Message ID | 1519567855-26105-4-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Stefan, > Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). > This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth > subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). > > In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ > > &uart0 { > pinctrl-names = "default"; > - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; > + status = "okay"; > + > + bluetooth { > + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > + max-speed = <2000000>; > + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > +}; is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? Or is this actually the device-wakeup GPIO? Regards Marcel
Hi Marcel, > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> hat am 25. Februar 2018 um 21:17 geschrieben: > > > Hi Stefan, > > > Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). > > This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth > > subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). > > > > In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > > index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > > @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ > > > > &uart0 { > > pinctrl-names = "default"; > > - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; > > + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; > > + status = "okay"; > > + > > + bluetooth { > > + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > > + max-speed = <2000000>; > > + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + }; > > +}; > > is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? Yes, unload and reload works fine. > Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? I assume that, because reload works as expected. > Or is this actually the device-wakeup GPIO? The line is called BT_ON, so i don't expect this to be the device-wakeup. I don't have any schematics for the bluetooth part. Regards Stefan > > Regards > > Marcel >
Hi Stefan, >>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). >>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth >>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). >>> >>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ >>> >>> &uart0 { >>> pinctrl-names = "default"; >>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; >>> + status = "okay"; >>> + >>> + bluetooth { >>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; >>> + max-speed = <2000000>; >>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>> + }; >>> +}; >> >> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? > > Yes, unload and reload works fine. > >> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? > > I assume that, because reload works as expected. awesome. That is good news. Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. Regards Marcel
Hi Marcel, > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> hat am 25. Februar 2018 um 22:38 geschrieben: > > > Hi Stefan, > > >>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). > >>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth > >>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). > >>> > >>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ > >>> > >>> &uart0 { > >>> pinctrl-names = "default"; > >>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; > >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; > >>> + status = "okay"; > >>> + > >>> + bluetooth { > >>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > >>> + max-speed = <2000000>; > >>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >>> + }; > >>> +}; > >> > >> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? > > > > Yes, unload and reload works fine. > > > >> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? > > > > I assume that, because reload works as expected. > > awesome. That is good news. > > Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? Currently not > If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. Sure, but not before this weekend. > > Regards > > Marcel > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Marcel, > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> hat am 25. Februar 2018 um 22:38 geschrieben: > > > Hi Stefan, > > >>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). > >>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth > >>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). > >>> > >>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ > >>> > >>> &uart0 { > >>> pinctrl-names = "default"; > >>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; > >>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; > >>> + status = "okay"; > >>> + > >>> + bluetooth { > >>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > >>> + max-speed = <2000000>; > >>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >>> + }; > >>> +}; > >> > >> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? > > > > Yes, unload and reload works fine. > > > >> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? > > > > I assume that, because reload works as expected. > > awesome. That is good news. > > Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. so here comes the bad news. hci_bcm uses gpiod_set_value() which is for interrupt context, but the gpio expander can sleep. So we will get this warning: [ 4.802447] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 4.802485] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 91 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2986 gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58 [ 4.802489] Modules linked in: hci_uart ac97_bus btbcm snd_pcm_dmaengine bluetooth snd_pcm snd_timer ecdh_generic snd soundcore bcm2835_thermal crc32_arm_ce [ 4.802543] CPU: 3 PID: 91 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc3-next-20180302-dirty #4 [ 4.802547] Hardware name: BCM2835 [ 4.802562] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 4.802593] [<c03119a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030cc24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 4.802612] [<c030cc24>] (show_stack) from [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xa0) [ 4.802628] [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0343a2c>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) [ 4.802640] [<c0343a2c>] (__warn) from [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) [ 4.802652] [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58) [ 4.802693] [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value) from [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown+0xc/0x14 [hci_uart]) [ 4.802757] [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power+0x18/0x140 [hci_uart]) [ 4.802806] [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe+0x64/0x9c [hci_uart]) [ 4.802848] [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe [hci_uart]) from [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device+0x254/0x32c) [ 4.802863] [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8) [ 4.802878] [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xb4) [ 4.802895] [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn+0x44/0x108) [ 4.802910] [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn) from [<c035d594>] (process_one_work+0x200/0x4f8) [ 4.802923] [<c035d594>] (process_one_work) from [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x5d4) [ 4.802938] [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread) from [<c0363300>] (kthread+0x150/0x158) [ 4.802952] [<c0363300>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) [ 4.802957] Exception stack(0xed959fb0 to 0xed959ff8) [ 4.802966] 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 4.802977] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 4.802986] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 [ 4.802993] ---[ end trace b947f9d4c40fa261 ]--- Stefan > > Regards > > Marcel > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Stefan, >>>>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). >>>>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth >>>>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). >>>>> >>>>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ >>>>> >>>>> &uart0 { >>>>> pinctrl-names = "default"; >>>>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; >>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; >>>>> + status = "okay"; >>>>> + >>>>> + bluetooth { >>>>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; >>>>> + max-speed = <2000000>; >>>>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> + }; >>>>> +}; >>>> >>>> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? >>> >>> Yes, unload and reload works fine. >>> >>>> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? >>> >>> I assume that, because reload works as expected. >> >> awesome. That is good news. >> >> Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. > > so here comes the bad news. hci_bcm uses gpiod_set_value() which is for interrupt context, but the gpio expander can sleep. So we will get this warning: > > [ 4.802447] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 4.802485] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 91 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2986 gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58 > [ 4.802489] Modules linked in: hci_uart ac97_bus btbcm snd_pcm_dmaengine bluetooth snd_pcm snd_timer ecdh_generic snd soundcore bcm2835_thermal crc32_arm_ce > [ 4.802543] CPU: 3 PID: 91 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc3-next-20180302-dirty #4 > [ 4.802547] Hardware name: BCM2835 > [ 4.802562] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn > [ 4.802593] [<c03119a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030cc24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [ 4.802612] [<c030cc24>] (show_stack) from [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xa0) > [ 4.802628] [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0343a2c>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) > [ 4.802640] [<c0343a2c>] (__warn) from [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) > [ 4.802652] [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58) > [ 4.802693] [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value) from [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown+0xc/0x14 [hci_uart]) > [ 4.802757] [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power+0x18/0x140 [hci_uart]) > [ 4.802806] [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe+0x64/0x9c [hci_uart]) > [ 4.802848] [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe [hci_uart]) from [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device+0x254/0x32c) > [ 4.802863] [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8) > [ 4.802878] [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xb4) > [ 4.802895] [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn+0x44/0x108) > [ 4.802910] [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn) from [<c035d594>] (process_one_work+0x200/0x4f8) > [ 4.802923] [<c035d594>] (process_one_work) from [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x5d4) > [ 4.802938] [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread) from [<c0363300>] (kthread+0x150/0x158) > [ 4.802952] [<c0363300>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) > [ 4.802957] Exception stack(0xed959fb0 to 0xed959ff8) > [ 4.802966] 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > [ 4.802977] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > [ 4.802986] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 > [ 4.802993] ---[ end trace b947f9d4c40fa261 ]— that is weird since we should be either in a probe context or in hdev->open context and both can sleep as far as I know. Regards Marcel
Hi Marcel, > Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> hat am 5. März 2018 um 06:19 geschrieben: > > > Hi Stefan, > > >>>>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). > >>>>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth > >>>>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). > >>>>> > >>>>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- > >>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>>>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 > >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts > >>>>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ > >>>>> > >>>>> &uart0 { > >>>>> pinctrl-names = "default"; > >>>>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; > >>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; > >>>>> + status = "okay"; > >>>>> + > >>>>> + bluetooth { > >>>>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; > >>>>> + max-speed = <2000000>; > >>>>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > >>>>> + }; > >>>>> +}; > >>>> > >>>> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? > >>> > >>> Yes, unload and reload works fine. > >>> > >>>> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? > >>> > >>> I assume that, because reload works as expected. > >> > >> awesome. That is good news. > >> > >> Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. > > > > so here comes the bad news. hci_bcm uses gpiod_set_value() which is for interrupt context, but the gpio expander can sleep. So we will get this warning: > > > > [ 4.802447] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 4.802485] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 91 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2986 gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58 > > [ 4.802489] Modules linked in: hci_uart ac97_bus btbcm snd_pcm_dmaengine bluetooth snd_pcm snd_timer ecdh_generic snd soundcore bcm2835_thermal crc32_arm_ce > > [ 4.802543] CPU: 3 PID: 91 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc3-next-20180302-dirty #4 > > [ 4.802547] Hardware name: BCM2835 > > [ 4.802562] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn > > [ 4.802593] [<c03119a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030cc24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > > [ 4.802612] [<c030cc24>] (show_stack) from [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xa0) > > [ 4.802628] [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0343a2c>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) > > [ 4.802640] [<c0343a2c>] (__warn) from [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) > > [ 4.802652] [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58) > > [ 4.802693] [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value) from [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown+0xc/0x14 [hci_uart]) > > [ 4.802757] [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power+0x18/0x140 [hci_uart]) > > [ 4.802806] [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe+0x64/0x9c [hci_uart]) > > [ 4.802848] [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe [hci_uart]) from [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device+0x254/0x32c) > > [ 4.802863] [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8) > > [ 4.802878] [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xb4) > > [ 4.802895] [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn+0x44/0x108) > > [ 4.802910] [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn) from [<c035d594>] (process_one_work+0x200/0x4f8) > > [ 4.802923] [<c035d594>] (process_one_work) from [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x5d4) > > [ 4.802938] [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread) from [<c0363300>] (kthread+0x150/0x158) > > [ 4.802952] [<c0363300>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) > > [ 4.802957] Exception stack(0xed959fb0 to 0xed959ff8) > > [ 4.802966] 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > > [ 4.802977] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > > [ 4.802986] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 > > [ 4.802993] ---[ end trace b947f9d4c40fa261 ]— > > that is weird since we should be either in a probe context or in hdev->open context and both can sleep as far as I know. okay in this case we can replace gpiod_set_value with gpiod_set_value_cansleep. Stefan > > Regards > > Marcel >
Hi Stefan, >>>>>>> Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). >>>>>>> This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth >>>>>>> subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>>>> index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts >>>>>>> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> &uart0 { >>>>>>> pinctrl-names = "default"; >>>>>>> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; >>>>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; >>>>>>> + status = "okay"; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + bluetooth { >>>>>>> + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; >>>>>>> + max-speed = <2000000>; >>>>>>> + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>>>> + }; >>>>>>> +}; >>>>>> >>>>>> is the shutdown GPIO working as expected with this hardware. So even module unload and reload works fine? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, unload and reload works fine. >>>>> >>>>>> Meaning we are getting back to the 115200 default baud rate on the UART? >>>>> >>>>> I assume that, because reload works as expected. >>>> >>>> awesome. That is good news. >>>> >>>> Since you said that the GPIO expander driver for the RPi 3 has been accepted, did you test it there as well? If so, then it would be good to get a patch that also provides shutdown-gpios for RPi 3. >>> >>> so here comes the bad news. hci_bcm uses gpiod_set_value() which is for interrupt context, but the gpio expander can sleep. So we will get this warning: >>> >>> [ 4.802447] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> [ 4.802485] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 91 at drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:2986 gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58 >>> [ 4.802489] Modules linked in: hci_uart ac97_bus btbcm snd_pcm_dmaengine bluetooth snd_pcm snd_timer ecdh_generic snd soundcore bcm2835_thermal crc32_arm_ce >>> [ 4.802543] CPU: 3 PID: 91 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc3-next-20180302-dirty #4 >>> [ 4.802547] Hardware name: BCM2835 >>> [ 4.802562] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn >>> [ 4.802593] [<c03119a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c030cc24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) >>> [ 4.802612] [<c030cc24>] (show_stack) from [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack+0x8c/0xa0) >>> [ 4.802628] [<c0d8e9dc>] (dump_stack) from [<c0343a2c>] (__warn+0xe0/0xf8) >>> [ 4.802640] [<c0343a2c>] (__warn) from [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x48) >>> [ 4.802652] [<c0343b5c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value+0x50/0x58) >>> [ 4.802693] [<c06d0de0>] (gpiod_set_value) from [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown+0xc/0x14 [hci_uart]) >>> [ 4.802757] [<bf0e2e90>] (bcm_gpio_set_shutdown [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power+0x18/0x140 [hci_uart]) >>> [ 4.802806] [<bf0e2a64>] (bcm_gpio_set_power [hci_uart]) from [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe+0x64/0x9c [hci_uart]) >>> [ 4.802848] [<bf0e2e4c>] (bcm_serdev_probe [hci_uart]) from [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device+0x254/0x32c) >>> [ 4.802863] [<c08f2528>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach+0xa4/0xa8) >>> [ 4.802878] [<c08f26a4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xb4) >>> [ 4.802895] [<c08f08b8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn+0x44/0x108) >>> [ 4.802910] [<c0366498>] (async_run_entry_fn) from [<c035d594>] (process_one_work+0x200/0x4f8) >>> [ 4.802923] [<c035d594>] (process_one_work) from [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x5d4) >>> [ 4.802938] [<c035e4a8>] (worker_thread) from [<c0363300>] (kthread+0x150/0x158) >>> [ 4.802952] [<c0363300>] (kthread) from [<c03010e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) >>> [ 4.802957] Exception stack(0xed959fb0 to 0xed959ff8) >>> [ 4.802966] 9fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >>> [ 4.802977] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >>> [ 4.802986] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 >>> [ 4.802993] ---[ end trace b947f9d4c40fa261 ]— >> >> that is weird since we should be either in a probe context or in hdev->open context and both can sleep as far as I know. > > okay in this case we can replace gpiod_set_value with gpiod_set_value_cansleep. if you do that, does it work for you on both the RPi 3 and Zero W? Regards Marcel
Hi Loic, > > >> > > >> that is weird since we should be either in a probe context or in hdev->open context and both can sleep as far as I know. > > Yes but this is an explicit warning in gpiolib based on gpio controller capabilities, > not on current context (WARN_ON(desc->gdev->chip->can_sleep)). > > So, since we are always in process/thread context here, it seems safe to use the _cansleep version. can someone whip up a patch for it and quickly test it. Regards Marcel
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts index cf53436..b7f79f1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@ &uart0 { pinctrl-names = "default"; - pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio14>; + pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_gpio32 &uart0_ctsrts_gpio30>; + status = "okay"; + + bluetooth { + compatible = "brcm,bcm43438-bt"; + max-speed = <2000000>; + shutdown-gpios = <&gpio 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + }; +}; + +&uart1 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_gpio14>; status = "okay"; };
Add BCM43438 (bluetooth) as a serdev slave device of uart0 (pl011/ttyAMA0). This allows to automatically insert the bcm43438 to the bluetooth subsystem instead of relying on patched userspace helpers (hciattach). In order to keep a debug UART we need to switch to uart1. Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dts | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)