Message ID | 9903b02c-041f-38b6-e510-06b9f8744fbb@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:30:02AM +0200, Petr Skočík wrote: > Hi, > > would you be willing to pull something like this? > > static int > @@ -488,7 +490,9 @@ olderf (const char *f1, const char *f2) > > return (stat (f1, &b1) == 0 && > stat (f2, &b2) == 0 && > - b1.st_mtime < b2.st_mtime); > + (b1.st_mtim.tv_sec < b2.st_mtim.tv_sec || > + (b1.st_mtim.tv_sec == b2.st_mtim.tv_sec && (b1.st_mtim.tv_nsec < > b2.st_mtim.tv_nsec ))) > + ); > } > > static int > > I could use greater resolution in `test -nt` / `test -ot`, and st_mtim > field is standardized under POSIX.1-2008 (or so stat(2) says). Sure. But your patch is corrupted. Cheers,
diff --git a/src/bltin/test.c b/src/bltin/test.c index 58c05fe..7ea02f2 100644 --- a/src/bltin/test.c +++ b/src/bltin/test.c @@ -478,7 +478,9 @@ newerf (const char *f1, const char *f2) return (stat (f1, &b1) == 0 && stat (f2, &b2) == 0 && - b1.st_mtime > b2.st_mtime); + ( b1.st_mtim.tv_sec > b2.st_mtim.tv_sec || + (b1.st_mtim.tv_sec == b2.st_mtim.tv_sec && (b1.st_mtim.tv_nsec > b2.st_mtim.tv_nsec ))) + ); }