:44:51, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> 写到: >On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Corentin Labbe ><clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> wrote: >> This patch adds the sun8i-h3-ephy compatible to the internal PHY. >> >> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 3 ++- > >To avoid repeating the past, this patch, if approved, will be merged >through the sunxi tree, not netdev nor net-next. > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi >b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi >> index 4b599b5d26f6..7aaa837c2388 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi >> @@ -421,7 +421,8 @@ >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> int_mii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 { >> - compatible = >"ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; >> + compatible = >"allwinner,sun8i-h3-ephy", >> + >"ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; > >Are you expecting people to override this properly? > >As it currently is, any external phy at address 1 will simply >reuse the same device node. And if they don't override the >property correctly, the driver will end up trying to use >the internal phy, while the user is expecting the external >one to be used. > >Maybe you could move this to some other address, maybe the last >valid one, or second last valid one? Some board designers may use other address. For example, on Nano Pi NEO2 the PHY is attached at address 0x7. > >ChenYu > >> reg = <1>; >> clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_EPHY>; >> resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_EPHY>; >> -- >> 2.13.0 >>
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi index 4b599b5d26f6..7aaa837c2388 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi @@ -421,7 +421,8 @@ #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; int_mii_phy: ethernet-phy@1 { - compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ephy", + "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22"; reg = <1>; clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_EPHY>; resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_EPHY>;
This patch adds the sun8i-h3-ephy compatible to the internal PHY. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)