diff mbox

[v2] media: s3c-camif: fix out-of-bounds array access

Message ID 20180116153105.3523235-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Jan. 16, 2018, 3:30 p.m. UTC
While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:

drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function '__camif_subdev_try_format':
drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array subscript is below array bounds

This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.

As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
back on the first format value for any unexpected input.

I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
of the function there.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series camera interface")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: rework logic rather than removing it.
---
 drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Sakari Ailus Jan. 16, 2018, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Arnd,

Thanks for the patch. Please see my comments below.

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:30:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
> into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:
> 
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function '__camif_subdev_try_format':
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array subscript is below array bounds
> 
> This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
> array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
> cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.
> 
> As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
> value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
> easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
> back on the first format value for any unexpected input.
> 
> I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
> of the function there.
> 
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
> Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series camera interface")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> v2: rework logic rather than removing it.
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> index 437395a61065..002609be1400 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> @@ -1256,15 +1256,18 @@ static void __camif_subdev_try_format(struct camif_dev *camif,
>  {
>  	const struct s3c_camif_variant *variant = camif->variant;
>  	const struct vp_pix_limits *pix_lim;
> -	int i = ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats);
> +	int i;
>  
>  	/* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
>  	pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
>  
> -	while (i-- >= 0)
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)

Yeah, that loop was odd...

>  		if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
>  			break;
>  
> +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
> +		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
> +

Either else here so that the line below is executed only if the condition
is false, or assign i = 0 above. Otherwise you'll end up with a different
off-by-one bug. :-)

i could be unsigned int, too. It'd be nicer that way actually.

>  	mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
Arnd Bergmann Jan. 16, 2018, 4:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>>               if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
>>                       break;
>>
>> +     if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
>> +             mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
>> +
>
> Either else here so that the line below is executed only if the condition
> is false, or assign i = 0 above. Otherwise you'll end up with a different
> off-by-one bug. :-)

Oops. Sent v3 now, thanks for the review.

      Arnd
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
index 437395a61065..002609be1400 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
@@ -1256,15 +1256,18 @@  static void __camif_subdev_try_format(struct camif_dev *camif,
 {
 	const struct s3c_camif_variant *variant = camif->variant;
 	const struct vp_pix_limits *pix_lim;
-	int i = ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats);
+	int i;
 
 	/* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
 	pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
 
-	while (i-- >= 0)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
 		if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
 			break;
 
+	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
+		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
+
 	mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
 
 	if (pad == CAMIF_SD_PAD_SINK) {