| Message ID | 1499333984-17668-1-git-send-email-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
[+cc Minghuan, Mingkai, Roy] On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:39:44PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > The ls1088a and ls2088a has the same PCIe controller, so the ls1088a > will reuse the ls2088a's pcie compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 1 + > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > index ee1c72d5..cb735e1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: > - compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as: > "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > + "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" You add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" here, but not in the ls_pcie_of_match[] table in the driver, so I don't think this will actually make the driver claim ls1088a devices, will it? I'm also waiting for an ack from the layerscape maintainers (added to cc list). > "fsl,ls1046a-pcie" > - reg: base addresses and lengths of the PCIe controller > - interrupts: A list of interrupt outputs of the controller. Must contain an > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > index 9bed3cd..0df8189 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > @@ -239,12 +239,21 @@ static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2080_drvdata = { > .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, > }; > > +static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2088_drvdata = { > + .lut_offset = 0x80000, > + .ltssm_shift = 0, > + .lut_dbg = 0x407fc, > + .ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops, > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, > +}; > + > static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &ls1046_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", .data = &ls2088_drvdata }, > { }, > }; > > -- > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Bjorn, Thanks a lot for your comments! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > Sent: 2017年8月3日 5:30 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Minghuan Lian > <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>; > Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: Add support for ls2088a and ls1088a > > [+cc Minghuan, Mingkai, Roy] > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:39:44PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > The ls1088a and ls2088a has the same PCIe controller, so the ls1088a > > will reuse the ls2088a's pcie compatible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 1 + > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 9 > +++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > index ee1c72d5..cb735e1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: > > - compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as: > > "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > + "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" > > You add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" here, but not in the ls_pcie_of_match[] table in the > driver, so I don't think this will actually make the driver claim ls1088a devices, > will it? I mean the ls1088a pcie DT nodes will use the "fsl,ls2088a-pcie" too, so I didn't add an entry for ls1088a pcie to ls_pcie_of_match[]. Is it reasonable? Or it's better to add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" to ls_pcie_of_match[], then ls1088a pcie DT nodes use the compatible string "fsl,ls1088a-pcie"? > I'm also waiting for an ack from the layerscape maintainers (added to cc list). > > > "fsl,ls1046a-pcie" > > - reg: base addresses and lengths of the PCIe controller > > - interrupts: A list of interrupt outputs of the controller. Must > > contain an diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > index 9bed3cd..0df8189 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c > > @@ -239,12 +239,21 @@ static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2080_drvdata = { > > .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, > > }; > > > > +static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2088_drvdata = { > > + .lut_offset = 0x80000, > > + .ltssm_shift = 0, > > + .lut_dbg = 0x407fc, > > + .ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops, > > + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, > > +}; > > + > > static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021_drvdata }, > > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043_drvdata }, > > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &ls1046_drvdata }, > > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, > > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, > > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", .data = &ls2088_drvdata }, > > { }, > > }; > > > > -- > > 2.1.0.27.g96db324 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel Thanks, Zhiqiang
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:35:46AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Thanks a lot for your comments! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > > Sent: 2017年8月3日 5:30 > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Minghuan Lian > > <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>; > > Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: Add support for ls2088a and ls1088a > > > > [+cc Minghuan, Mingkai, Roy] > > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:39:44PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > > > The ls1088a and ls2088a has the same PCIe controller, so the ls1088a > > > will reuse the ls2088a's pcie compatible. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 1 + > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 9 > > +++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > index ee1c72d5..cb735e1 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: > > > - compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as: > > > "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > > "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > > + "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" > > > > You add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" here, but not in the ls_pcie_of_match[] > > table in the driver, so I don't think this will actually make the > > driver claim ls1088a devices, will it? > > I mean the ls1088a pcie DT nodes will use the "fsl,ls2088a-pcie" > too, so I didn't add an entry for ls1088a pcie to > ls_pcie_of_match[]. Is it reasonable? Or it's better to add > "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" to ls_pcie_of_match[], then ls1088a pcie DT nodes > use the compatible string "fsl,ls1088a-pcie"? Your binding says "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" is a valid value for "compatible". But if a DT actually *uses* that, I don't think the driver will claim it. If you want to describe ls1088a devices with "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", I think you could do that, but then why would you even mention "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" in the binding? Personally, if ls1088a and ls2088a are different in any way, I would think you should use different identifiers for them (and add them both to the binding and to the driver). That way if a future feature depends on the difference, you'll have a way to test for it. But I'm not a DT guy. Maybe Rob has a better recommendation? Bjorn
On 08/02/2017 10:36 PM, Z.q. Hou wrote:
> add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" to ls_pcie_of_match[], then ls1088a pcie DT nodes use the compatible string "fsl,ls1088a-pcie"?
I'd suggest going this way.
Roy
Hi Bjorn, Thanks a lot for your comments! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > Sent: 2017年8月4日 2:19 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Minghuan Lian > <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>; robh+dt@kernel.org; > bhelgaas@google.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>; Roy Zang > <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: Add support for ls2088a and ls1088a > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:35:46AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > Thanks a lot for your comments! > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@kernel.org] > > > Sent: 2017年8月3日 5:30 > > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com> > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Minghuan Lian > > > <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>; Mingkai Hu > > > <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>; Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: Add support for ls2088a and > > > ls1088a > > > > > > [+cc Minghuan, Mingkai, Roy] > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:39:44PM +0800, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > > > > > The ls1088a and ls2088a has the same PCIe controller, so the > > > > ls1088a will reuse the ls2088a's pcie compatible. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt | 1 + > > > > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 9 > > > +++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > > index ee1c72d5..cb735e1 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt > > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: > > > > - compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as: > > > > "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > > > "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" > > > > + "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" > > > > > > You add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" here, but not in the ls_pcie_of_match[] > > > table in the driver, so I don't think this will actually make the > > > driver claim ls1088a devices, will it? > > > > I mean the ls1088a pcie DT nodes will use the "fsl,ls2088a-pcie" > > too, so I didn't add an entry for ls1088a pcie to ls_pcie_of_match[]. > > Is it reasonable? Or it's better to add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" to > > ls_pcie_of_match[], then ls1088a pcie DT nodes use the compatible > > string "fsl,ls1088a-pcie"? > > Your binding says "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" is a valid value for "compatible". But if a > DT actually *uses* that, I don't think the driver will claim it. > > If you want to describe ls1088a devices with "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", I think you > could do that, but then why would you even mention "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" in the > binding? > > Personally, if ls1088a and ls2088a are different in any way, I would think you > should use different identifiers for them (and add them both to the binding and > to the driver). That way if a future feature depends on the difference, you'll > have a way to test for it. Got it, will add both of them to driver and the bingding doc. Thanks for the suggestion! > But I'm not a DT guy. Maybe Rob has a better recommendation? > Thanks, Zhiqiang
Hi Roy, Thanks a lot for your comments! > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy Zang > Sent: 2017年8月4日 2:23 > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; Minghuan Lian > <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@freescale.com>; > Roy Zang <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: Add support for ls2088a and ls1088a > > On 08/02/2017 10:36 PM, Z.q. Hou wrote: > > add "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" to ls_pcie_of_match[], then ls1088a pcie DT nodes use > the compatible string "fsl,ls1088a-pcie"? > > I'd suggest going this way. Yes, thanks for the suggestion. Thanks, Zhiqiang
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt index ee1c72d5..cb735e1 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Required properties: - compatible: should contain the platform identifier such as: "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie" + "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", "fsl,ls1088a-pcie" "fsl,ls1046a-pcie" - reg: base addresses and lengths of the PCIe controller - interrupts: A list of interrupt outputs of the controller. Must contain an diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c index 9bed3cd..0df8189 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-layerscape.c @@ -239,12 +239,21 @@ static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2080_drvdata = { .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, }; +static struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls2088_drvdata = { + .lut_offset = 0x80000, + .ltssm_shift = 0, + .lut_dbg = 0x407fc, + .ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops, + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ops, +}; + static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021_drvdata }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043_drvdata }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &ls1046_drvdata }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata }, + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie", .data = &ls2088_drvdata }, { }, };