diff mbox

[v2,06/11] drm/i915: Name i915_runtime_pm structure in dev_priv as "rpm"

Message ID 1507292020-14212-7-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 6, 2017, 12:13 p.m. UTC 
We were using dev_priv->pm for runtime power management related state.
This patch renames it to "rpm" which looks more apt. Will be using pm
for state containing RPS/RC6 state in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         |  8 ++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c   |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         |  8 ++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h        | 10 +++++-----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 10 +++++-----
 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Comments

Chris Wilson Oct. 6, 2017, 12:40 p.m. UTC | #1 
Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-06 13:13:35)
> We were using dev_priv->pm for runtime power management related state.
> This patch renames it to "rpm" which looks more apt. Will be using pm
> for state containing RPS/RC6 state in the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Thinking about this again, rpm, pm are very close. How about if we used
i915->runtime_pm and i915->gt_pm (or i915->gt.pm)? Imre, any thoughts?
-Chris
sagar.a.kamble@intel.com Oct. 6, 2017, 3 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 10/6/2017 6:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-10-06 13:13:35)
>> We were using dev_priv->pm for runtime power management related state.
>> This patch renames it to "rpm" which looks more apt. Will be using pm
>> for state containing RPS/RC6 state in the next patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Thinking about this again, rpm, pm are very close. How about if we used
> i915->runtime_pm and i915->gt_pm (or i915->gt.pm)? Imre, any thoughts?
rps.hw_lock/pcu_lock is used by display too, so I just kept it pm. 
should we pull rps.hw_lock/pcu_lock out into drm_i915_private
and then gt_pm would be good.
> -Chris
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 66fc156..a365860 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -2544,12 +2544,12 @@  static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
 	intel_uncore_suspend(dev_priv);
 
 	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count));
 
 	if (intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(dev_priv))
 		DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed access detected prior to suspending\n");
 
-	dev_priv->pm.suspended = true;
+	dev_priv->rpm.suspended = true;
 
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: We really should find a document that references the arguments
@@ -2595,11 +2595,11 @@  static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
 
 	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Resuming device\n");
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count));
 	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
 
 	intel_opregion_notify_adapter(dev_priv, PCI_D0);
-	dev_priv->pm.suspended = false;
+	dev_priv->rpm.suspended = false;
 	if (intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))
 		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Unclaimed access during suspend, bios?\n");
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1fc7080..7313312 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@  struct drm_i915_private {
 		bool distrust_bios_wm;
 	} wm;
 
-	struct i915_runtime_pm pm;
+	struct i915_runtime_pm rpm;
 
 	struct {
 		bool initialized;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index dc91b32..635002a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -1674,8 +1674,8 @@  static void i915_capture_gen_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				   struct i915_gpu_state *error)
 {
 	error->awake = dev_priv->gt.awake;
-	error->wakelock = atomic_read(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
-	error->suspended = dev_priv->pm.suspended;
+	error->wakelock = atomic_read(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
+	error->suspended = dev_priv->rpm.suspended;
 
 	error->iommu = -1;
 #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index de77713..d5953a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -4178,7 +4178,7 @@  int intel_irq_install(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * interrupts as enabled _before_ actually enabling them to avoid
 	 * special cases in our ordering checks.
 	 */
-	dev_priv->pm.irqs_enabled = true;
+	dev_priv->rpm.irqs_enabled = true;
 
 	return drm_irq_install(&dev_priv->drm, dev_priv->drm.pdev->irq);
 }
@@ -4194,7 +4194,7 @@  void intel_irq_uninstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	drm_irq_uninstall(&dev_priv->drm);
 	intel_hpd_cancel_work(dev_priv);
-	dev_priv->pm.irqs_enabled = false;
+	dev_priv->rpm.irqs_enabled = false;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4207,7 +4207,7 @@  void intel_irq_uninstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 void intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	dev_priv->drm.driver->irq_uninstall(&dev_priv->drm);
-	dev_priv->pm.irqs_enabled = false;
+	dev_priv->rpm.irqs_enabled = false;
 	synchronize_irq(dev_priv->drm.irq);
 }
 
@@ -4220,7 +4220,7 @@  void intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  */
 void intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	dev_priv->pm.irqs_enabled = true;
+	dev_priv->rpm.irqs_enabled = true;
 	dev_priv->drm.driver->irq_preinstall(&dev_priv->drm);
 	dev_priv->drm.driver->irq_postinstall(&dev_priv->drm);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 0cab667..b5bfddd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@  static inline bool intel_irqs_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * We only use drm_irq_uninstall() at unload and VT switch, so
 	 * this is the only thing we need to check.
 	 */
-	return dev_priv->pm.irqs_enabled;
+	return dev_priv->rpm.irqs_enabled;
 }
 
 int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc);
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@  void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static inline void
 assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	WARN_ONCE(dev_priv->pm.suspended,
+	WARN_ONCE(dev_priv->rpm.suspended,
 		  "Device suspended during HW access\n");
 }
 
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@  void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 assert_rpm_wakelock_held(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	assert_rpm_device_not_suspended(dev_priv);
-	WARN_ONCE(!atomic_read(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count),
+	WARN_ONCE(!atomic_read(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count),
 		  "RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access");
 }
 
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@  void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static inline void
 disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@  void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static inline void
 enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_dec(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 }
 
 void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 843fdc7..2ad6ebf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -9350,8 +9350,8 @@  void intel_pm_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 			  __intel_autoenable_gt_powersave);
 	atomic_set(&dev_priv->rps.num_waiters, 0);
 
-	dev_priv->pm.suspended = false;
-	atomic_set(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count, 0);
+	dev_priv->rpm.suspended = false;
+	atomic_set(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count, 0);
 }
 
 static u64 vlv_residency_raw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
index 3791c3f..a37ad0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@  bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
 	bool is_enabled;
 
-	if (dev_priv->pm.suspended)
+	if (dev_priv->rpm.suspended)
 		return false;
 
 	is_enabled = true;
@@ -3128,7 +3128,7 @@  void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev);
 	WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed: %d\n", ret);
 
-	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
 }
 
@@ -3162,7 +3162,7 @@  bool intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 			return false;
 	}
 
-	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
 
 	return true;
@@ -3193,7 +3193,7 @@  void intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
 	pm_runtime_get_noresume(kdev);
 
-	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_inc(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3210,7 +3210,7 @@  void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	struct device *kdev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
-	atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
+	atomic_dec(&dev_priv->rpm.wakeref_count);
 
 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev);
 	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(kdev);