Message ID | 20180302195434.15435-1-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:54:34PM +0000, Richard Haines wrote: > Fix the following error when running regression tests using LTP as follows: > cd /opt/ltp/ > cat runtest/syscalls |grep connect01>runtest/connect-syscall > ./runltp -pq -f connect-syscall > > Running tests....... > connect01 1 TPASS : bad file descriptor successful > connect01 2 TPASS : invalid socket buffer successful > connect01 3 TPASS : invalid salen successful > connect01 4 TPASS : invalid socket successful > connect01 5 TPASS : already connected successful > connect01 6 TPASS : connection refused successful > connect01 7 TFAIL : connect01.c:146: invalid address family ; > returned -1 (expected -1), errno 22 (expected 97) > INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL > LTP Version: 20180118 > > Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> > --- > security/selinux/hooks.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c > index 28a5c4e..d614df1 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c > @@ -4470,22 +4470,29 @@ static int selinux_socket_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address, in > * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have > * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. > */ > - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { > - if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + switch (address->sa_family) { > + case AF_INET: > + if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) > + return -EINVAL; > addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; > snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); > addrp = (char *)&addr4->sin_addr.s_addr; > - } else { > - if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + break; > + case AF_INET6: > + if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) > + return -EINVAL; > addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; > snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); > addrp = (char *)&addr6->sin6_addr.s6_addr; > + break; > + default: > + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas > + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. > + */ > + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > } > > if (snum) { > @@ -4589,16 +4596,27 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect_helper(struct socket *sock, > * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have > * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. > */ > - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { > + switch (address->sa_family) { > + case AF_INET: > addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; > if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) > return -EINVAL; > snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); > - } else { > + break; > + case AF_INET6: > addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; > if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) > return -EINVAL; > snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); > + break; > + default: > + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas > + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. > + */ > + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > } > > err = sel_netport_sid(sk->sk_protocol, snum, &sid); > -- > 2.14.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> wrote: > Fix the following error when running regression tests using LTP as follows: > cd /opt/ltp/ > cat runtest/syscalls |grep connect01>runtest/connect-syscall > ./runltp -pq -f connect-syscall > > Running tests....... > connect01 1 TPASS : bad file descriptor successful > connect01 2 TPASS : invalid socket buffer successful > connect01 3 TPASS : invalid salen successful > connect01 4 TPASS : invalid socket successful > connect01 5 TPASS : already connected successful > connect01 6 TPASS : connection refused successful > connect01 7 TFAIL : connect01.c:146: invalid address family ; > returned -1 (expected -1), errno 22 (expected 97) > INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL > LTP Version: 20180118 > > Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> > --- > security/selinux/hooks.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Merged, thanks guys. > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c > index 28a5c4e..d614df1 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c > @@ -4470,22 +4470,29 @@ static int selinux_socket_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address, in > * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have > * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. > */ > - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { > - if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + switch (address->sa_family) { > + case AF_INET: > + if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) > + return -EINVAL; > addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; > snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); > addrp = (char *)&addr4->sin_addr.s_addr; > - } else { > - if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) { > - err = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > + break; > + case AF_INET6: > + if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) > + return -EINVAL; > addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; > snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); > addrp = (char *)&addr6->sin6_addr.s6_addr; > + break; > + default: > + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas > + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. > + */ > + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > } > > if (snum) { > @@ -4589,16 +4596,27 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect_helper(struct socket *sock, > * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have > * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. > */ > - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { > + switch (address->sa_family) { > + case AF_INET: > addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; > if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) > return -EINVAL; > snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); > - } else { > + break; > + case AF_INET6: > addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; > if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) > return -EINVAL; > snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); > + break; > + default: > + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas > + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. > + */ > + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; > } > > err = sel_netport_sid(sk->sk_protocol, snum, &sid); > -- > 2.14.3 >
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 28a5c4e..d614df1 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -4470,22 +4470,29 @@ static int selinux_socket_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address, in * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. */ - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { - if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } + switch (address->sa_family) { + case AF_INET: + if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) + return -EINVAL; addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); addrp = (char *)&addr4->sin_addr.s_addr; - } else { - if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) { - err = -EINVAL; - goto out; - } + break; + case AF_INET6: + if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) + return -EINVAL; addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); addrp = (char *)&addr6->sin6_addr.s6_addr; + break; + default: + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. + */ + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) + return -EINVAL; + else + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; } if (snum) { @@ -4589,16 +4596,27 @@ static int selinux_socket_connect_helper(struct socket *sock, * need to check address->sa_family as it is possible to have * sk->sk_family = PF_INET6 with addr->sa_family = AF_INET. */ - if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) { + switch (address->sa_family) { + case AF_INET: addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address; if (addrlen < sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) return -EINVAL; snum = ntohs(addr4->sin_port); - } else { + break; + case AF_INET6: addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address; if (addrlen < SIN6_LEN_RFC2133) return -EINVAL; snum = ntohs(addr6->sin6_port); + break; + default: + /* Note that SCTP services expect -EINVAL, whereas + * others expect -EAFNOSUPPORT. + */ + if (sksec->sclass == SECCLASS_SCTP_SOCKET) + return -EINVAL; + else + return -EAFNOSUPPORT; } err = sel_netport_sid(sk->sk_protocol, snum, &sid);
Fix the following error when running regression tests using LTP as follows: cd /opt/ltp/ cat runtest/syscalls |grep connect01>runtest/connect-syscall ./runltp -pq -f connect-syscall Running tests....... connect01 1 TPASS : bad file descriptor successful connect01 2 TPASS : invalid socket buffer successful connect01 3 TPASS : invalid salen successful connect01 4 TPASS : invalid socket successful connect01 5 TPASS : already connected successful connect01 6 TPASS : connection refused successful connect01 7 TFAIL : connect01.c:146: invalid address family ; returned -1 (expected -1), errno 22 (expected 97) INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL LTP Version: 20180118 Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com> --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)