diff mbox

[2/2] platform/x86: wmi: Allow creating WMI devices with the same GUID

Message ID 1512786861-1014-3-git-send-email-mario.limonciello@dell.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: Darren Hart
Headers show

Commit Message

Limonciello, Mario Dec. 9, 2017, 2:34 a.m. UTC
In: commit d1f9e4970742 ("ACPI: WMI: Survive BIOS with duplicate GUIDs")
parsing two of the same GUID was prevented in the WMI bus driver.

At the time no one understood why GUID 05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910
was being duplicated.  It's now known that GUID is used for the binary
MOF file of a _WDG entry in the ASL.  It's entirely possible for multiple
_WDG entries and for multiple instances to bind in a given driver.

NOTE:
The only known instance of duplicated GUID's is the WMI BMOF GUID above,
but it is possible that other vendors may duplicate GUIDs as well. It
would be better for drivers to not interact with the WMI bus by GUID
string but by the struct wmi_device provided by the WMI bus during
probing.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 31 -------------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-)

Comments

Andy Lutomirski Dec. 9, 2017, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@dell.com> wrote:
> In: commit d1f9e4970742 ("ACPI: WMI: Survive BIOS with duplicate GUIDs")
> parsing two of the same GUID was prevented in the WMI bus driver.
>
> At the time no one understood why GUID 05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910
> was being duplicated.  It's now known that GUID is used for the binary
> MOF file of a _WDG entry in the ASL.  It's entirely possible for multiple
> _WDG entries and for multiple instances to bind in a given driver.
>
> NOTE:
> The only known instance of duplicated GUID's is the WMI BMOF GUID above,
> but it is possible that other vendors may duplicate GUIDs as well. It
> would be better for drivers to not interact with the WMI bus by GUID
> string but by the struct wmi_device provided by the WMI bus during
> probing.

I think you also need to audit all the users of wmi_block_list for
duplicate handling.  For example, wmi_install_notify_handler()
probably needs a break statement inside the if (memcmp(...)).

>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 31 -------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index 45d9010aafcf..5ac17e360fa2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -1102,28 +1102,6 @@ static void wmi_free_devices(struct acpi_device *device)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static bool guid_already_parsed(struct acpi_device *device,
> -                               const u8 *guid)
> -{
> -       struct wmi_block *wblock;
> -
> -       list_for_each_entry(wblock, &wmi_block_list, list) {
> -               if (memcmp(wblock->gblock.guid, guid, 16) == 0) {
> -                       /*
> -                        * Because we historically didn't track the relationship
> -                        * between GUIDs and ACPI nodes, we don't know whether
> -                        * we need to suppress GUIDs that are unique on a
> -                        * given node but duplicated across nodes.
> -                        */
> -                       dev_warn(&device->dev, "duplicate WMI GUID %pUL (first instance was on %s)\n",
> -                                guid, dev_name(&wblock->acpi_device->dev));
> -                       return true;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Parse the _WDG method for the GUID data blocks
>   */
> @@ -1157,15 +1135,6 @@ static int parse_wdg(struct device *wmi_bus_dev, struct acpi_device *device)
>                 if (debug_dump_wdg)
>                         wmi_dump_wdg(&gblock[i]);
>
> -               /*
> -                * Some WMI devices, like those for nVidia hooks, have a
> -                * duplicate GUID. It's not clear what we should do in this
> -                * case yet, so for now, we'll just ignore the duplicate
> -                * for device creation.
> -                */
> -               if (guid_already_parsed(device, gblock[i].guid))
> -                       continue;
> -
>                 wblock = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wmi_block), GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (!wblock) {
>                         retval = -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.14.1
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
index 45d9010aafcf..5ac17e360fa2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -1102,28 +1102,6 @@  static void wmi_free_devices(struct acpi_device *device)
 	}
 }
 
-static bool guid_already_parsed(struct acpi_device *device,
-				const u8 *guid)
-{
-	struct wmi_block *wblock;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(wblock, &wmi_block_list, list) {
-		if (memcmp(wblock->gblock.guid, guid, 16) == 0) {
-			/*
-			 * Because we historically didn't track the relationship
-			 * between GUIDs and ACPI nodes, we don't know whether
-			 * we need to suppress GUIDs that are unique on a
-			 * given node but duplicated across nodes.
-			 */
-			dev_warn(&device->dev, "duplicate WMI GUID %pUL (first instance was on %s)\n",
-				 guid, dev_name(&wblock->acpi_device->dev));
-			return true;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 /*
  * Parse the _WDG method for the GUID data blocks
  */
@@ -1157,15 +1135,6 @@  static int parse_wdg(struct device *wmi_bus_dev, struct acpi_device *device)
 		if (debug_dump_wdg)
 			wmi_dump_wdg(&gblock[i]);
 
-		/*
-		 * Some WMI devices, like those for nVidia hooks, have a
-		 * duplicate GUID. It's not clear what we should do in this
-		 * case yet, so for now, we'll just ignore the duplicate
-		 * for device creation.
-		 */
-		if (guid_already_parsed(device, gblock[i].guid))
-			continue;
-
 		wblock = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wmi_block), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!wblock) {
 			retval = -ENOMEM;