Message ID | f5426a36d6a0d997d5f6445201861445d8e857da.1516300623.git.alistair.francis@xilinx.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 01/18/2018 03:38 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com> > Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com> > --- > V4: > - Move the IPI to the machine instead of the SoC > > hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c > index 7312bfe23e..999a5657cf 100644 > --- a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c > +++ b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include "cpu.h" > #include "boot.h" > > +#include "hw/intc/xlnx-zynqmp-ipi.h" > #include "hw/intc/xlnx-pmu-iomod-intc.h" > > /* Define the PMU device */ > @@ -38,6 +39,15 @@ > > #define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_INTC_ADDR 0xFFD40000 > > +#define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS 4 > + > +static const uint64_t ipi_addr[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { > + 0xFF340000, 0xFF350000, 0xFF360000, 0xFF370000, > +}; > +static const uint64_t ipi_irq[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { > + 19, 20, 21, 22, > +}; > + > typedef struct XlnxZynqMPPMUSoCState { > /*< private >*/ > DeviceState parent_obj; > @@ -136,6 +146,9 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) > MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory(); > MemoryRegion *pmu_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); > MemoryRegion *pmu_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); > + XlnxZynqMPIPI *ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; Why use pointers and g_new() here? Isn't a plain array simpler? XlnxZynqMPIPI ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; (same apply to pmu_rom/ram) Or maybe do you plan to start implementing MachineClass::exit()? (or go in this direction, which might make sens thinking about having a multiarch single binary). > + qemu_irq irq[32]; > + int i; > > /* Create the ROM */ > memory_region_init_rom(pmu_rom, NULL, "xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.rom", > @@ -155,6 +168,24 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) > &error_abort); > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pmu), true, "realized", &error_fatal); > > + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { > + irq[i] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&pmu->intc), i); > + } > + > + /* Create and connect the IPI device */ > + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { > + ipi[i] = g_new0(XlnxZynqMPIPI, 1); > + object_initialize(ipi[i], sizeof(XlnxZynqMPIPI), TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_IPI); > + qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(ipi[i]), sysbus_get_default()); > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { > + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(ipi[i]), true, "realized", > + &error_abort); > + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, ipi_addr[i]); > + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, irq[ipi_irq[i]]); > + } > + > /* Load the kernel */ > microblaze_load_kernel(&pmu->cpu, XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_RAM_ADDR, > machine->ram_size, >
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: > On 01/18/2018 03:38 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com> >> Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com> >> --- >> V4: >> - Move the IPI to the machine instead of the SoC >> >> hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >> index 7312bfe23e..999a5657cf 100644 >> --- a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >> +++ b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ >> #include "cpu.h" >> #include "boot.h" >> >> +#include "hw/intc/xlnx-zynqmp-ipi.h" >> #include "hw/intc/xlnx-pmu-iomod-intc.h" >> >> /* Define the PMU device */ >> @@ -38,6 +39,15 @@ >> >> #define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_INTC_ADDR 0xFFD40000 >> >> +#define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS 4 >> + >> +static const uint64_t ipi_addr[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { >> + 0xFF340000, 0xFF350000, 0xFF360000, 0xFF370000, >> +}; >> +static const uint64_t ipi_irq[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { >> + 19, 20, 21, 22, >> +}; >> + >> typedef struct XlnxZynqMPPMUSoCState { >> /*< private >*/ >> DeviceState parent_obj; >> @@ -136,6 +146,9 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) >> MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory(); >> MemoryRegion *pmu_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >> MemoryRegion *pmu_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >> + XlnxZynqMPIPI *ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; > > Why use pointers and g_new() here? > > Isn't a plain array simpler? I remember that I tried that and ran into issues. It was so long ago though that I can't remember what the problem was. I think it was related to adding the object as a child. Alistair > > XlnxZynqMPIPI ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; > > (same apply to pmu_rom/ram) > > Or maybe do you plan to start implementing MachineClass::exit()? > > (or go in this direction, which might make sens thinking about having a > multiarch single binary). > >> + qemu_irq irq[32]; >> + int i; >> >> /* Create the ROM */ >> memory_region_init_rom(pmu_rom, NULL, "xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.rom", >> @@ -155,6 +168,24 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) >> &error_abort); >> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pmu), true, "realized", &error_fatal); >> >> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { >> + irq[i] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&pmu->intc), i); >> + } >> + >> + /* Create and connect the IPI device */ >> + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { >> + ipi[i] = g_new0(XlnxZynqMPIPI, 1); >> + object_initialize(ipi[i], sizeof(XlnxZynqMPIPI), TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_IPI); >> + qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(ipi[i]), sysbus_get_default()); >> + } >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { >> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(ipi[i]), true, "realized", >> + &error_abort); >> + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, ipi_addr[i]); >> + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, irq[ipi_irq[i]]); >> + } >> + >> /* Load the kernel */ >> microblaze_load_kernel(&pmu->cpu, XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_RAM_ADDR, >> machine->ram_size, >>
On 01/19/2018 03:15 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 03:38 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com> >>> --- >>> V4: >>> - Move the IPI to the machine instead of the SoC >>> >>> hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >>> index 7312bfe23e..999a5657cf 100644 >>> --- a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >>> +++ b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c >>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ >>> #include "cpu.h" >>> #include "boot.h" >>> >>> +#include "hw/intc/xlnx-zynqmp-ipi.h" >>> #include "hw/intc/xlnx-pmu-iomod-intc.h" >>> >>> /* Define the PMU device */ >>> @@ -38,6 +39,15 @@ >>> >>> #define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_INTC_ADDR 0xFFD40000 >>> >>> +#define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS 4 >>> + >>> +static const uint64_t ipi_addr[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { >>> + 0xFF340000, 0xFF350000, 0xFF360000, 0xFF370000, >>> +}; >>> +static const uint64_t ipi_irq[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { >>> + 19, 20, 21, 22, >>> +}; >>> + >>> typedef struct XlnxZynqMPPMUSoCState { >>> /*< private >*/ >>> DeviceState parent_obj; >>> @@ -136,6 +146,9 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) >>> MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory(); >>> MemoryRegion *pmu_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >>> MemoryRegion *pmu_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >>> + XlnxZynqMPIPI *ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; >> >> Why use pointers and g_new() here? >> >> Isn't a plain array simpler? > > I remember that I tried that and ran into issues. It was so long ago > though that I can't remember what the problem was. I think it was > related to adding the object as a child. It makes sens for the SoC container where it is indeed necessary, but your v4 moved this into the machine. Not a blocking issue although. > > Alistair > >> >> XlnxZynqMPIPI ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; >> >> (same apply to pmu_rom/ram) >> >> Or maybe do you plan to start implementing MachineClass::exit()? >> >> (or go in this direction, which might make sens thinking about having a >> multiarch single binary). >> >>> + qemu_irq irq[32]; >>> + int i; >>> >>> /* Create the ROM */ >>> memory_region_init_rom(pmu_rom, NULL, "xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.rom", >>> @@ -155,6 +168,24 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) >>> &error_abort); >>> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pmu), true, "realized", &error_fatal); >>> >>> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { >>> + irq[i] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&pmu->intc), i); >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* Create and connect the IPI device */ >>> + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { >>> + ipi[i] = g_new0(XlnxZynqMPIPI, 1); >>> + object_initialize(ipi[i], sizeof(XlnxZynqMPIPI), TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_IPI); >>> + qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(ipi[i]), sysbus_get_default()); >>> + } >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { >>> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(ipi[i]), true, "realized", >>> + &error_abort); >>> + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, ipi_addr[i]); >>> + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, irq[ipi_irq[i]]); >>> + } >>> + >>> /* Load the kernel */ >>> microblaze_load_kernel(&pmu->cpu, XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_RAM_ADDR, >>> machine->ram_size, >>> >
diff --git a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c index 7312bfe23e..999a5657cf 100644 --- a/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c +++ b/hw/microblaze/xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include "cpu.h" #include "boot.h" +#include "hw/intc/xlnx-zynqmp-ipi.h" #include "hw/intc/xlnx-pmu-iomod-intc.h" /* Define the PMU device */ @@ -38,6 +39,15 @@ #define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_INTC_ADDR 0xFFD40000 +#define XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS 4 + +static const uint64_t ipi_addr[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { + 0xFF340000, 0xFF350000, 0xFF360000, 0xFF370000, +}; +static const uint64_t ipi_irq[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS] = { + 19, 20, 21, 22, +}; + typedef struct XlnxZynqMPPMUSoCState { /*< private >*/ DeviceState parent_obj; @@ -136,6 +146,9 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory(); MemoryRegion *pmu_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); MemoryRegion *pmu_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); + XlnxZynqMPIPI *ipi[XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS]; + qemu_irq irq[32]; + int i; /* Create the ROM */ memory_region_init_rom(pmu_rom, NULL, "xlnx-zynqmp-pmu.rom", @@ -155,6 +168,24 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_pmu_init(MachineState *machine) &error_abort); object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(pmu), true, "realized", &error_fatal); + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { + irq[i] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(&pmu->intc), i); + } + + /* Create and connect the IPI device */ + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { + ipi[i] = g_new0(XlnxZynqMPIPI, 1); + object_initialize(ipi[i], sizeof(XlnxZynqMPIPI), TYPE_XLNX_ZYNQMP_IPI); + qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(ipi[i]), sysbus_get_default()); + } + + for (i = 0; i < XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_NUM_IPIS; i++) { + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(ipi[i]), true, "realized", + &error_abort); + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, ipi_addr[i]); + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ipi[i]), 0, irq[ipi_irq[i]]); + } + /* Load the kernel */ microblaze_load_kernel(&pmu->cpu, XLNX_ZYNQMP_PMU_RAM_ADDR, machine->ram_size,