diff mbox

[v3,3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf

Message ID 20180305165614.5469-4-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jarkko Sakkinen March 5, 2018, 4:56 p.m. UTC
In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Mimi Zohar March 5, 2018, 10:52 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jarrko,

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM.  I'm seeing the
following line in dmesg.

[    1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256

Mimi

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> index abe6ef4a7a0b..890d83c5c78b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> @@ -851,22 +851,25 @@ static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>   */
>  int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
> -	struct tpm2_cmd cmd;
> +	struct tpm_output_header *out;
> +	struct tpm_buf buf;
>  	int rc;
> 
> -	cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header;
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100);
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1);
> -
> -	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL);
> -	if (rc <  0)
> +	rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY);
> +	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
> -
> -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS);
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1);
> +	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL);
> +	if (rc <  0)
> +		goto out;
> +	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
> +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
>  		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +out:
> +	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
> +	return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jarkko Sakkinen March 6, 2018, 11:37 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

Jason, is this now OK? I removed the error klog.

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jason Gunthorpe March 6, 2018, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:37:31PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Jason, is this now OK? I removed the error klog.

Sure the log message is gone - but I haven't been auditing your tpm_buf
work..

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jay Freyensee March 8, 2018, 9:47 p.m. UTC | #4
On 3/5/18 8:56 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> index abe6ef4a7a0b..890d83c5c78b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> @@ -851,22 +851,25 @@ static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>    */
>   int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>   {
> -	struct tpm2_cmd cmd;
> +	struct tpm_output_header *out;
> +	struct tpm_buf buf;
>   	int rc;
>   
> -	cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header;
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100);
> -	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1);
> -
> -	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL);
> -	if (rc <  0)
> +	rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY);
> +	if (rc)
>   		return rc;
> -
> -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS);
> +	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1);
> +	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL);
> +	if (rc <  0)
> +		goto out;
> +	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
> +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
>   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +out:
> +	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
> +	return rc;


Looks better :-).


Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>


>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jarkko Sakkinen March 10, 2018, 1:11 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 13:47 -0800, J Freyensee wrote:
> Looks better :-).
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>

Thank you.

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jarkko Sakkinen March 16, 2018, 12:21 p.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Jarrko,
> 
> On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM.  I'm seeing the
> following line in dmesg.
> 
> [    1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256

Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mimi Zohar March 16, 2018, 12:36 p.m. UTC | #7
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 14:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Hi Jarrko,
> > 
> > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> > > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM.  I'm seeing the
> > following line in dmesg.
> > 
> > [    1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256
> 
> Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?

The pi has a TPM 2.0 attached to the GPIO.  James pointed out the
change in return codes.


+       if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
                chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
-
-       return 0;
+out:
+       tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
+       return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jarkko Sakkinen March 19, 2018, 2:42 p.m. UTC | #8
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 08:36:52AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 14:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > Hi Jarrko,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM
> > > > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM.  I'm seeing the
> > > following line in dmesg.
> > > 
> > > [    1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256
> > 
> > Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?
> 
> The pi has a TPM 2.0 attached to the GPIO.  James pointed out the
> change in return codes.
> 
> 
> +       if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
>                 chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> -
> -       return 0;
> +out:
> +       tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
> +       return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);
> 
> Mimi

Oops, thank you James and Mimi for pointing this out. I'll refine
the patch set.

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
index abe6ef4a7a0b..890d83c5c78b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
@@ -851,22 +851,25 @@  static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip)
  */
 int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 {
-	struct tpm2_cmd cmd;
+	struct tpm_output_header *out;
+	struct tpm_buf buf;
 	int rc;
 
-	cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header;
-	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
-	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100);
-	cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1);
-
-	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL);
-	if (rc <  0)
+	rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY);
+	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-
-	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES);
+	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS);
+	tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1);
+	rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL);
+	if (rc <  0)
+		goto out;
+	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
+	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
-
-	return 0;
+out:
+	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
+	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);