| Message ID | 20170907034254.7180-1-eguan@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to > iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit > 7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found > by code inspection. > Looks good, Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > index c4893e226fd8..812cd17b331f 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ xfs_zero_range( > xfs_off_t count, > bool *did_zero) > { > - return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, NULL, &xfs_iomap_ops); > + return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, did_zero, &xfs_iomap_ops); > } > > int > -- > 2.13.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to > iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit > 7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found > by code inspection. Looks good. Although this makes me wonder why we pass the argument at all, given that it doesn't seem to matter :) Joking aside: xfs_setattr_size seems to care to write out the buffer cache zeroed byes, so this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:42:53AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to > iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit > 7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found > by code inspection. > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> Both look ok, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > index c4893e226fd8..812cd17b331f 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c > @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ xfs_zero_range( > xfs_off_t count, > bool *did_zero) > { > - return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, NULL, &xfs_iomap_ops); > + return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, did_zero, &xfs_iomap_ops); > } > > int > -- > 2.13.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c index c4893e226fd8..812cd17b331f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ xfs_zero_range( xfs_off_t count, bool *did_zero) { - return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, NULL, &xfs_iomap_ops); + return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, did_zero, &xfs_iomap_ops); } int
The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit 7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found by code inspection. Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> --- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)