Message ID | 1506347761-4201-1-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, Ville, trybot also passed for DSI system again : https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_1193/ It did some GEM code on BDW that Vidya can comment but should not be related to this patch. Are we good to merge now, finally and get this machine also back to normal pool? Br, Jani > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Patchwork > Sent: maanantai 25. syyskuuta 2017 17.42 > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Enable scanline read > based on frame timestamps > > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30841/ > State : success > > == Summary == > > Series 30841v1 drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30841/revisions/1/mbox/ > > Test chamelium: > Subgroup dp-edid-read: > pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102672 > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-skl-6770hq) > Test pm_rpm: > Subgroup basic-rte: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-cfl-s) fdo#102294 > Test drv_module_reload: > Subgroup basic-no-display: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-glk-1) fdo#102777 > > fdo#102672 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102672 > fdo#102294 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 > fdo#102777 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102777 > > fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > time:448s > fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 > time:464s > fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 > time:419s > fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 > time:516s > fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 > time:279s > fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:501s > fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 time:486s > fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 > time:491s > fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:223 dwarn:34 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:544s > fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:256 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:6 skip:27 time:645s > fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 > time:416s > fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:259 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:558s > fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > time:423s > fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > time:403s > fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:432s > fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > time:492s > fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:464s > fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24 > time:467s > fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 > time:579s > fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:596s > fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 > time:544s > fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:444s > fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:756s > fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > time:496s > fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > time:473s > fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 > time:568s > fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 > time:413s > > 0b65077382608db179cb5afafecf4a0edd35c2fe drm-tip: 2017y-09m-25d- > 13h-55m-18s UTC integration manifest > 1ac5c013f6d8 drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > > == Logs == > > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm- > tip/Patchwork_5805/ > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>-----Original Message----- >From: Srinivas, Vidya >Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 7:26 PM >To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Syrjala, Ville <ville.syrjala@intel.com>; Kahola, Mika ><mika.kahola@intel.com>; Kamath, Sunil <sunil.kamath@intel.com>; Shankar, >Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; Konduru, Chandra ><chandra.konduru@intel.com>; Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> >Subject: [PATCH v8] drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > >From: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > >For certain platforms on certain encoders, timings are driven from port instead of >pipe. Thus, we can't rely on pipe scanline registers to get the timing information. >Some cases scanline register read will not be functional. >This is causing vblank evasion logic to fail since it relies on scanline, causing >atomic update failure warnings. > >This patch uses pipe framestamp and current timestamp registers to calculate >scanline. This is an indirect way to get the scanline. >It helps resolve atomic update failure for gen9 dsi platforms. > >v2: Addressed Ville and Daniel's review comments. Updated the register MACROs, >handled race condition for register reads, extracted timings from the hwmode. >Removed the dependency on >crtc->config to get the encoder type. > >v3: Made get scanline function generic > >v4: Addressed Ville's review comments. Added a flag to decide timestamp based >scanline reporting. Changed 64bit variables to u32 > >v5: Adressed Ville's review comments. Put the scanline compute function at the >place of caller. Removed hwmode flags from uapi and used a local >i915 data structure instead. > >v6: Used vblank hwmode to get the timings. > >v7: Fixed sparse warnings, indentation and minor review comments. > >v8: Limited this only for Gen9 DSI. > This patch is passing on try-bot. Below are the results. Series: drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps (rev5) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30575/ State : success This can be taken for merge now. Thanks Ville for the support on this one. Regards, Uma Shankar >Credits-to: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> >Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> >Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@intel.com> >Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> >Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 54 >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 8 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c >index 91a2c5d..0d3fa70 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c >@@ -772,6 +772,57 @@ static u32 g4x_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device >*dev, unsigned int pipe) > return I915_READ(PIPE_FRMCOUNT_G4X(pipe)); > } > >+/* >+ * On certain encoders on certain platforms, pipe >+ * scanline register will not work to get the scanline, >+ * since the timings are driven from the PORT or issues >+ * with scanline register updates. >+ * This function will use Framestamp and current >+ * timestamp registers to calculate the scanline. >+ */ >+static u32 __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(struct intel_crtc >+*crtc) { >+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); >+ struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = >+ &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; >+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &vblank->hwmode; >+ u32 vblank_start = mode->crtc_vblank_start; >+ u32 vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; >+ u32 htotal = mode->crtc_htotal; >+ u32 clock = mode->crtc_clock; >+ u32 scanline, scan_prev_time, scan_curr_time, scan_post_time; >+ >+ /* >+ * To avoid the race condition where we might cross into the >+ * next vblank just between the PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and TIMESTAMP_CTR >+ * reads. We make sure we read PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and >TIMESTAMP_CTR >+ * during the same frame. >+ */ >+ do { >+ /* >+ * This field provides read back of the display >+ * pipe frame time stamp. The time stamp value >+ * is sampled at every start of vertical blank. >+ */ >+ scan_prev_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc- >>pipe)); >+ >+ /* >+ * The TIMESTAMP_CTR register has the current >+ * time stamp value. >+ */ >+ scan_curr_time = I915_READ_FW(IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR); >+ >+ scan_post_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc- >>pipe)); >+ } while (scan_post_time != scan_prev_time); >+ >+ scanline = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(scan_curr_time - scan_prev_time, >+ clock), 1000 * htotal); >+ scanline = min(scanline, vtotal - 1); >+ scanline = (scanline + vblank_start) % vtotal; >+ >+ return scanline; >+} >+ > /* I915_READ_FW, only for fast reads of display block, no need for forcewake >etc. */ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) { @@ -788,6 >+839,9 @@ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > vblank = &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; > mode = &vblank->hwmode; > >+ if (mode->private_flags & >I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP) >+ return __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(crtc); >+ > vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; > if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > vtotal /= 2; >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >index 9f03cd0..fbd00cc 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h >@@ -8804,6 +8804,15 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define MIPIO_TXESC_CLK_DIV2 _MMIO(0x160008) > #define GLK_TX_ESC_CLK_DIV2_MASK 0x3FF > >+/* Gen4+ Timestamp and Pipe Frame time stamp registers */ >+#define GEN4_TIMESTAMP _MMIO(0x2358) >+#define ILK_TIMESTAMP_HI _MMIO(0x70070) >+#define IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR _MMIO(0x44070) >+ >+#define _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A 0x70048 >+#define PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(pipe) \ >+ _MMIO_PIPE2(pipe, _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A) >+ > /* BXT MIPI clock controls */ > #define BXT_MAX_VAR_OUTPUT_KHZ 39500 > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >index 3078076..4170490 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state { > > /* drm_mode->private_flags */ > #define I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED 1 >+/* Flag to get scanline using frame time stamps */ #define >+I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP (1<<1) > > struct intel_pipe_wm { > struct intel_wm_level wm[5]; >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >index 578254a..20a7b00 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >@@ -330,6 +330,10 @@ static bool intel_dsi_compute_config(struct >intel_encoder *encoder, > adjusted_mode->flags = 0; > > if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) { >+ /* Enable Frame time stamp based scanline reporting */ >+ adjusted_mode->private_flags |= >+ I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; >+ > /* Dual link goes to DSI transcoder A. */ > if (intel_dsi->ports == BIT(PORT_C)) > pipe_config->cpu_transcoder = TRANSCODER_DSI_C; >@@ -1102,6 +1106,10 @@ static void bxt_dsi_get_pipe_config(struct >intel_encoder *encoder, > pixel_format_from_register_bits(fmt)); > bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp; > >+ /* Enable Frame time stamo based scanline reporting */ >+ adjusted_mode->private_flags |= >+ I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; >+ > /* In terms of pixels */ > adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay = > I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_HACTIVE(port)); >-- >1.7.9.5
HI, > -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Saarinen, Jani > Sent: maanantai 25. syyskuuta 2017 19.34 > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Srinivas, Vidya > <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>; Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Enable scanline > read based on frame timestamps > > Hi, > Ville, trybot also passed for DSI system again : https://intel-gfx- > ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_1193/ > It did hit some GEM code on BDW that Vidya can comment but should not be > related to this patch. Now trybot passed on second run: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_1195/ I guess good enough? > Are we good to merge now, finally and get this machine also back to normal > pool? > > Br, > Jani > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On > > Behalf Of Patchwork > > Sent: maanantai 25. syyskuuta 2017 17.42 > > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Enable > > scanline read based on frame timestamps > > > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/30841/ > > State : success > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 30841v1 drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame > > timestamps > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/30841/revisions/1/mbo > > x/ > > > > Test chamelium: > > Subgroup dp-edid-read: > > pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102672 > > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-skl-6770hq) > > Test pm_rpm: > > Subgroup basic-rte: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (fi-cfl-s) fdo#102294 > > Test drv_module_reload: > > Subgroup basic-no-display: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-glk-1) fdo#102777 > > > > fdo#102672 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102672 > > fdo#102294 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 > > fdo#102777 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102777 > > > > fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > > time:448s > > fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 > > time:464s > > fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:224 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 > > time:419s > > fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 > > time:516s > > fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:184 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 > > time:279s > > fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 > time:501s > > fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:254 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34 > time:486s > > fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 > > time:491s > > fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:223 dwarn:34 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:544s > > fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:256 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:6 skip:27 time:645s > > fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:230 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 > > time:416s > > fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:259 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:558s > > fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > > time:423s > > fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > > time:403s > > fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:432s > > fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > > time:492s > > fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > time:464s > > fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24 > > time:467s > > fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 > > time:579s > > fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:596s > > fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 > > time:544s > > fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > time:444s > > fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 > time:756s > > fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 > > time:496s > > fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > > time:473s > > fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38 > > time:568s > > fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 > > time:413s > > > > 0b65077382608db179cb5afafecf4a0edd35c2fe drm-tip: 2017y-09m-25d- > > 13h-55m-18s UTC integration manifest > > 1ac5c013f6d8 drm/i915: Enable scanline read based on frame timestamps > > > > == Logs == > > > > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm- > > tip/Patchwork_5805 Jani Saarinen Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> wrote: > From: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > > For certain platforms on certain encoders, timings are driven > from port instead of pipe. Thus, we can't rely on pipe scanline > registers to get the timing information. Some cases scanline > register read will not be functional. > This is causing vblank evasion logic to fail since it relies on > scanline, causing atomic update failure warnings. > > This patch uses pipe framestamp and current timestamp registers > to calculate scanline. This is an indirect way to get the scanline. > It helps resolve atomic update failure for gen9 dsi platforms. > > v2: Addressed Ville and Daniel's review comments. Updated the > register MACROs, handled race condition for register reads, > extracted timings from the hwmode. Removed the dependency on > crtc->config to get the encoder type. > > v3: Made get scanline function generic > > v4: Addressed Ville's review comments. Added a flag to decide timestamp > based scanline reporting. Changed 64bit variables to u32 > > v5: Adressed Ville's review comments. Put the scanline compute function > at the place of caller. Removed hwmode flags from uapi and used a local > i915 data structure instead. > > v6: Used vblank hwmode to get the timings. > > v7: Fixed sparse warnings, indentation and minor review comments. > > v8: Limited this only for Gen9 DSI. > > Credits-to: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Pushed to dinq, thanks for the patch and review. BR, Jani. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 8 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > index 91a2c5d..0d3fa70 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > @@ -772,6 +772,57 @@ static u32 g4x_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe) > return I915_READ(PIPE_FRMCOUNT_G4X(pipe)); > } > > +/* > + * On certain encoders on certain platforms, pipe > + * scanline register will not work to get the scanline, > + * since the timings are driven from the PORT or issues > + * with scanline register updates. > + * This function will use Framestamp and current > + * timestamp registers to calculate the scanline. > + */ > +static u32 __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > +{ > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = > + &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &vblank->hwmode; > + u32 vblank_start = mode->crtc_vblank_start; > + u32 vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; > + u32 htotal = mode->crtc_htotal; > + u32 clock = mode->crtc_clock; > + u32 scanline, scan_prev_time, scan_curr_time, scan_post_time; > + > + /* > + * To avoid the race condition where we might cross into the > + * next vblank just between the PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and TIMESTAMP_CTR > + * reads. We make sure we read PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and TIMESTAMP_CTR > + * during the same frame. > + */ > + do { > + /* > + * This field provides read back of the display > + * pipe frame time stamp. The time stamp value > + * is sampled at every start of vertical blank. > + */ > + scan_prev_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc->pipe)); > + > + /* > + * The TIMESTAMP_CTR register has the current > + * time stamp value. > + */ > + scan_curr_time = I915_READ_FW(IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR); > + > + scan_post_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc->pipe)); > + } while (scan_post_time != scan_prev_time); > + > + scanline = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(scan_curr_time - scan_prev_time, > + clock), 1000 * htotal); > + scanline = min(scanline, vtotal - 1); > + scanline = (scanline + vblank_start) % vtotal; > + > + return scanline; > +} > + > /* I915_READ_FW, only for fast reads of display block, no need for forcewake etc. */ > static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > { > @@ -788,6 +839,9 @@ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > vblank = &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; > mode = &vblank->hwmode; > > + if (mode->private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP) > + return __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(crtc); > + > vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; > if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > vtotal /= 2; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 9f03cd0..fbd00cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -8804,6 +8804,15 @@ enum skl_power_gate { > #define MIPIO_TXESC_CLK_DIV2 _MMIO(0x160008) > #define GLK_TX_ESC_CLK_DIV2_MASK 0x3FF > > +/* Gen4+ Timestamp and Pipe Frame time stamp registers */ > +#define GEN4_TIMESTAMP _MMIO(0x2358) > +#define ILK_TIMESTAMP_HI _MMIO(0x70070) > +#define IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR _MMIO(0x44070) > + > +#define _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A 0x70048 > +#define PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(pipe) \ > + _MMIO_PIPE2(pipe, _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A) > + > /* BXT MIPI clock controls */ > #define BXT_MAX_VAR_OUTPUT_KHZ 39500 > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > index 3078076..4170490 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > @@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state { > > /* drm_mode->private_flags */ > #define I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED 1 > +/* Flag to get scanline using frame time stamps */ > +#define I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP (1<<1) > > struct intel_pipe_wm { > struct intel_wm_level wm[5]; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > index 578254a..20a7b00 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > @@ -330,6 +330,10 @@ static bool intel_dsi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > adjusted_mode->flags = 0; > > if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) { > + /* Enable Frame time stamp based scanline reporting */ > + adjusted_mode->private_flags |= > + I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; > + > /* Dual link goes to DSI transcoder A. */ > if (intel_dsi->ports == BIT(PORT_C)) > pipe_config->cpu_transcoder = TRANSCODER_DSI_C; > @@ -1102,6 +1106,10 @@ static void bxt_dsi_get_pipe_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > pixel_format_from_register_bits(fmt)); > bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp; > > + /* Enable Frame time stamo based scanline reporting */ > + adjusted_mode->private_flags |= > + I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; > + > /* In terms of pixels */ > adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay = > I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_HACTIVE(port));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 91a2c5d..0d3fa70 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -772,6 +772,57 @@ static u32 g4x_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe) return I915_READ(PIPE_FRMCOUNT_G4X(pipe)); } +/* + * On certain encoders on certain platforms, pipe + * scanline register will not work to get the scanline, + * since the timings are driven from the PORT or issues + * with scanline register updates. + * This function will use Framestamp and current + * timestamp registers to calculate the scanline. + */ +static u32 __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(struct intel_crtc *crtc) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = + &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; + const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &vblank->hwmode; + u32 vblank_start = mode->crtc_vblank_start; + u32 vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; + u32 htotal = mode->crtc_htotal; + u32 clock = mode->crtc_clock; + u32 scanline, scan_prev_time, scan_curr_time, scan_post_time; + + /* + * To avoid the race condition where we might cross into the + * next vblank just between the PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and TIMESTAMP_CTR + * reads. We make sure we read PIPE_FRMTMSTMP and TIMESTAMP_CTR + * during the same frame. + */ + do { + /* + * This field provides read back of the display + * pipe frame time stamp. The time stamp value + * is sampled at every start of vertical blank. + */ + scan_prev_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc->pipe)); + + /* + * The TIMESTAMP_CTR register has the current + * time stamp value. + */ + scan_curr_time = I915_READ_FW(IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR); + + scan_post_time = I915_READ_FW(PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(crtc->pipe)); + } while (scan_post_time != scan_prev_time); + + scanline = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(scan_curr_time - scan_prev_time, + clock), 1000 * htotal); + scanline = min(scanline, vtotal - 1); + scanline = (scanline + vblank_start) % vtotal; + + return scanline; +} + /* I915_READ_FW, only for fast reads of display block, no need for forcewake etc. */ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) { @@ -788,6 +839,9 @@ static int __intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc) vblank = &crtc->base.dev->vblank[drm_crtc_index(&crtc->base)]; mode = &vblank->hwmode; + if (mode->private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP) + return __intel_get_crtc_scanline_from_timestamp(crtc); + vtotal = mode->crtc_vtotal; if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) vtotal /= 2; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 9f03cd0..fbd00cc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -8804,6 +8804,15 @@ enum skl_power_gate { #define MIPIO_TXESC_CLK_DIV2 _MMIO(0x160008) #define GLK_TX_ESC_CLK_DIV2_MASK 0x3FF +/* Gen4+ Timestamp and Pipe Frame time stamp registers */ +#define GEN4_TIMESTAMP _MMIO(0x2358) +#define ILK_TIMESTAMP_HI _MMIO(0x70070) +#define IVB_TIMESTAMP_CTR _MMIO(0x44070) + +#define _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A 0x70048 +#define PIPE_FRMTMSTMP(pipe) \ + _MMIO_PIPE2(pipe, _PIPE_FRMTMSTMP_A) + /* BXT MIPI clock controls */ #define BXT_MAX_VAR_OUTPUT_KHZ 39500 diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h index 3078076..4170490 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state { /* drm_mode->private_flags */ #define I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED 1 +/* Flag to get scanline using frame time stamps */ +#define I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP (1<<1) struct intel_pipe_wm { struct intel_wm_level wm[5]; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c index 578254a..20a7b00 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c @@ -330,6 +330,10 @@ static bool intel_dsi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, adjusted_mode->flags = 0; if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) { + /* Enable Frame time stamp based scanline reporting */ + adjusted_mode->private_flags |= + I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; + /* Dual link goes to DSI transcoder A. */ if (intel_dsi->ports == BIT(PORT_C)) pipe_config->cpu_transcoder = TRANSCODER_DSI_C; @@ -1102,6 +1106,10 @@ static void bxt_dsi_get_pipe_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, pixel_format_from_register_bits(fmt)); bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp; + /* Enable Frame time stamo based scanline reporting */ + adjusted_mode->private_flags |= + I915_MODE_FLAG_GET_SCANLINE_FROM_TIMESTAMP; + /* In terms of pixels */ adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay = I915_READ(BXT_MIPI_TRANS_HACTIVE(port));