| Message ID | 1520940019-68977-1-git-send-email-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: > mode_valid function is missing for lvds. > > Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> Applied, thanks! Maxime
Hello Giulio, this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, with it there's no output. Some more info below... On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: > mode_valid function is missing for lvds. > > Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > } > } > > +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) > +{ > + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); > + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; > + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; > + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; > + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; > + long rounded_rate; > + > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); > + > + if (hsync < 1) > + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; > + > + if (hsync > 0x3ff) > + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; > + > + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) > + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; > + > + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) > + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; > + > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); > + > + if (vsync < 1) > + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; > + > + if (vsync > 0x3ff) > + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; > + > + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) > + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; > + > + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) > + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; > + > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); > + > + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; > + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; Why would validation function change any state anywhere? > + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 > + if (rounded_rate < rate) > + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; > + > + if (rounded_rate > rate) > + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? thank you, Ondrej > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clock rate OK\n"); > + > + return MODE_OK; > +} > + > static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_helper_funcs = { > .disable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable, > .enable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_enable, > + .mode_valid = sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid, > }; > > static const struct drm_encoder_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_funcs = {
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ondřej Jirman <doudahwezomiechahtah@xff.cz> wrote: > Hello Giulio, > > this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, > with it there's no output. > > Some more info below... > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: >> mode_valid function is missing for lvds. >> >> Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >> index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >> @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) >> } >> } >> >> +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, >> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) >> +{ >> + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); >> + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; >> + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; >> + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; >> + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; >> + long rounded_rate; >> + >> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); >> + >> + if (hsync < 1) >> + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; >> + >> + if (hsync > 0x3ff) >> + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; >> + >> + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) >> + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; >> + >> + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) >> + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; >> + >> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); >> + >> + if (vsync < 1) >> + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; >> + >> + if (vsync > 0x3ff) >> + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; >> + >> + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) >> + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; >> + >> + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) >> + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; >> + >> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); >> + >> + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; >> + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; > > Why would validation function change any state anywhere? > >> + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); > > The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... > > sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 > vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 > >> + if (rounded_rate < rate) >> + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; >> + >> + if (rounded_rate > rate) >> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; > > ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. > > But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an agreement. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/ ChenYu > > thank you, > Ondrej > >> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clock rate OK\n"); >> + >> + return MODE_OK; >> +} >> + >> static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_helper_funcs = { >> .disable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable, >> .enable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_enable, >> + .mode_valid = sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid, >> }; >> >> static const struct drm_encoder_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_funcs = {
Hi everybody, Il 19/04/2018 15:36, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ondřej Jirman > <doudahwezomiechahtah@xff.cz> wrote: >> Hello Giulio, >> >> this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, >> with it there's no output. >> >> Some more info below... >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: >>> mode_valid function is missing for lvds. >>> >>> Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >>> index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c >>> @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) >>> } >>> } >>> >>> +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, >>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) >>> +{ >>> + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); >>> + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; >>> + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; >>> + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; >>> + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; >>> + long rounded_rate; >>> + >>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); >>> + >>> + if (hsync < 1) >>> + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; >>> + >>> + if (hsync > 0x3ff) >>> + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; >>> + >>> + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) >>> + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; >>> + >>> + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) >>> + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; >>> + >>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); >>> + >>> + if (vsync < 1) >>> + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; >>> + >>> + if (vsync > 0x3ff) >>> + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; >>> + >>> + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) >>> + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; >>> + >>> + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) >>> + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; >>> + >>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); >>> + >>> + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; >>> + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; >> >> Why would validation function change any state anywhere? >> >>> + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); >> >> The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... >> >> sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 >> vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 >> >>> + if (rounded_rate < rate) >>> + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; >>> + >>> + if (rounded_rate > rate) >>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; >> >> ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. >> >> But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? > > This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an > agreement. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/ Thanks for pointing that Thread ChenYu. So the only chance is to trim frequency according to encoder capabilities. I agree to block when encoder can't provide frequency specified, otherwise you could drive you panel at the near the lowest(highest) frequency and get out of limits for a few without knowing it. Best regards
Hello, On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Il 19/04/2018 15:36, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ondřej Jirman > > <doudahwezomiechahtah@xff.cz> wrote: > > > Hello Giulio, > > > > > > this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, > > > with it there's no output. > > > > > > Some more info below... > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > > mode_valid function is missing for lvds. > > > > > > > > Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, > > > > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); > > > > + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; > > > > + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; > > > > + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; > > > > + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; > > > > + long rounded_rate; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); > > > > + > > > > + if (hsync < 1) > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; > > > > + > > > > + if (hsync > 0x3ff) > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) > > > > + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) > > > > + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); > > > > + > > > > + if (vsync < 1) > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; > > > > + > > > > + if (vsync > 0x3ff) > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) > > > > + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) > > > > + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); > > > > + > > > > + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; > > > > + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; > > > > > > Why would validation function change any state anywhere? > > > > > > > + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); > > > > > > The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... > > > > > > sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 > > > vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 > > > > > > > + if (rounded_rate < rate) > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; > > > > + > > > > + if (rounded_rate > rate) > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; > > > > > > ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. > > > > > > But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? > > > > This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an > > agreement. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/ > > Thanks for pointing that Thread ChenYu. > So the only chance is to trim frequency according to encoder capabilities. > I agree to block when encoder can't provide frequency specified, > otherwise you could drive you panel at the near the lowest(highest) > frequency and get out of limits for a few without knowing it. When I set the range of pixel clock frequencies on simple-panel connected to this encoder, the check still fails, so there's something not working there as expected. This check is only called once with a typical frequency. I guess drm doesn't implement clock-frequency range on panels. But I haven't looked. I can set the exact frequency that the SoC can provide on the simple-panel, but that's a bit of a hack. regards, o. > Best regards > > -- > Giulio Benetti
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > Il 19/04/2018 15:36, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ondřej Jirman > > > <doudahwezomiechahtah@xff.cz> wrote: > > > > Hello Giulio, > > > > > > > > this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, > > > > with it there's no output. > > > > > > > > Some more info below... > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > > > mode_valid function is missing for lvds. > > > > > > > > > > Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > > index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > > @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > > > > > } > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, > > > > > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); > > > > > + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; > > > > > + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; > > > > > + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; > > > > > + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; > > > > > + long rounded_rate; > > > > > + > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); > > > > > + > > > > > + if (hsync < 1) > > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (hsync > 0x3ff) > > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) > > > > > + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) > > > > > + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; > > > > > + > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); > > > > > + > > > > > + if (vsync < 1) > > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (vsync > 0x3ff) > > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) > > > > > + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) > > > > > + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; > > > > > + > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); > > > > > + > > > > > + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; > > > > > + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; > > > > > > > > Why would validation function change any state anywhere? > > > > > > > > > + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); > > > > > > > > The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... > > > > > > > > sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 > > > > vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 > > > > > > > > > + if (rounded_rate < rate) > > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; > > > > > + > > > > > + if (rounded_rate > rate) > > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; > > > > > > > > ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. > > > > > > > > But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? > > > > > > This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an > > > agreement. > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/ > > > > Thanks for pointing that Thread ChenYu. > > So the only chance is to trim frequency according to encoder capabilities. > > I agree to block when encoder can't provide frequency specified, > > otherwise you could drive you panel at the near the lowest(highest) > > frequency and get out of limits for a few without knowing it. > > When I set the range of pixel clock frequencies on simple-panel connected > to this encoder, the check still fails, so there's something not working > there as expected. This check is only called once with a typical frequency. > > I guess drm doesn't implement clock-frequency range on panels. But I haven't > looked. It does, but only omapdss is able to use it iirc. We could do it too, but that would be way out of scope for a fix. > I can set the exact frequency that the SoC can provide on the simple-panel, > but that's a bit of a hack. Yes. And if the only device using this thus far is broken, that's not really great either. Can you send a revert? Thanks! Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) } } +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) +{ + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; + long rounded_rate; + + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); + + if (hsync < 1) + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; + + if (hsync > 0x3ff) + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; + + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; + + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; + + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); + + if (vsync < 1) + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; + + if (vsync > 0x3ff) + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; + + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; + + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; + + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); + + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); + if (rounded_rate < rate) + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; + + if (rounded_rate > rate) + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; + + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clock rate OK\n"); + + return MODE_OK; +} + static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_helper_funcs = { .disable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable, .enable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_enable, + .mode_valid = sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid, }; static const struct drm_encoder_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_funcs = {
mode_valid function is missing for lvds. Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)