Message ID | 1520454947-16977-1-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Em Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:35:47PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias escreveu: > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > #define YYDEBUG 1 > > +#include <fnmatch.h> > #include <linux/compiler.h> > #include <linux/list.h> > #include <linux/types.h> > @@ -234,6 +235,10 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config > if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2)) { > struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; > int ok = 0; > + char *pattern; > + > + if (asprintf(&pattern, "%s*", $1) < 0) > + YYABORT; + if (asprintf(&pattern, "?(uncore_)%s*", $1) < 0) I completely overlook that you were using this and thus needed that extension, duh, thanks for the patience 8-) and for the new patch. - Arnaldo
On 2018-03-08 08:03, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:35:47PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias escreveu: >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >> >> #define YYDEBUG 1 >> >> +#include <fnmatch.h> >> #include <linux/compiler.h> >> #include <linux/list.h> >> #include <linux/types.h> >> @@ -234,6 +235,10 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config >> if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2)) { >> struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; >> int ok = 0; >> + char *pattern; >> + >> + if (asprintf(&pattern, "%s*", $1) < 0) >> + YYABORT; > > + if (asprintf(&pattern, "?(uncore_)%s*", $1) < 0) > > I completely overlook that you were using this and thus needed that > extension, duh, thanks for the patience 8-) and for the new patch. > NP Arnaldo, thanks for the quick turnaround on these patches :o) Just so I know, since these are my first patches on perf tools, where are perf tools patches queued once acked? Thanks!
Em Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:28:13AM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias escreveu: > On 2018-03-08 08:03, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:35:47PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias escreveu: > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y > > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > > > > > #define YYDEBUG 1 > > > > > > +#include <fnmatch.h> > > > #include <linux/compiler.h> > > > #include <linux/list.h> > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > @@ -234,6 +235,10 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config > > > if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2)) { > > > struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; > > > int ok = 0; > > > + char *pattern; > > > + > > > + if (asprintf(&pattern, "%s*", $1) < 0) > > > + YYABORT; > > + if (asprintf(&pattern, "?(uncore_)%s*", $1) < 0) > > I completely overlook that you were using this and thus needed that > > extension, duh, thanks for the patience 8-) and for the new patch. Further trying to remove my brown paper bag: I thought the '?(...)' type of thing would be something _users_ would pass on the perf tool command line, not something used by the tool itself, like on the original patch.... :-) > NP Arnaldo, thanks for the quick turnaround on these patches :o) > Just so I know, since these are my first patches on perf tools, > where are perf tools patches queued once acked? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core If they are super urgent, then they will go to a different branch, perf/urgent, that is targetted for the current merge window, i.e. right now: perf/core -> 4.17 perf/urgent -> 4.16 Thanks, and keep the patches flowing! - Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt index e2a897a..2549c34 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt @@ -141,7 +141,13 @@ on the first memory controller on socket 0 of a Intel Xeon system Each memory controller has its own PMU. Measuring the complete system bandwidth would require specifying all imc PMUs (see perf list output), -and adding the values together. +and adding the values together. To simplify creation of multiple events, +prefix and glob matching is supported in the PMU name, and the prefix +'uncore_' is also ignored when performing the match. So the command above +can be expanded to all memory controllers by using the syntaxes: + + perf stat -C 0 -a imc/cas_count_read/,imc/cas_count_write/ -I 1000 ... + perf stat -C 0 -a *imc*/cas_count_read/,*imc*/cas_count_write/ -I 1000 ... This example measures the combined core power every second diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt index 823fce7..5ee954f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ report:: parameters are defined by corresponding entries in /sys/bus/event_source/devices/<pmu>/format/* + Note that the last two syntaxes support prefix and glob matching in + the PMU name to simplify creation of events accross multiple instances + of the same type of PMU in large systems (e.g. memory controller PMUs). + Multiple PMU instances are typical for uncore PMUs, so the prefix + 'uncore_' is also ignored when performing this match. + + -i:: --no-inherit:: child tasks do not inherit counters @@ -246,6 +253,12 @@ taskset. --no-merge:: Do not merge results from same PMUs. +When multiple events are created from a single event alias, stat will, +by default, aggregate the event counts and show the result in a single +row. This option disables that behavior and shows the individual events +and counts. Aliases are listed immediately after the Kernel PMU events +by perf list. + --smi-cost:: Measure SMI cost if msr/aperf/ and msr/smi/ events are supported. diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l index 655ecff..a1a01b1 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.l @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ bpf_source [^,{}]+\.c[a-zA-Z0-9._]* num_dec [0-9]+ num_hex 0x[a-fA-F0-9]+ num_raw_hex [a-fA-F0-9]+ -name [a-zA-Z_*?][a-zA-Z0-9_*?.]* +name [a-zA-Z_*?\[\]][a-zA-Z0-9_*?.\[\]]* name_minus [a-zA-Z_*?][a-zA-Z0-9\-_*?.:]* drv_cfg_term [a-zA-Z0-9_\.]+(=[a-zA-Z0-9_*?\.:]+)? /* If you add a modifier you need to update check_modifier() */ diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y index e81a20e..dedf184 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.y @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #define YYDEBUG 1 +#include <fnmatch.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/types.h> @@ -234,6 +235,10 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config if (parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, $1, $2)) { struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; int ok = 0; + char *pattern; + + if (asprintf(&pattern, "%s*", $1) < 0) + YYABORT; while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) { char *name = pmu->name; @@ -241,14 +246,19 @@ PE_NAME opt_event_config if (!strncmp(name, "uncore_", 7) && strncmp($1, "uncore_", 7)) name += 7; - if (!strncmp($1, name, strlen($1))) { - if (parse_events_copy_term_list(orig_terms, &terms)) + if (!fnmatch(pattern, name, 0)) { + if (parse_events_copy_term_list(orig_terms, &terms)) { + free(pattern); YYABORT; + } if (!parse_events_add_pmu(_parse_state, list, pmu->name, terms)) ok++; parse_events_terms__delete(terms); } } + + free(pattern); + if (!ok) YYABORT; }
Starting on v4.12 event parsing code for dynamic pmu events already supports prefix-based matching of multiple pmus when creating dynamic events. E.g., in a system with the following dynamic pmus: mypmu_0 mypmu_1 mypmu_2 mypmu_4 passing mypmu/<config>/ as an event spec will result in the creation of the event in all of the pmus. This change expands this matching through the use of fnmatch so glob-like expressions can be used to create events in multiple pmus. E.g., in the system described above if a user only wants to create the event in mypmu_0 and mypmu_1, mypmu_[01]/<config>/ can be passed. Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> --- tools/perf/Documentation/perf-list.txt | 8 +++++++- tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/parse-events.l | 2 +- tools/perf/util/parse-events.y | 14 ++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.