Message ID | 9a5c962bd3a225cfa87d6dcb0f6bb85697991c66.1519620578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 26/02/18 05:09, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after > calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers > don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the > policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. > > Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> FWIW, Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c index c32a833e1b00..7b31efe53252 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c @@ -150,13 +150,7 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } policy->driver_data = priv; - - ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table); - if (ret) { - dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: invalid frequency table: %d\n", __func__, - ret); - goto out_put_clk; - } + policy->freq_table = freq_table; /* scpi allows DVFS request for any domain from any CPU */ policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true; @@ -170,8 +164,6 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->fast_switch_possible = false; return 0; -out_put_clk: - clk_put(priv->clk); out_free_cpufreq_table: dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table); out_free_priv:
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now. Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)