| Message ID | 1877076.QiUpNxchJO@aspire.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set > in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by s/explcitly/explicitly/ > their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be > resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> I think your previous patches to this file mostly used a "PCI / PM" subject line prefix (as opposed to the "PM / PCI" here). But maybe the difference means something? > --- > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > @@ -680,13 +680,6 @@ static int pci_pm_prepare(struct device > { > struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver; > > - /* > - * Devices having power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for > - * suspending their children in the next phase of device suspend. > - */ > - if (dev->power.ignore_children) > - pm_runtime_resume(dev); > - > if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->prepare) { > int error = drv->pm->prepare(dev); > if (error) >
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set > in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by > their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be > resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Oh, and I meant to also say that you've merged the PM-related things here in the past, so I assume you'll take this one :) > --- > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > @@ -680,13 +680,6 @@ static int pci_pm_prepare(struct device > { > struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver; > > - /* > - * Devices having power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for > - * suspending their children in the next phase of device suspend. > - */ > - if (dev->power.ignore_children) > - pm_runtime_resume(dev); > - > if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->prepare) { > int error = drv->pm->prepare(dev); > if (error) >
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> >> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set >> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by > > s/explcitly/explicitly/ Yup. >> their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be >> resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > I think your previous patches to this file mostly used a "PCI / PM" > subject line prefix (as opposed to the "PM / PCI" here). But maybe > the difference means something? No, it doesn't. I'll change it to match the previous ones. :-) Thanks, Rafael
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:33:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> >> It should not be necessary to resume devices with ignore_children set >> in pci_pm_prepare(), because they should be resumed explcitly by >> their children drivers during suspend if need be and they will be >> resumed by pci_pm_suspend() after that anyway, so avoid doing that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Oh, and I meant to also say that you've merged the PM-related things > here in the past, so I assume you'll take this one :) I will. :-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -680,13 +680,6 @@ static int pci_pm_prepare(struct device { struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver; - /* - * Devices having power.ignore_children set may still be necessary for - * suspending their children in the next phase of device suspend. - */ - if (dev->power.ignore_children) - pm_runtime_resume(dev); - if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->prepare) { int error = drv->pm->prepare(dev); if (error)