Message ID | 20171017084450.4365-1-shuwang@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Rejected |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:44:50PM +0800, shuwang@redhat.com wrote: > From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> > > Fix kernel warning on my 4cpus 2core_id system. The cpu0 and cpu1 have > same core_id 0, so both cpu0 and cpu1 will try to create file temp2_label > when it's online. > What system/cpu is that ? Normally I would assume that each CPU (package) instantiates a separate instance of the driver. > - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=0) > - create_core_data(cpu=0, attr_no=2) > - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=1) > - create_core_data(cpu=1, attr_no=2) > - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > > $ grep -e processor -e 'core id' /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > core id : 0 > processor : 1 > core id : 0 > processor : 2 > core id : 1 > processor : 3 > core id : 1 Complete output of /proc/cpuinfo might be helpful. > > dmesg: > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/platform/coretemp.0/hwmon/hwmon3/temp2_label' > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/platform/coretemp.0/hwmon/hwmon3/temp3_label' > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 27 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x58/0x70 > Call Trace: > sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x170/0x180 > internal_create_group+0xe3/0x2c0 > sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 > create_core_data+0x3ab/0x5e0 [coretemp] > coretemp_cpu_online+0x14b/0x1f7 [coretemp] > ? create_core_data+0x5e0/0x5e0 [coretemp] > cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xae/0x5c0 > ? __schedule+0x295/0x880 > cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcb/0x170 > smpboot_thread_fn+0x110/0x160 > > Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > index c13a4fd86b3c..2fb29ab1080b 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > @@ -459,6 +459,17 @@ static struct temp_data *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) > return tdata; > } > > +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) > +{ > + struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; > + > + /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ > + sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); > + > + kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); > + pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; > +} > + > static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, > int pkg_flag) > { > @@ -479,6 +490,10 @@ static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, > if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1) > return -ERANGE; > > + tdata = pdata->core_data[attr_no]; > + if (tdata != NULL) > + coretemp_remove_core(pdata, attr_no); > + That looks more like a hack than a fix. Presumably the other cpu/core is still online ? > tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag); > if (!tdata) > return -ENOMEM; > @@ -527,17 +542,6 @@ coretemp_add_core(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu); > } > > -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) > -{ > - struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; > - > - /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ > - sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); > - > - kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); > - pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; > -} > - > static int coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > -- > 2.13.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> > To: shuwang@redhat.com > Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 11:25:50 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same core id > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:44:50PM +0800, shuwang@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> > > > > Fix kernel warning on my 4cpus 2core_id system. The cpu0 and cpu1 have > > same core_id 0, so both cpu0 and cpu1 will try to create file temp2_label > > when it's online. > > > What system/cpu is that ? > > Normally I would assume that each CPU (package) instantiates > a separate instance of the driver. The system is ThinkPad X1 Carbon 3rd laptop, model 20BTS1N70F. > > > - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=0) > > - create_core_data(cpu=0, attr_no=2) > > - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > > - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=1) > > - create_core_data(cpu=1, attr_no=2) > > - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > > > > $ grep -e processor -e 'core id' /proc/cpuinfo > > processor : 0 > > core id : 0 > > processor : 1 > > core id : 0 > > processor : 2 > > core id : 1 > > processor : 3 > > core id : 1 > > Complete output of /proc/cpuinfo might be helpful. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 61 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz stepping : 4 microcode : 0x25 cpu MHz : 2593.949 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 20 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts bugs : bogomips : 5187.89 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 61 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz stepping : 4 microcode : 0x25 cpu MHz : 2593.949 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 20 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts bugs : bogomips : 5209.02 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 2 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 61 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz stepping : 4 microcode : 0x25 cpu MHz : 2593.949 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 2 initial apicid : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 20 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts bugs : bogomips : 5201.77 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 61 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz stepping : 4 microcode : 0x25 cpu MHz : 2593.949 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 1 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 3 initial apicid : 3 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 20 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap xsaveopt dtherm ida arat pln pts bugs : bogomips : 5202.42 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: > > > > > dmesg: > > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename > > '/devices/platform/coretemp.0/hwmon/hwmon3/temp2_label' > > sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename > > '/devices/platform/coretemp.0/hwmon/hwmon3/temp3_label' > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 27 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x58/0x70 > > Call Trace: > > sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x170/0x180 > > internal_create_group+0xe3/0x2c0 > > sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 > > create_core_data+0x3ab/0x5e0 [coretemp] > > coretemp_cpu_online+0x14b/0x1f7 [coretemp] > > ? create_core_data+0x5e0/0x5e0 [coretemp] > > cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xae/0x5c0 > > ? __schedule+0x295/0x880 > > cpuhp_thread_fun+0xcb/0x170 > > smpboot_thread_fn+0x110/0x160 > > > > Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > > index c13a4fd86b3c..2fb29ab1080b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c > > @@ -459,6 +459,17 @@ static struct temp_data *init_temp_data(unsigned int > > cpu, int pkg_flag) > > return tdata; > > } > > > > +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) > > +{ > > + struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; > > + > > + /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ > > + sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); > > + > > + kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); > > + pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; > > +} > > + > > static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int > > cpu, > > int pkg_flag) > > { > > @@ -479,6 +490,10 @@ static int create_core_data(struct platform_device > > *pdev, unsigned int cpu, > > if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1) > > return -ERANGE; > > > > + tdata = pdata->core_data[attr_no]; > > + if (tdata != NULL) > > + coretemp_remove_core(pdata, attr_no); > > + > > That looks more like a hack than a fix. Presumably the other cpu/core > is still online ? > > > tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag); > > if (!tdata) > > return -ENOMEM; > > @@ -527,17 +542,6 @@ coretemp_add_core(struct platform_device *pdev, > > unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu); > > } > > > > -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) > > -{ > > - struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; > > - > > - /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ > > - sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); > > - > > - kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); > > - pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; > > -} > > - > > static int coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > -- > > 2.13.5 > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/17/2017 08:21 PM, Shu Wang wrote: >> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> >> To: shuwang@redhat.com >> Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com >> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 11:25:50 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same core id >> >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:44:50PM +0800, shuwang@redhat.com wrote: >>> From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> >>> >>> Fix kernel warning on my 4cpus 2core_id system. The cpu0 and cpu1 have >>> same core_id 0, so both cpu0 and cpu1 will try to create file temp2_label >>> when it's online. >>> >> What system/cpu is that ? >> >> Normally I would assume that each CPU (package) instantiates >> a separate instance of the driver. > > The system is ThinkPad X1 Carbon 3rd laptop, model 20BTS1N70F. > >> >>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=0) >>> - create_core_data(cpu=0, attr_no=2) >>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) >>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=1) >>> - create_core_data(cpu=1, attr_no=2) >>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) >>> >>> $ grep -e processor -e 'core id' /proc/cpuinfo >>> processor : 0 >>> core id : 0 >>> processor : 1 >>> core id : 0 >>> processor : 2 >>> core id : 1 >>> processor : 3 >>> core id : 1 >> >> Complete output of /proc/cpuinfo might be helpful. > > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 61 > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz This is a hyperthreading CPU, which should already be handled, and the problem would affect pretty much everyone. I'll have to look into this more closely. Is this with the ToT kernel ? Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> > To: "Shu Wang" <shuwang@redhat.com> > Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 9:14:39 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same core id > > On 10/17/2017 08:21 PM, Shu Wang wrote: > >> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> > >> To: shuwang@redhat.com > >> Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, > >> linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 11:25:50 PM > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same > >> core id > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:44:50PM +0800, shuwang@redhat.com wrote: > >>> From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> > >>> > >>> Fix kernel warning on my 4cpus 2core_id system. The cpu0 and cpu1 have > >>> same core_id 0, so both cpu0 and cpu1 will try to create file temp2_label > >>> when it's online. > >>> > >> What system/cpu is that ? > >> > >> Normally I would assume that each CPU (package) instantiates > >> a separate instance of the driver. > > > > The system is ThinkPad X1 Carbon 3rd laptop, model 20BTS1N70F. > > > >> > >>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=0) > >>> - create_core_data(cpu=0, attr_no=2) > >>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > >>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=1) > >>> - create_core_data(cpu=1, attr_no=2) > >>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) > >>> > >>> $ grep -e processor -e 'core id' /proc/cpuinfo > >>> processor : 0 > >>> core id : 0 > >>> processor : 1 > >>> core id : 0 > >>> processor : 2 > >>> core id : 1 > >>> processor : 3 > >>> core id : 1 > >> > >> Complete output of /proc/cpuinfo might be helpful. > > > > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo > > processor : 0 > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > > cpu family : 6 > > model : 61 > > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz > > This is a hyperthreading CPU, which should already be handled, Do you mean that for my system, coretemp_cpu_online should only be called twice instead of four times to create two core attrs? > and the problem would affect pretty much everyone. I'll have > to look into this more closely. Is this with the ToT kernel ? What's a ToT kernel? The kernel I built was the latest kernel-4.14.0_rc5+ from linus repo. > > Guenter > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/18/2017 07:28 PM, Shu Wang wrote: >> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> >> To: "Shu Wang" <shuwang@redhat.com> >> Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com >> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 9:14:39 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same core id >> >> On 10/17/2017 08:21 PM, Shu Wang wrote: >>>> From: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net> >>>> To: shuwang@redhat.com >>>> Cc: "fenghua yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, jdelvare@suse.com, >>>> linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, >>>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuhu@redhat.com, yizhan@redhat.com >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 11:25:50 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (coretemp) remove duplicated coretemp for same >>>> core id >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:44:50PM +0800, shuwang@redhat.com wrote: >>>>> From: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com> >>>>> >>>>> Fix kernel warning on my 4cpus 2core_id system. The cpu0 and cpu1 have >>>>> same core_id 0, so both cpu0 and cpu1 will try to create file temp2_label >>>>> when it's online. >>>>> >>>> What system/cpu is that ? >>>> >>>> Normally I would assume that each CPU (package) instantiates >>>> a separate instance of the driver. >>> >>> The system is ThinkPad X1 Carbon 3rd laptop, model 20BTS1N70F. >>> >>>> >>>>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=0) >>>>> - create_core_data(cpu=0, attr_no=2) >>>>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) >>>>> - coretemp_cpu_online(cpu=1) >>>>> - create_core_data(cpu=1, attr_no=2) >>>>> - create_core_attrs(attr_no=2) >>>>> >>>>> $ grep -e processor -e 'core id' /proc/cpuinfo >>>>> processor : 0 >>>>> core id : 0 >>>>> processor : 1 >>>>> core id : 0 >>>>> processor : 2 >>>>> core id : 1 >>>>> processor : 3 >>>>> core id : 1 >>>> >>>> Complete output of /proc/cpuinfo might be helpful. >>> >>> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo >>> processor : 0 >>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >>> cpu family : 6 >>> model : 61 >>> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5600U CPU @ 2.60GHz >> >> This is a hyperthreading CPU, which should already be handled, > > Do you mean that for my system, coretemp_cpu_online should only > be called twice instead of four times to create two core attrs? > coretemp_add_core() should only be called twice, and cpumask_intersects() should filter out the duplicate ones. /* * Check whether a thread sibling is already online. If not add the * interface for this CPU core. */ if (!cpumask_intersects(&pdata->cpumask, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu))) coretemp_add_core(pdev, cpu, 0); Thomas, is it possible that something is wrong with this code ? Guenter >> and the problem would affect pretty much everyone. I'll have >> to look into this more closely. Is this with the ToT kernel ? > > What's a ToT kernel? The kernel I built was the latest > kernel-4.14.0_rc5+ from linus repo. > ToT => Top Of Tree. My apologies, I thought that was a commonly used acronym. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c index c13a4fd86b3c..2fb29ab1080b 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c @@ -459,6 +459,17 @@ static struct temp_data *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) return tdata; } +static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) +{ + struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; + + /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ + sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); + + kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); + pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; +} + static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) { @@ -479,6 +490,10 @@ static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, if (attr_no > MAX_CORE_DATA - 1) return -ERANGE; + tdata = pdata->core_data[attr_no]; + if (tdata != NULL) + coretemp_remove_core(pdata, attr_no); + tdata = init_temp_data(cpu, pkg_flag); if (!tdata) return -ENOMEM; @@ -527,17 +542,6 @@ coretemp_add_core(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag) dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Adding Core %u failed\n", cpu); } -static void coretemp_remove_core(struct platform_data *pdata, int indx) -{ - struct temp_data *tdata = pdata->core_data[indx]; - - /* Remove the sysfs attributes */ - sysfs_remove_group(&pdata->hwmon_dev->kobj, &tdata->attr_group); - - kfree(pdata->core_data[indx]); - pdata->core_data[indx] = NULL; -} - static int coretemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;