Message ID | 20180419140641.27926-19-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:05:48 +0200 Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> wrote: > We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via > platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Applied, thanks. Jonathan > --- > > Build tested only. buildbot is happy. Please apply individually. > > drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c > index a620eb5ce202..3df6c0e09832 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c > @@ -448,8 +448,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensors_core_write); > > static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev) > { > - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > if (st->curr_sampl_freq == 0) > @@ -471,8 +470,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev) > > static void __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_complete(struct device *dev) > { > - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > if (st->curr_sampl_freq == 0) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c index a620eb5ce202..3df6c0e09832 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c @@ -448,8 +448,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cros_ec_sensors_core_write); static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev) { - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); if (st->curr_sampl_freq == 0) @@ -471,8 +470,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_prepare(struct device *dev) static void __maybe_unused cros_ec_sensors_complete(struct device *dev) { - struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev); if (st->curr_sampl_freq == 0)
We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> --- Build tested only. buildbot is happy. Please apply individually. drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)