diff mbox

arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits

Message ID 0184EA26B2509940AA629AE1405DD7F2015EA4DE@DGGEMA503-MBX.china.huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Dongjiu Geng Sept. 6, 2017, 2:10 p.m. UTC
Hi, Vladimir

> >> Do you see effect of "PAN is unexpectedly enabled"?
> > In fact I did not encounter this case, but I think it can exist.
> > I think if host OS dynamically disable PAN, it wants the host kernel access the user space address space not through copy_to/from_user
> API.
> > Now if it is unexpectedly enabled, when host kernel still accesses the user space address,  it will happen MMU fault exception.
> 
> And this is expected! The only allowed channel for kernel <-> user is uaccess API.
> 
> I guess that you have test (and that great!) which violates that rule (for testing purpose, why not?) and now you are trying to fit kernel into
> it...


If you think that makes sense for it, we do not consider the paste.PAN in the world-switch.
For the pstate.UAO issue, do you agree my fixing or you have other suggestion?  Also to other reviewer. Thanks.



> 
> Cheers
> Vladimir
> 
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Vladimir
> >>>>
> >>>> .
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> >
> >

Comments

Vladimir Murzin Sept. 6, 2017, 2:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On 06/09/17 15:10, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi, Vladimir
> 
>>>> Do you see effect of "PAN is unexpectedly enabled"?
>>> In fact I did not encounter this case, but I think it can exist.
>>> I think if host OS dynamically disable PAN, it wants the host kernel access the user space address space not through copy_to/from_user
>> API.
>>> Now if it is unexpectedly enabled, when host kernel still accesses the user space address,  it will happen MMU fault exception.
>>
>> And this is expected! The only allowed channel for kernel <-> user is uaccess API.
>>
>> I guess that you have test (and that great!) which violates that rule (for testing purpose, why not?) and now you are trying to fit kernel into
>> it...
> 
> 
> If you think that makes sense for it, we do not consider the paste.PAN in the world-switch.
> For the pstate.UAO issue, do you agree my fixing or you have other suggestion?  Also to other reviewer. Thanks.

It would help if you give precise description on "pstate.UAO issue".

Thanks
Vladimir

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index 9341376..c3dd761 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> 
> +#include <asm/exec.h>
> 
>  /* Yes, this does nothing, on purpose */
>  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_do_nothing(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { }
> 
> @@ -121,8 +123,13 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>         write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->gp_regs.spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1],spsr);
>  }
> 
> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
> +    uao_thread_switch(current);
> +}
> +
>  static hyp_alternate_select(__sysreg_call_restore_host_state,
> -                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
> +                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_restore_state_vhe,
>                             ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
> 
>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_host_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> 
> 
>>
>> Cheers
>> Vladimir
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Vladimir Murzin Sept. 6, 2017, 3:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On 06/09/17 16:08, gengdongjiu wrote:
> It is similar with the PAN,when the guest traps to el2,it will reset the pstate.PAN <http://pstate.PAN> to 0, and continue run。In fact the host pstate.UAO <http://pstate.UAO> can be 1, but guest change it to 0 when trap to EL2。so after swich to host,need to check whether set pstate.UAO <http://pstate.UAO> again。

What negative effect do you see with change UAO to 0 (i.e. do not override)?

P. S.
Please, avoid HTML and top posting

Vladimir

> *发件人:*Vladimir Murzin
> *收件人:*耿东久,marc.zyngier,christoffer.dall@linaro.org,pbonzini@redhat.com,rkrcmar@redhat.com,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,kvm@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,mark.rutland@arm.com,Catalin Marinas
> *抄送:*James Morse,张海斌,黄韶宇
> *时间:*2017-09-06 22:41:09
> *主题:*Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits
> 
> On 06/09/17 15:10, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Hi, Vladimir
>> 
>>>>> Do you see effect of "PAN is unexpectedly enabled"?
>>>> In fact I did not encounter this case, but I think it can exist.
>>>> I think if host OS dynamically disable PAN, it wants the host kernel access the user space address space not through copy_to/from_user
>>> API.
>>>> Now if it is unexpectedly enabled, when host kernel still accesses the user space address,  it will happen MMU fault exception.
>>>
>>> And this is expected! The only allowed channel for kernel <-> user is uaccess API.
>>>
>>> I guess that you have test (and that great!) which violates that rule (for testing purpose, why not?) and now you are trying to fit kernel into
>>> it...
>> 
>> 
>> If you think that makes sense for it, we do not consider the paste.PAN in the world-switch.
>> For the pstate.UAO issue, do you agree my fixing or you have other suggestion?  Also to other reviewer. Thanks.
> 
> It would help if you give precise description on "pstate.UAO issue".
> 
> Thanks
> Vladimir
> 
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> index 9341376..c3dd761 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>>  #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>>  #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
>> 
>> +#include <asm/exec.h>
>> 
>>  /* Yes, this does nothing, on purpose */
>>  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_do_nothing(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { }
>> 
>> @@ -121,8 +123,13 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>>         write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->gp_regs.spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1],spsr);
>>  }
>> 
>> +static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>> +{
>> +    uao_thread_switch(current);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static hyp_alternate_select(__sysreg_call_restore_host_state,
>> -                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
>> +                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_restore_state_vhe,
>>                             ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
>> 
>>  void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_host_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>> 
>> 
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> 
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
index 9341376..c3dd761 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ 
 #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>

+#include <asm/exec.h>

 /* Yes, this does nothing, on purpose */
 static void __hyp_text __sysreg_do_nothing(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt) { }

@@ -121,8 +123,13 @@  static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
        write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->gp_regs.spsr[KVM_SPSR_EL1],spsr);
 }

+static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
+{
+    uao_thread_switch(current);
+}
+
 static hyp_alternate_select(__sysreg_call_restore_host_state,
-                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_do_nothing,
+                           __sysreg_restore_state, __sysreg_restore_state_vhe,
                            ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);

 void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_host_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)