Message ID | 20171102185122.GA6817@embeddedor.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 02/11/17 19:51, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment > on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Juergen
On 11/03/2017 04:04 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/11/17 19:51, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >> where we are expecting to fall through. >> >> Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment >> on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Applied to for-linus-4.15. -boris
diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c index 0c1ec68..ed94ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c @@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */ + /* fall through */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)