diff mbox

clk: Properly update prepare/enable count on orphan clock reparent

Message ID 20180115115214.10303-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Marek Szyprowski Jan. 15, 2018, 11:52 a.m. UTC
If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if it or
one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the prepare/enable
counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated correctly. This
might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.

This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811 clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
[<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
[<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
[<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
[<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24)
[<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)
[<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
[<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
[<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
[<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
[<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
[<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
[<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
[<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
[<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
[<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17a ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684 clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
[<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
[<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
[<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
[<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)
[<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
[<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
[<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
[<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
[<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
[<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
[<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
[<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
[<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
[<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17b ]---
------------[ cut here ]------------

Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting during registration")
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Jan. 17, 2018, 8:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if it or
> one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the prepare/enable
> counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated correctly. This
> might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.
>

Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Stephen Boyd Jan. 25, 2018, 10:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On 01/15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if it or
> one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the prepare/enable
> counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated correctly. This
> might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.
> 
> This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811 clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
> [<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
> [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
> [<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24)
> [<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)
> [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
> [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
> [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
> [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
> Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> ---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17a ]---
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684 clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
> [<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> [<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
> [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
> [<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)
> [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
> [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
> [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
> [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
> Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> ---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17b ]---
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> 
> Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting during registration")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
>  		if (parent) {
>  			/* update the clk tree topology */
>  			flags = clk_enable_lock();

This is the spinlock?

> +			if (orphan->prepare_count)
> +				clk_core_prepare(parent);

And this is prepare mutex? Doesn't sound like it will work.

> +			if (orphan->enable_count)
> +				clk_core_enable(parent);

This would be OK, but then we might touch the hardware again?
Marek Szyprowski Jan. 26, 2018, 7:31 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Stephen,

On 2018-01-25 23:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if it or
>> one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the prepare/enable
>> counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated correctly. This
>> might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.
>>
>> This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811 clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
>> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
>> [<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
>> [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
>> [<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24)
>> [<c048d584>] (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)
>> [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
>> [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
>> [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
>> [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
>> Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
>> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
>> ---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17a ]---
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684 clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115 #106
>> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn
>> [<c0111504>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<c010dbec>] (show_stack) from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8)
>> [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack) from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110)
>> [<c0125060>] (__warn) from [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48)
>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)
>> [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c)
>> [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc)
>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc)
>> [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc)
>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread) from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164)
>> [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20)
>> Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to 0xeeb01ff8)
>> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
>> ---[ end trace 503c239fb760f17b ]---
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>
>> Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting during registration")
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
>>   		if (parent) {
>>   			/* update the clk tree topology */
>>   			flags = clk_enable_lock();
> This is the spinlock?

yes

>
>> +			if (orphan->prepare_count)
>> +				clk_core_prepare(parent);
> And this is prepare mutex? Doesn't sound like it will work.

Prepare mutex is taken at the beginning of __clk_core_init() function, so
everything is fine here.

>> +			if (orphan->enable_count)
>> +				clk_core_enable(parent);
> This would be OK, but then we might touch the hardware again?

Well, it will touch hardware in one case: if orphaned clock is already
prepared and enabled (for example due to having CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag)
and the newly registered parent is not (yet?) enabled. Then it will
prepare and enable this new parent clock, what is a desired behavior.

This code will not temporarily disable any clocks, what I assume was the
main reason for the patch mentioned in the commit message.

Best regards
Aisheng Dong Jan. 26, 2018, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #4
> -----Original Message-----

> From: Marek Szyprowski [mailto:m.szyprowski@samsung.com]

> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:31 PM

> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Michael

> Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>;

> A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>; Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

> <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Properly update prepare/enable count on orphan

> clock reparent

> 

> Hi Stephen,

> 

> On 2018-01-25 23:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> > On 01/15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> >> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if

> >> it or one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the

> >> prepare/enable counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated

> >> correctly. This might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.

> >>

> >> This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:

> >> ------------[ cut here ]------------

> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811

> >> clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24 Modules linked in:

> >> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115

> >> #106 Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)

> >> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]

> (unwind_backtrace)

> >> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)

> >> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)

> >> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from

> >> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]

> >> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>]

> >> (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24) [<c048d584>]

> >> (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>]

> >> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)

> >> [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]

> >> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)

> >> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]

> >> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)

> >> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]

> >> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from

> >> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]

> >> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)

> >> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]

> >> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)

> >> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]

> >> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from

> >> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)

> >> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from

> >> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to

> 0xeeb01ff8)

> >> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

> >> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

> >> 00000000

> >> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end

> >> trace 503c239fb760f17a ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------

> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684

> >> clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20

> >> Modules linked in:

> >> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7-next-

> 20180115 #106

> >> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)

> >> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]

> (unwind_backtrace)

> >> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)

> >> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)

> >> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from

> >> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]

> >> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>]

> >> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)

> >> [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]

> >> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)

> >> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]

> >> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)

> >> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]

> >> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from

> >> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]

> >> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)

> >> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]

> >> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)

> >> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]

> >> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from

> >> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)

> >> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from

> >> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to

> 0xeeb01ff8)

> >> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

> >> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

> >> 00000000

> >> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end

> >> trace 503c239fb760f17b ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------

> >>

> >> Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting

> >> during registration")

> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

> >> ---

> >>   drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++

> >>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

> >>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index

> >> 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644

> >> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c

> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c

> >> @@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)

> >>   		if (parent) {

> >>   			/* update the clk tree topology */

> >>   			flags = clk_enable_lock();

> > This is the spinlock?

> 

> yes

> 

> >

> >> +			if (orphan->prepare_count)

> >> +				clk_core_prepare(parent);

> > And this is prepare mutex? Doesn't sound like it will work.

> 

> Prepare mutex is taken at the beginning of __clk_core_init() function, so

> everything is fine here.

> 


Theoretically no issue may happen, just looks strange to claim mutex within
spinlock.

> >> +			if (orphan->enable_count)

> >> +				clk_core_enable(parent);

> > This would be OK, but then we might touch the hardware again?

> 

> Well, it will touch hardware in one case: if orphaned clock is already prepared

> and enabled (for example due to having CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag) and the newly

> registered parent is not (yet?) enabled. Then it will prepare and enable this

> new parent clock, what is a desired behavior.

> 

> This code will not temporarily disable any clocks, what I assume was the main

> reason for the patch mentioned in the commit message.

> 


Then this code seems bypass the CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE feature.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> Best regards

> --

> Marek Szyprowski, PhD

> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Marek Szyprowski Jan. 26, 2018, 9:06 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Aisheng,

On 2018-01-26 09:36, A.s. Dong wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marek Szyprowski [mailto:m.szyprowski@samsung.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:31 PM
>> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Michael
>> Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>;
>> A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>; Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Properly update prepare/enable count on orphan
>> clock reparent
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 2018-01-25 23:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 01/15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if
>>>> it or one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the
>>>> prepare/enable counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated
>>>> correctly. This might later cause warnings during changing clock parents.
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:
>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811
>>>> clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24 Modules linked in:
>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115
>>>> #106 Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]
>> (unwind_backtrace)
>>>> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)
>>>> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)
>>>> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from
>>>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]
>>>> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>]
>>>> (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24) [<c048d584>]
>>>> (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>]
>>>> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)
>>>> [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]
>>>> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>>>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]
>>>> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>>>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]
>>>> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from
>>>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]
>>>> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>>>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]
>>>> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>>>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]
>>>> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from
>>>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)
>>>> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from
>>>> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to
>> 0xeeb01ff8)
>>>> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>> 00000000
>>>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end
>>>> trace 503c239fb760f17a ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684
>>>> clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20
>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G        W        4.15.0-rc7-next-
>> 20180115 #106
>>>> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]
>> (unwind_backtrace)
>>>> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)
>>>> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)
>>>> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from
>>>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]
>>>> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>]
>>>> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)
>>>> [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]
>>>> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>>>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]
>>>> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>>>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]
>>>> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from
>>>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]
>>>> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>>>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]
>>>> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>>>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]
>>>> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from
>>>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)
>>>> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from
>>>> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to
>> 0xeeb01ff8)
>>>> 1fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>> 00000000
>>>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end
>>>> trace 503c239fb760f17b ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting
>>>> during registration")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index
>>>> 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>>>> @@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
>>>>    		if (parent) {
>>>>    			/* update the clk tree topology */
>>>>    			flags = clk_enable_lock();
>>> This is the spinlock?
>> yes
>>
>>>> +			if (orphan->prepare_count)
>>>> +				clk_core_prepare(parent);
>>> And this is prepare mutex? Doesn't sound like it will work.
>> Prepare mutex is taken at the beginning of __clk_core_init() function, so
>> everything is fine here.
>>
> Theoretically no issue may happen, just looks strange to claim mutex within
> spinlock.

Nope, the mutex is taken before entering this block of code. What is strange
then? clk_core_prepare() doesn't touch prepare mutex, there is also
a clk_core_prepare_lock() function, which takes it.

>>>> +			if (orphan->enable_count)
>>>> +				clk_core_enable(parent);
>>> This would be OK, but then we might touch the hardware again?
>> Well, it will touch hardware in one case: if orphaned clock is already prepared
>> and enabled (for example due to having CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag) and the newly
>> registered parent is not (yet?) enabled. Then it will prepare and enable this
>> new parent clock, what is a desired behavior.
>>
>> This code will not temporarily disable any clocks, what I assume was the main
>> reason for the patch mentioned in the commit message.
>>
> Then this code seems bypass the CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE feature.

Well, CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE doesn't affect preparing/enabling parent 
clock if
child clock has been already prepared/enabled. That's all that this fix 
do, so
I don't know what do you mean by bypassing the CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE 
feature.

Best regards
Marek Szyprowski Jan. 26, 2018, 9:14 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi Aisheng and Stephen,

On 2018-01-26 10:06, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Aisheng,
>
> On 2018-01-26 09:36, A.s. Dong wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Marek Szyprowski [mailto:m.szyprowski@samsung.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 3:31 PM
>>> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; 
>>> Michael
>>> Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>;
>>> A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>; Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>>> <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Properly update prepare/enable count on 
>>> orphan
>>> clock reparent
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> On 2018-01-25 23:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 01/15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>> If orphaned clock has been already prepared/enabled (for example if
>>>>> it or one of its children has CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag), then the
>>>>> prepare/enable counters of the newly assigned parent are not updated
>>>>> correctly. This might later cause warnings during changing clock 
>>>>> parents.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes following warning on Exynos5422-based boards:
>>>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:811
>>>>> clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24 Modules linked in:
>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-next-20180115
>>>>> #106 Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]
>>> (unwind_backtrace)
>>>>> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)
>>>>> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)
>>>>> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from
>>>>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]
>>>>> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048d584>]
>>>>> (clk_core_disable_lock+0x18/0x24) [<c048d584>]
>>>>> (clk_core_disable_lock) from [<c048e490>]
>>>>> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0xc/0x20)
>>>>> [<c048e490>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]
>>>>> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>>>>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]
>>>>> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>>>>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]
>>>>> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from
>>>>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]
>>>>> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>>>>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]
>>>>> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>>>>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]
>>>>> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from
>>>>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)
>>>>> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from
>>>>> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to
>>> 0xeeb01ff8)
>>>>> 1fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> 00000000
>>>>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end
>>>>> trace 503c239fb760f17a ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 59 at drivers/clk/clk.c:684
>>>>> clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20
>>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G W        4.15.0-rc7-next-
>>> 20180115 #106
>>>>> Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>>>>> Workqueue: pm genpd_power_off_work_fn [<c0111504>]
>>> (unwind_backtrace)
>>>>> from [<c010dbec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010dbec>] (show_stack)
>>>>> from [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc8) [<c09b3f34>] (dump_stack)
>>>>> from [<c0125060>] (__warn+0xe4/0x110) [<c0125060>] (__warn) from
>>>>> [<c01250cc>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [<c01250cc>]
>>>>> (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c048e49c>]
>>>>> (clk_core_disable_unprepare+0x18/0x20)
>>>>> [<c048e49c>] (clk_core_disable_unprepare) from [<c048ea60>]
>>>>> (__clk_set_parent_after+0x48/0x4c)
>>>>> [<c048ea60>] (__clk_set_parent_after) from [<c048ec88>]
>>>>> (clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x224/0x5b4)
>>>>> [<c048ec88>] (clk_core_set_parent_nolock) from [<c048f23c>]
>>>>> (clk_set_parent+0x38/0x6c) [<c048f23c>] (clk_set_parent) from
>>>>> [<c049c41c>] (exynos_pd_power+0x74/0x1cc) [<c049c41c>]
>>>>> (exynos_pd_power) from [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off+0x164/0x264)
>>>>> [<c0550768>] (genpd_power_off) from [<c0550b34>]
>>>>> (genpd_power_off_work_fn+0x2c/0x40)
>>>>> [<c0550b34>] (genpd_power_off_work_fn) from [<c01432e4>]
>>>>> (process_one_work+0x1d0/0x7bc) [<c01432e4>] (process_one_work) from
>>>>> [<c014393c>] (worker_thread+0x34/0x4dc) [<c014393c>] (worker_thread)
>>>>> from [<c014a0d0>] (kthread+0x128/0x164) [<c014a0d0>] (kthread) from
>>>>> [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) Exception stack(0xeeb01fb0 to
>>> 0xeeb01ff8)
>>>>> 1fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> 1fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>>>>> 00000000
>>>>> 1fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 ---[ end
>>>>> trace 503c239fb760f17b ]--- ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: f8f8f1d04494 ("clk: Don't touch hardware when reparenting
>>>>> during registration")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index
>>>>> 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>>>>> @@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core 
>>>>> *core)
>>>>>            if (parent) {
>>>>>                /* update the clk tree topology */
>>>>>                flags = clk_enable_lock();
>>>> This is the spinlock?
>>> yes
>>>
>>>>> +            if (orphan->prepare_count)
>>>>> +                clk_core_prepare(parent);
>>>> And this is prepare mutex? Doesn't sound like it will work.
>>> Prepare mutex is taken at the beginning of __clk_core_init() 
>>> function, so
>>> everything is fine here.
>>>
>> Theoretically no issue may happen, just looks strange to claim mutex 
>> within
>> spinlock.
>
> Nope, the mutex is taken before entering this block of code. What is 
> strange
> then? clk_core_prepare() doesn't touch prepare mutex, there is also
> a clk_core_prepare_lock() function, which takes it.

Okay, I got your concerns. To make this part a bit easier to understand, 
I will
move "if (orphan->prepare_count) clk_core_prepare(parent);" to be called 
before
"flags = clk_enable_lock();".

>>>>> +            if (orphan->enable_count)
>>>>> +                clk_core_enable(parent);
>>>> This would be OK, but then we might touch the hardware again?
>>> Well, it will touch hardware in one case: if orphaned clock is 
>>> already prepared
>>> and enabled (for example due to having CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag) and the 
>>> newly
>>> registered parent is not (yet?) enabled. Then it will prepare and 
>>> enable this
>>> new parent clock, what is a desired behavior.
>>>
>>> This code will not temporarily disable any clocks, what I assume was 
>>> the main
>>> reason for the patch mentioned in the commit message.
>>>
>> Then this code seems bypass the CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE feature.
>
> Well, CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE doesn't affect preparing/enabling parent 
> clock if
> child clock has been already prepared/enabled. That's all that this 
> fix do, so
> I don't know what do you mean by bypassing the CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE 
> feature.

Best regards
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 0f686a9dac3e..d33c087d7868 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2982,6 +2982,10 @@  static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
 		if (parent) {
 			/* update the clk tree topology */
 			flags = clk_enable_lock();
+			if (orphan->prepare_count)
+				clk_core_prepare(parent);
+			if (orphan->enable_count)
+				clk_core_enable(parent);
 			clk_reparent(orphan, parent);
 			clk_enable_unlock(flags);
 			__clk_recalc_accuracies(orphan);