Message ID | 20171003104845.10417-6-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On 10/03/2017 12:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > As a user of bsg-lib the SAS transport should not poke into request > internals but use the bsg_job fields instead. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cheers, Hannes
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c index 319dff970237..736a1f4f9676 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int sas_smp_dispatch(struct bsg_job *job) if (!scsi_is_host_device(job->dev)) rphy = dev_to_rphy(job->dev); - if (!job->req->next_rq) { + if (!job->reply_payload.payload_len) { dev_warn(job->dev, "space for a smp response is missing\n"); bsg_job_done(job, -EINVAL, 0); return 0;
As a user of bsg-lib the SAS transport should not poke into request internals but use the bsg_job fields instead. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)