Message ID | 20170811164320.92899-3-roger.pau@citrix.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
> From: Roger Pau Monne > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 12:43 AM > > This is emulated by Xen and must not be mapped into PVH Dom0 p2m. same comment as previous one. please send it separately. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> > --- > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> > --- > xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c > index 3e0910d779..804efee1a9 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int __init dom0_setup_permissions(struct domain > *d) > for ( i = 0; i < nr_ioapics; i++ ) > { > mfn = paddr_to_pfn(mp_ioapics[i].mpc_apicaddr); > - if ( !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, mfn) ) > + if ( dom0_pvh || !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, > mfn) ) > rc |= iomem_deny_access(d, mfn, mfn); > } > /* MSI range. */ > -- > 2.11.0 (Apple Git-81) > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:12:45AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 12:43 AM > > > > This is emulated by Xen and must not be mapped into PVH Dom0 p2m. > > same comment as previous one. please send it separately. This will only be mapped once iommu_inclusive_mapping is available for PVH Dom0, which is what patch #3 does. It's not a bugfix because the bug it would be fix doesn't exist yet. Roger.
>>> On 11.08.17 at 18:43, <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote: > This is emulated by Xen and must not be mapped into PVH Dom0 p2m. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> If we stay with black listing MMIO ranges Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Jan
> From: Roger Pau Monne [mailto:roger.pau@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 5:35 PM > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 03:12:45AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > From: Roger Pau Monne > > > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 12:43 AM > > > > > > This is emulated by Xen and must not be mapped into PVH Dom0 p2m. > > > > same comment as previous one. please send it separately. > > This will only be mapped once iommu_inclusive_mapping is available for > PVH Dom0, which is what patch #3 does. It's not a bugfix because the > bug it would be fix doesn't exist yet. > Similarly please add more explanation why it's only includsive mapping specific. For people not familiar with PVH specifics, it's hard to get that feeling simply looking at the current patch description and actual patch which looks like a general change. e.g. you may want to explain why PVH dom0 doesn't require iomem_deny_access so far while it becomes necessary later... Thanks kevin
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c index 3e0910d779..804efee1a9 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ int __init dom0_setup_permissions(struct domain *d) for ( i = 0; i < nr_ioapics; i++ ) { mfn = paddr_to_pfn(mp_ioapics[i].mpc_apicaddr); - if ( !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, mfn) ) + if ( dom0_pvh || !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, mfn) ) rc |= iomem_deny_access(d, mfn, mfn); } /* MSI range. */
This is emulated by Xen and must not be mapped into PVH Dom0 p2m. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> --- Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> --- xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)