| Message ID | 20171201061311.16691-5-vigneshr@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:43:11AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: > Legacy INTD IRQ handling is broken on dra7xx due to fact that driver > uses hwirq in range of 1-4 for INTA, INTD whereas IRQ domain is of size > 4 which is numbered 0-3. Therefore when INTD IRQ line is used with > pci-dra7xx driver following warning is seen: > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:342 irq_domain_associate+0x12c/0x1c4 > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > Fix this by using pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to translate the INTx 1-4 > range into the 0-3 as done in other PCIe drivers. > > Also, iterate over all the INTx bits and call their respective IRQ > handlers before clearing the status register. It seems to me that you are fixing two bugs with one patch and therefore I would ask you to split it in two or explain to me why we should consider lumping them together. Thanks, Lorenzo > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Reported-by: Chris Welch <Chris.Welch@viavisolutions.com> > Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> > --- > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > index 53f721d1cc40..59e8de34cec6 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, > > static const struct irq_domain_ops intx_domain_ops = { > .map = dra7xx_pcie_intx_map, > + .xlate = pci_irqd_intx_xlate, > }; > > static int dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct pcie_port *pp) > @@ -256,7 +257,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) > struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = arg; > struct dw_pcie *pci = dra7xx->pci; > struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; > - u32 reg; > + unsigned long reg; > + u32 virq, bit; > > reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_IRQSTATUS_MSI); > > @@ -268,8 +270,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) > case INTB: > case INTC: > case INTD: > - generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(dra7xx->irq_domain, > - ffs(reg))); > + for_each_set_bit(bit, ®, PCI_NUM_INTX) { > + virq = irq_find_mapping(dra7xx->irq_domain, bit); > + if (virq) > + generic_handle_irq(virq); > + } > break; > } > > -- > 2.15.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Saturday 09 December 2017 12:05 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:43:11AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: >> Legacy INTD IRQ handling is broken on dra7xx due to fact that driver >> uses hwirq in range of 1-4 for INTA, INTD whereas IRQ domain is of size >> 4 which is numbered 0-3. Therefore when INTD IRQ line is used with >> pci-dra7xx driver following warning is seen: >> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:342 irq_domain_associate+0x12c/0x1c4 >> error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy >> >> Fix this by using pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to translate the INTx 1-4 >> range into the 0-3 as done in other PCIe drivers. >> >> Also, iterate over all the INTx bits and call their respective IRQ >> handlers before clearing the status register. > > It seems to me that you are fixing two bugs with one patch and therefore > I would ask you to split it in two or explain to me why we should > consider lumping them together. > Ok, I will split the patch into two in v2.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c index 53f721d1cc40..59e8de34cec6 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, static const struct irq_domain_ops intx_domain_ops = { .map = dra7xx_pcie_intx_map, + .xlate = pci_irqd_intx_xlate, }; static int dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct pcie_port *pp) @@ -256,7 +257,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = arg; struct dw_pcie *pci = dra7xx->pci; struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; - u32 reg; + unsigned long reg; + u32 virq, bit; reg = dra7xx_pcie_readl(dra7xx, PCIECTRL_DRA7XX_CONF_IRQSTATUS_MSI); @@ -268,8 +270,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) case INTB: case INTC: case INTD: - generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(dra7xx->irq_domain, - ffs(reg))); + for_each_set_bit(bit, ®, PCI_NUM_INTX) { + virq = irq_find_mapping(dra7xx->irq_domain, bit); + if (virq) + generic_handle_irq(virq); + } break; }
Legacy INTD IRQ handling is broken on dra7xx due to fact that driver uses hwirq in range of 1-4 for INTA, INTD whereas IRQ domain is of size 4 which is numbered 0-3. Therefore when INTD IRQ line is used with pci-dra7xx driver following warning is seen: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:342 irq_domain_associate+0x12c/0x1c4 error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy Fix this by using pci_irqd_intx_xlate() helper to translate the INTx 1-4 range into the 0-3 as done in other PCIe drivers. Also, iterate over all the INTx bits and call their respective IRQ handlers before clearing the status register. Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reported-by: Chris Welch <Chris.Welch@viavisolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com> --- drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)