| Message ID | 20170824091447.GG27401@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 07:14:47PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Nixiaoming pointed out that there is a memory leak in > kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce() if the call to anon_inode_getfd() > fails; the memory allocated for the kvmppc_spapr_tce_table struct > is not freed, and nor are the pages allocated for the iommu > tables. In addition, we have already incremented the process's > count of locked memory pages, and this doesn't get restored on > error. > > David Hildenbrand pointed out that there is a race in that the > function checks early on that there is not already an entry in the > stt->iommu_tables list with the same LIOBN, but an entry with the > same LIOBN could get added between then and when the new entry is > added to the list. > > This fixes all three problems. To simplify things, we now call > anon_inode_getfd() before placing the new entry in the list. The > check for an existing entry is done while holding the kvm->lock > mutex, immediately before adding the new entry to the list. > Finally, on failure we now call kvmppc_account_memlimit to > decrement the process's count of locked memory pages. > > Reported-by: Nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> > Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > --- > v2: Don't overwrite stt in loop over spapr_tce_tables > > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > index a160c14..53766e2 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c > @@ -294,32 +294,26 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm, > struct kvm_create_spapr_tce_64 *args) > { > struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt = NULL; > + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *siter; > unsigned long npages, size; > int ret = -ENOMEM; > int i; > + int fd = -1; > > if (!args->size) > return -EINVAL; > > - /* Check this LIOBN hasn't been previously allocated */ > - list_for_each_entry(stt, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) { > - if (stt->liobn == args->liobn) > - return -EBUSY; > - } > - > size = _ALIGN_UP(args->size, PAGE_SIZE >> 3); > npages = kvmppc_tce_pages(size); > ret = kvmppc_account_memlimit(kvmppc_stt_pages(npages), true); > - if (ret) { > - stt = NULL; > - goto fail; > - } > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > ret = -ENOMEM; > stt = kzalloc(sizeof(*stt) + npages * sizeof(struct page *), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!stt) > - goto fail; > + goto fail_acct; > > stt->liobn = args->liobn; > stt->page_shift = args->page_shift; > @@ -334,24 +328,42 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm, > goto fail; > } > > - kvm_get_kvm(kvm); > + ret = fd = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops, > + stt, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto fail; > > mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); > - list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); > + > + /* Check this LIOBN hasn't been previously allocated */ > + ret = 0; > + list_for_each_entry(siter, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) { > + if (siter->liobn == args->liobn) { > + ret = -EBUSY; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (!ret) { > + list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); > + kvm_get_kvm(kvm); > + } > > mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); > > - return anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops, > - stt, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC); > + if (!ret) > + return fd; > > -fail: > - if (stt) { > - for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) > - if (stt->pages[i]) > - __free_page(stt->pages[i]); > + put_unused_fd(fd); > > - kfree(stt); > - } > + fail: > + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) > + if (stt->pages[i]) > + __free_page(stt->pages[i]); > + > + kfree(stt); > + fail_acct: > + kvmppc_account_memlimit(kvmppc_stt_pages(npages), false); > return ret; > } >
On 24.08.2017 11:14, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Nixiaoming pointed out that there is a memory leak in > kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce() if the call to anon_inode_getfd() > fails; the memory allocated for the kvmppc_spapr_tce_table struct > is not freed, and nor are the pages allocated for the iommu > tables. In addition, we have already incremented the process's > count of locked memory pages, and this doesn't get restored on > error. > > David Hildenbrand pointed out that there is a race in that the > function checks early on that there is not already an entry in the > stt->iommu_tables list with the same LIOBN, but an entry with the > same LIOBN could get added between then and when the new entry is > added to the list. > > This fixes all three problems. To simplify things, we now call > anon_inode_getfd() before placing the new entry in the list. The > check for an existing entry is done while holding the kvm->lock > mutex, immediately before adding the new entry to the list. > Finally, on failure we now call kvmppc_account_memlimit to > decrement the process's count of locked memory pages. > > Reported-by: Nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> > Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> > --- > v2: Don't overwrite stt in loop over spapr_tce_tables > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
On 24.08.2017 11:14, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Nixiaoming pointed out that there is a memory leak in > kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce() if the call to anon_inode_getfd() > fails; the memory allocated for the kvmppc_spapr_tce_table struct is > not freed, and nor are the pages allocated for the iommu tables. In > addition, we have already incremented the process's count of locked > memory pages, and this doesn't get restored on error. > > David Hildenbrand pointed out that there is a race in that the > function checks early on that there is not already an entry in the > stt->iommu_tables list with the same LIOBN, but an entry with the > same LIOBN could get added between then and when the new entry is > added to the list. > > This fixes all three problems. To simplify things, we now call > anon_inode_getfd() before placing the new entry in the list. The > check for an existing entry is done while holding the kvm->lock mutex, > immediately before adding the new entry to the list. > Finally, on failure we now call kvmppc_account_memlimit to decrement > the process's count of locked memory pages. > > Reported-by: Nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> > Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> > --- > v2: Don't overwrite stt in loop over spapr_tce_tables > Reviewed-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c index a160c14..53766e2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c @@ -294,32 +294,26 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_spapr_tce_64 *args) { struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt = NULL; + struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *siter; unsigned long npages, size; int ret = -ENOMEM; int i; + int fd = -1; if (!args->size) return -EINVAL; - /* Check this LIOBN hasn't been previously allocated */ - list_for_each_entry(stt, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) { - if (stt->liobn == args->liobn) - return -EBUSY; - } - size = _ALIGN_UP(args->size, PAGE_SIZE >> 3); npages = kvmppc_tce_pages(size); ret = kvmppc_account_memlimit(kvmppc_stt_pages(npages), true); - if (ret) { - stt = NULL; - goto fail; - } + if (ret) + return ret; ret = -ENOMEM; stt = kzalloc(sizeof(*stt) + npages * sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL); if (!stt) - goto fail; + goto fail_acct; stt->liobn = args->liobn; stt->page_shift = args->page_shift; @@ -334,24 +328,42 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm, goto fail; } - kvm_get_kvm(kvm); + ret = fd = anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops, + stt, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC); + if (ret < 0) + goto fail; mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); - list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); + + /* Check this LIOBN hasn't been previously allocated */ + ret = 0; + list_for_each_entry(siter, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables, list) { + if (siter->liobn == args->liobn) { + ret = -EBUSY; + break; + } + } + + if (!ret) { + list_add_rcu(&stt->list, &kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables); + kvm_get_kvm(kvm); + } mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); - return anon_inode_getfd("kvm-spapr-tce", &kvm_spapr_tce_fops, - stt, O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC); + if (!ret) + return fd; -fail: - if (stt) { - for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) - if (stt->pages[i]) - __free_page(stt->pages[i]); + put_unused_fd(fd); - kfree(stt); - } + fail: + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) + if (stt->pages[i]) + __free_page(stt->pages[i]); + + kfree(stt); + fail_acct: + kvmppc_account_memlimit(kvmppc_stt_pages(npages), false); return ret; }
Nixiaoming pointed out that there is a memory leak in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce() if the call to anon_inode_getfd() fails; the memory allocated for the kvmppc_spapr_tce_table struct is not freed, and nor are the pages allocated for the iommu tables. In addition, we have already incremented the process's count of locked memory pages, and this doesn't get restored on error. David Hildenbrand pointed out that there is a race in that the function checks early on that there is not already an entry in the stt->iommu_tables list with the same LIOBN, but an entry with the same LIOBN could get added between then and when the new entry is added to the list. This fixes all three problems. To simplify things, we now call anon_inode_getfd() before placing the new entry in the list. The check for an existing entry is done while holding the kvm->lock mutex, immediately before adding the new entry to the list. Finally, on failure we now call kvmppc_account_memlimit to decrement the process's count of locked memory pages. Reported-by: Nixiaoming <nixiaoming@huawei.com> Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> --- v2: Don't overwrite stt in loop over spapr_tce_tables arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)