| Message ID | 1523864464-41059-5-git-send-email-xiaolei.li@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:41:04 +0800 Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote: > For some MTK NAND chips, BootROM will access more than one byte > ECC protected FDM data, but now we fix ECC protected FDM byte as 1. > This will make some chips be failed to boot up. > > This patch adds one new nfc capability maximize_fdm_ecc to maximize ECC > protected FDM bytes if it is true. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > old mode 100644 > new mode 100755 > index 03a4df2..7025132 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct mtk_nfc_caps { > u8 pageformat_spare_shift; > u8 nfi_clk_div; > u8 max_sector; > + bool maximize_fdm_ecc; > }; > > struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl { > @@ -1151,8 +1152,8 @@ static void mtk_nfc_set_fdm(struct mtk_nfc_fdm *fdm, struct mtd_info *mtd) > if (fdm->reg_size > NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE) > fdm->reg_size = NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE; > > - /* bad block mark storage */ > - fdm->ecc_size = 1; > + /* Reserve at least one byte for bad mark */ > + fdm->ecc_size = nfc->caps->maximize_fdm_ecc ? fdm->reg_size : 1; > } > > static void mtk_nfc_set_bad_mark_ctl(struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl *bm_ctl, > @@ -1413,6 +1414,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, > .nfi_clk_div = 1, > .max_sector = 16, > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > }; > > static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt2712 = { > @@ -1423,6 +1425,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > .pageformat_spare_shift = 16, > .nfi_clk_div = 2, > .max_sector = 16, > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > }; > > static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt7622 = { > @@ -1433,6 +1436,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, > .nfi_clk_div = 1, > .max_sector = 8, > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > }; So, you introduce a new flag, but all existing SoCs are setting it to false. Can you please send a patch series containing all the modifications, or at least point to a branch containing all the changes you intend to push so that we know why the changes are required? Your first version of this patchset was better in this regard. > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_nfc_id_table[] = {
Hi Boris On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 22:23 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 15:41:04 +0800 > Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > For some MTK NAND chips, BootROM will access more than one byte > > ECC protected FDM data, but now we fix ECC protected FDM byte as 1. > > This will make some chips be failed to boot up. > > > > This patch adds one new nfc capability maximize_fdm_ecc to maximize ECC > > protected FDM bytes if it is true. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> > > --- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > old mode 100644 > > new mode 100755 > > index 03a4df2..7025132 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c > > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct mtk_nfc_caps { > > u8 pageformat_spare_shift; > > u8 nfi_clk_div; > > u8 max_sector; > > + bool maximize_fdm_ecc; > > }; > > > > struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl { > > @@ -1151,8 +1152,8 @@ static void mtk_nfc_set_fdm(struct mtk_nfc_fdm *fdm, struct mtd_info *mtd) > > if (fdm->reg_size > NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE) > > fdm->reg_size = NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE; > > > > - /* bad block mark storage */ > > - fdm->ecc_size = 1; > > + /* Reserve at least one byte for bad mark */ > > + fdm->ecc_size = nfc->caps->maximize_fdm_ecc ? fdm->reg_size : 1; > > } > > > > static void mtk_nfc_set_bad_mark_ctl(struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl *bm_ctl, > > @@ -1413,6 +1414,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > > .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, > > .nfi_clk_div = 1, > > .max_sector = 16, > > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt2712 = { > > @@ -1423,6 +1425,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > > .pageformat_spare_shift = 16, > > .nfi_clk_div = 2, > > .max_sector = 16, > > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt7622 = { > > @@ -1433,6 +1436,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) > > .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, > > .nfi_clk_div = 1, > > .max_sector = 8, > > + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, > > }; > > So, you introduce a new flag, but all existing SoCs are setting it to > false. Can you please send a patch series containing all the OK. Because some MTK SoCs that will apply "true" setting have not been upstreamed now, so I think it is better to send a patch series in the future as your advice. I will remove this patch in v3. Sorry for making you confused. Thanks. Xiaolei > modifications, or at least point to a branch containing all the changes > you intend to push so that we know why the changes are required? > Your first version of this patchset was better in this regard. > > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_nfc_id_table[] = { >
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index 03a4df2..7025132 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct mtk_nfc_caps { u8 pageformat_spare_shift; u8 nfi_clk_div; u8 max_sector; + bool maximize_fdm_ecc; }; struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl { @@ -1151,8 +1152,8 @@ static void mtk_nfc_set_fdm(struct mtk_nfc_fdm *fdm, struct mtd_info *mtd) if (fdm->reg_size > NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE) fdm->reg_size = NFI_FDM_MAX_SIZE; - /* bad block mark storage */ - fdm->ecc_size = 1; + /* Reserve at least one byte for bad mark */ + fdm->ecc_size = nfc->caps->maximize_fdm_ecc ? fdm->reg_size : 1; } static void mtk_nfc_set_bad_mark_ctl(struct mtk_nfc_bad_mark_ctl *bm_ctl, @@ -1413,6 +1414,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, .nfi_clk_div = 1, .max_sector = 16, + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, }; static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt2712 = { @@ -1423,6 +1425,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) .pageformat_spare_shift = 16, .nfi_clk_div = 2, .max_sector = 16, + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, }; static const struct mtk_nfc_caps mtk_nfc_caps_mt7622 = { @@ -1433,6 +1436,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_nand_chips_init(struct device *dev, struct mtk_nfc *nfc) .pageformat_spare_shift = 4, .nfi_clk_div = 1, .max_sector = 8, + .maximize_fdm_ecc = false, }; static const struct of_device_id mtk_nfc_id_table[] = {
For some MTK NAND chips, BootROM will access more than one byte ECC protected FDM data, but now we fix ECC protected FDM byte as 1. This will make some chips be failed to boot up. This patch adds one new nfc capability maximize_fdm_ecc to maximize ECC protected FDM bytes if it is true. Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c