Message ID | 20180110180428.22587-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Use prepare_to_wait() and finish_wait() instead of open-coding these > functions. Reduce the number of if-statements to make > blk_mq_mark_tag_wait() easier to read. Both add_wait_queue() and > blk_mq_dispatch_wake() protect wait queue manipulations with the wait > queue lock. Hence also protect the !list_empty(&wait->entry) test with > the wait queue lock instead of the hctx lock. > > Note: a side effect of this patch is that the task state is changed > for shared queues before and after the blk_mq_get_driver_tag(). > Since blk_mq_dispatch_wake() ignores the task state these task state > changes do not affect which task gets woken up. I'm not a fan of this. The reason it's open-coded is exactly because we don't want to mess around with the task state. > See also commit f906a6a0f426 ("blk-mq: improve tag waiting setup for > non-shared tags"). > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> > Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> > --- > block/blk-mq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 61bdbf45c3be..29f140b4dbf7 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -1121,50 +1121,35 @@ static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx, > if (!shared_tags) { > if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART, &this_hctx->state)) > set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART, &this_hctx->state); > + ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); > + /* > + * Don't clear RESTART here, someone else could have set it. > + * At most this will cost an extra queue run. > + */ > } else { > wait = &this_hctx->dispatch_wait; > if (!list_empty_careful(&wait->entry)) > return false; > > - spin_lock(&this_hctx->lock); > - if (!list_empty(&wait->entry)) { > - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); > - return false; > - } > - > ws = bt_wait_ptr(&this_hctx->tags->bitmap_tags, this_hctx); > - add_wait_queue(&ws->wait, wait); > - } > - > - /* > - * It's possible that a tag was freed in the window between the > - * allocation failure and adding the hardware queue to the wait > - * queue. > - */ > - ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); > + prepare_to_wait(&ws->wait, wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); > > - if (!shared_tags) { > /* > - * Don't clear RESTART here, someone else could have set it. > - * At most this will cost an extra queue run. > + * It's possible that a tag was freed in the window between the > + * allocation failure and adding the hardware queue to the wait > + * queue. > */ > - return ret; > - } else { > - if (!ret) { > - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); > - return false; > - } > - > + ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); > /* > - * We got a tag, remove ourselves from the wait queue to ensure > - * someone else gets the wakeup. > + * If we got a tag, remove ourselves from the wait queue to > + * ensure someone else gets the wakeup. > */ > - spin_lock_irq(&ws->wait.lock); > - list_del_init(&wait->entry); > - spin_unlock_irq(&ws->wait.lock); > - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); > - return true; > + if (ret) > + finish_wait(&ws->wait, wait); > + else > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > } > + return ret; > } > > bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list, > -- > 2.15.1 >
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 61bdbf45c3be..29f140b4dbf7 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -1121,50 +1121,35 @@ static bool blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx, if (!shared_tags) { if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART, &this_hctx->state)) set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART, &this_hctx->state); + ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); + /* + * Don't clear RESTART here, someone else could have set it. + * At most this will cost an extra queue run. + */ } else { wait = &this_hctx->dispatch_wait; if (!list_empty_careful(&wait->entry)) return false; - spin_lock(&this_hctx->lock); - if (!list_empty(&wait->entry)) { - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); - return false; - } - ws = bt_wait_ptr(&this_hctx->tags->bitmap_tags, this_hctx); - add_wait_queue(&ws->wait, wait); - } - - /* - * It's possible that a tag was freed in the window between the - * allocation failure and adding the hardware queue to the wait - * queue. - */ - ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); + prepare_to_wait(&ws->wait, wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); - if (!shared_tags) { /* - * Don't clear RESTART here, someone else could have set it. - * At most this will cost an extra queue run. + * It's possible that a tag was freed in the window between the + * allocation failure and adding the hardware queue to the wait + * queue. */ - return ret; - } else { - if (!ret) { - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); - return false; - } - + ret = blk_mq_get_driver_tag(rq, hctx, false); /* - * We got a tag, remove ourselves from the wait queue to ensure - * someone else gets the wakeup. + * If we got a tag, remove ourselves from the wait queue to + * ensure someone else gets the wakeup. */ - spin_lock_irq(&ws->wait.lock); - list_del_init(&wait->entry); - spin_unlock_irq(&ws->wait.lock); - spin_unlock(&this_hctx->lock); - return true; + if (ret) + finish_wait(&ws->wait, wait); + else + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); } + return ret; } bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
Use prepare_to_wait() and finish_wait() instead of open-coding these functions. Reduce the number of if-statements to make blk_mq_mark_tag_wait() easier to read. Both add_wait_queue() and blk_mq_dispatch_wake() protect wait queue manipulations with the wait queue lock. Hence also protect the !list_empty(&wait->entry) test with the wait queue lock instead of the hctx lock. Note: a side effect of this patch is that the task state is changed for shared queues before and after the blk_mq_get_driver_tag(). Since blk_mq_dispatch_wake() ignores the task state these task state changes do not affect which task gets woken up. See also commit f906a6a0f426 ("blk-mq: improve tag waiting setup for non-shared tags"). Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> --- block/blk-mq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)