| Message ID | 20180426092848.23069-1-s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: > From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> > > current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and may lead > to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks in addition the original code > initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. > This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for correct initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. > if this peer information is not available, we initialize the parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary workaround according > to the QCA sourcecodes. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> > > v2: remove debug messages > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c > @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, > if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) > arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; > > - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) > + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { > arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; > + } > > /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA > * supports VHT. > @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, > arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( > __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); > > - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", > - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); > + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { > + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); > + } So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. From what I can tell, the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but if peer is VHT-160, then of course it can only talk at 2x2. So, I don't think you can just look at the peer_num_spatial_streams here. > - if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && > - (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { > - switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { > - case 1560: > - /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ > - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; > - break; > - case 780: > - /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ > - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; > - break; > - } This old code does look wrong, the firmware is using zero-based, so override-0 == nss-1, override-1 == nss-2. This is confusing enough that it deserves a comment in the code I think.... > + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80) { > + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override |= BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); > } > + > + /* In very exceptional conditions it is observed that > + * firmware was receiving bw_rxnss_override as 0 for peer from host, and resulting in Target Assert. > + * Changing the rxnss_override to minimum nss. This is a temporary WAR. Needs to be fixed > + * properly. > + */ > + if (!arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160)) { > + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE; > + } > + > + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", > + sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); > } > > static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, > @@ -2696,9 +2700,9 @@ static int ath10k_peer_assoc_prepare(struct ath10k *ar, > ath10k_peer_assoc_h_crypto(ar, vif, sta, arg); > ath10k_peer_assoc_h_rates(ar, vif, sta, arg); > ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht(ar, vif, sta, arg); > + ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); > ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(ar, vif, sta, arg); > ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(ar, vif, sta, arg); > - ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > index 2c36256a441d..7d72fdc703c8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > @@ -7212,9 +7212,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k *ar, void *buf, > > ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); > if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) > - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = > - __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | > - BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); > + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = __cpu_to_le32(arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override); > else > cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h > index 46ae19bb2c92..1fe0aa5523a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h > @@ -6380,7 +6380,19 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { > __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ > } __packed; > > -#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) Older FW does not pay attention to the 80_80 bits. It uses masks so it is backwards-compat, but maybe worth a comment. > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_M (0x0000003F) > + > +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) + 1) > +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) + 1) > + > +/* Values defined to set 160 MHz Bandwidth NSS Mapping into FW*/ > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M)) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M)) > > struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { > struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; > Thanks, Ben
Am 26.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Ben Greear: > On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: >> From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >> >> current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on >> guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and may >> lead >> to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is >> required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks in >> addition the original code >> initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. >> This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for correct >> initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. >> if this peer information is not available, we initialize the >> parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary >> workaround according >> to the QCA sourcecodes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >> >> v2: remove debug messages >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 >> +++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- >> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >> @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct >> ath10k *ar, >> if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) >> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; >> >> - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) >> + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { >> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; >> + } >> >> /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA >> * supports VHT. >> @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct >> ath10k *ar, >> arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( >> __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); >> >> - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d >> flags 0x%x\n", >> - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == >> MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { >> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >> + } > > So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. From > what I can tell, > the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but if > peer is VHT-160, > then of course it can only talk at 2x2. > > So, I don't think you can just look at the peer_num_spatial_streams here. no? rxnss_override is only taked if peer phymode is vht160 or vht80_80. vht80 is not considered in that code PEER phy_mode, not HOST phy_mode this parameter is a assoc per peer parameter as far as i can say here. consider that the firmware will accept anything except 0 for peer_bw_rxnss_override in vht160 operation mode if a peer is 80 mhz, the code will be skipped here. > > >> - if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && >> - (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { >> - switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { >> - case 1560: >> - /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ >> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; >> - break; >> - case 780: >> - /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ >> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; >> - break; >> - } > > This old code does look wrong, the firmware is using zero-based, so > override-0 == nss-1, override-1 == nss-2. 0 = crash and 1 and 2 is wrong. +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) > > This is confusing enough that it deserves a comment in the code I > think.... the removal doesnt deserve a comment. i dont know how to explain that its simply wrong. it uses the wrong bit masks and this has been written in the initial patch description > >> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && arg->peer_phymode == >> MODE_11AC_VHT80_80) { >> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override |= >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >> } >> + >> + /* In very exceptional conditions it is observed that >> + * firmware was receiving bw_rxnss_override as 0 for peer from >> host, and resulting in Target Assert. >> + * Changing the rxnss_override to minimum nss. This is a >> temporary WAR. Needs to be fixed >> + * properly. >> + */ >> + if (!arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == >> MODE_11AC_VHT80_80 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160)) { >> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE; >> + } >> + >> + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d >> flags 0x%x\n", >> + sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >> } >> >> static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, >> @@ -2696,9 +2700,9 @@ static int ath10k_peer_assoc_prepare(struct >> ath10k *ar, >> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_crypto(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_rates(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> + ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> - ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >> >> return 0; >> } >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >> index 2c36256a441d..7d72fdc703c8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >> @@ -7212,9 +7212,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k >> *ar, void *buf, >> >> ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); >> if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) >> - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >> - __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | >> - BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); >> + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >> __cpu_to_le32(arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override); >> else >> cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; >> } >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >> index 46ae19bb2c92..1fe0aa5523a6 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >> @@ -6380,7 +6380,19 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >> __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ >> } __packed; >> >> -#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) > > Older FW does not pay attention to the 80_80 bits. It uses masks so > it is > backwards-compat, but maybe worth a comment. i took that masks from recent 3.5.3 based qca code. its correct and if its backward compatible, it's still correct i mean the old code did not coment anything. so dont know how to write anything more about it now. see patch description > >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_M (0x0000003F) >> + >> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) ((((x) & >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) + 1) >> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) ((((x) & >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) + 1) >> + >> +/* Values defined to set 160 MHz Bandwidth NSS Mapping into FW*/ >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | >> (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M)) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | >> (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) & >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M)) >> >> struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >> struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; >> > > Thanks, > Ben >
On 04/26/2018 01:21 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > Am 26.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Ben Greear: >> On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: >>> From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>> >>> current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and may lead >>> to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks in addition the original code >>> initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. >>> This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for correct initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. >>> if this peer information is not available, we initialize the parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary workaround according >>> to the QCA sourcecodes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>> >>> v2: remove debug messages >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- >>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>> @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, >>> if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) >>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; >>> >>> - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) >>> + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { >>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; >>> + } >>> >>> /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA >>> * supports VHT. >>> @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, >>> arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( >>> __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); >>> >>> - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", >>> - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { >>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>> + } >> >> So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. From what I can tell, >> the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but if peer is VHT-160, >> then of course it can only talk at 2x2. >> >> So, I don't think you can just look at the peer_num_spatial_streams here. > no? rxnss_override is only taked if peer phymode is vht160 or vht80_80. vht80 is not considered in that code PEER phy_mode, not HOST phy_mode > this parameter is a assoc per peer parameter as far as i can say here. > consider that the firmware will accept anything except 0 for peer_bw_rxnss_override in vht160 operation mode > if a peer is 80 mhz, the code will be skipped here. From what I can tell, this feature is supposed to configure the rate-ctrl in the firmware to know that it can only send 1x1 or 2x2 when sending at 160Mhz, but that it can send at higher NSS if it sends at 80Mhz or lower. If a 2x2 peer connects to the AP, will it have peer_num_spatial_streams set to 2? If so, then your code will configure the peer_bw_rxnss_override to indicate it can send at 160Mhz 2x2 as well, right? And if so, then that is incorrect. Probably if you connected something like a IPQ4019 station to a 9984 AP configured for 160Mhz, the peer_bw_rxnss_override would be set to 2x2 instead of 1x1? >>> - if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && >>> - (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { >>> - switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { >>> - case 1560: >>> - /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ >>> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; >>> - break; >>> - case 780: >>> - /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ >>> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; >>> - break; >>> - } >> >> This old code does look wrong, the firmware is using zero-based, so override-0 == nss-1, override-1 == nss-2. > 0 = crash > > and 1 and 2 is wrong. Yes, it should be 0 and 1. The old code | in the (1<<31) later. > > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) > +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) >> >> This is confusing enough that it deserves a comment in the code I think.... > the removal doesnt deserve a comment. i dont know how to explain that its simply wrong. it uses the wrong > bit masks and this has been written in the initial patch description I think a comment like this would be helpful: /* Note that the rxnss_override is 0 based, so 0 means nss-1 and 7 means nss-8. */ >> >>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80) { >>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override |= BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>> } >>> + >>> + /* In very exceptional conditions it is observed that >>> + * firmware was receiving bw_rxnss_override as 0 for peer from host, and resulting in Target Assert. >>> + * Changing the rxnss_override to minimum nss. This is a temporary WAR. Needs to be fixed >>> + * properly. >>> + */ >>> + if (!arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160)) { >>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE; >>> + } >>> + >>> + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", >>> + sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>> } >>> >>> static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, >>> @@ -2696,9 +2700,9 @@ static int ath10k_peer_assoc_prepare(struct ath10k *ar, >>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_crypto(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_rates(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> + ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> - ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>> index 2c36256a441d..7d72fdc703c8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>> @@ -7212,9 +7212,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k *ar, void *buf, >>> >>> ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); >>> if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) >>> - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >>> - __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | >>> - BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); >>> + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = __cpu_to_le32(arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override); >>> else >>> cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; >>> } >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>> index 46ae19bb2c92..1fe0aa5523a6 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>> @@ -6380,7 +6380,19 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >>> __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ >>> } __packed; >>> >>> -#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) >> >> Older FW does not pay attention to the 80_80 bits. It uses masks so it is >> backwards-compat, but maybe worth a comment. > i took that masks from recent 3.5.3 based qca code. its correct and if its backward compatible, it's still correct > i mean the old code did not coment anything. so dont know how to write anything more about it now. see patch description > >> >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_M (0x0000003F) >>> + >>> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) + 1) >>> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) + 1) >>> + >>> +/* Values defined to set 160 MHz Bandwidth NSS Mapping into FW*/ >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M)) >>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M)) >>> >>> struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >>> struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; >>> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> > Thanks, Ben
Am 26.04.2018 um 22:35 schrieb Ben Greear: > On 04/26/2018 01:21 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >> Am 26.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Ben Greear: >>> On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: >>>> From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>> >>>> current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on >>>> guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and >>>> may lead >>>> to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is >>>> required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks >>>> in addition the original code >>>> initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. >>>> This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for >>>> correct initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. >>>> if this peer information is not available, we initialize the >>>> parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary >>>> workaround according >>>> to the QCA sourcecodes. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>> >>>> v2: remove debug messages >>>> --- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- >>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>> @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct >>>> ath10k *ar, >>>> if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) >>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; >>>> >>>> - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) >>>> + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { >>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; >>>> + } >>>> >>>> /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA >>>> * supports VHT. >>>> @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct >>>> ath10k *ar, >>>> arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( >>>> __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); >>>> >>>> - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d >>>> flags 0x%x\n", >>>> - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == >>>> MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { >>>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >>>> BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>>> + } >>> >>> So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. >>> From what I can tell, >>> the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but if >>> peer is VHT-160, >>> then of course it can only talk at 2x2. >>> >>> So, I don't think you can just look at the peer_num_spatial_streams >>> here. >> no? rxnss_override is only taked if peer phymode is vht160 or >> vht80_80. vht80 is not considered in that code PEER phy_mode, not >> HOST phy_mode >> this parameter is a assoc per peer parameter as far as i can say here. >> consider that the firmware will accept anything except 0 for >> peer_bw_rxnss_override in vht160 operation mode >> if a peer is 80 mhz, the code will be skipped here. > > From what I can tell, this feature is supposed to configure the > rate-ctrl in the firmware to know that > it can only send 1x1 or 2x2 when sending at 160Mhz, but that it can > send at higher NSS if it sends > at 80Mhz or lower. right. but thats exactly what it should does in case that a peer is connecting with vht160 / 80_80 and the peer itself does also send his own nss capabilities which is used if available. if not ,it uses the fallback. > > If a 2x2 peer connects to the AP, will it have > peer_num_spatial_streams set to 2? yes. i had some debug code in my initial early versions. the peer does transmit his own nss capabilities. > If so, > then your code will configure the peer_bw_rxnss_override to indicate > it can send at 160Mhz > 2x2 as well, right? And if so, then that is incorrect. no. since nss_override is only set if peer phymode is 160 mhz as well > > Probably if you connected something like a IPQ4019 station to a 9984 > AP configured for 160Mhz, > the peer_bw_rxnss_override would be set to 2x2 instead of 1x1? depends how the ipq4019 chipset is configured. if it itself is configured to 160 mhz and configured to 2x2, yes but the peer itself can also send with 1x1, then the ap will also send just 1x1 but as i said. this all is just used if the peer is configured to vht160 and if num_spatial_stream is set by peer. of not this is all ignored and only 1<<31 is masked. this way has been taken from qca's propertiery code or lets say not taken but the behaviour has been translated > > >>>> - if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && >>>> - (sta->vht_cap.cap & >>>> IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { >>>> - switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { >>>> - case 1560: >>>> - /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ >>>> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; >>>> - break; >>>> - case 780: >>>> - /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ >>>> - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; >>>> - break; >>>> - } >>> >>> This old code does look wrong, the firmware is using zero-based, so >>> override-0 == nss-1, override-1 == nss-2. >> 0 = crash >> >> and 1 and 2 is wrong. > > Yes, it should be 0 and 1. The old code | in the (1<<31) later. no just just 0 and 1 consider the 80+80 case which may me | 1<<3 in addition 80+80 has a independend mapping. 1<<31 must be set in any way if vht160 or vht80+80 is configured in 80+80, both vht160 and 80+80 must be configured to 1x1 or 2x2 in vht160 only the vht160 part must be masked. > >> >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) >> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) >>> >>> This is confusing enough that it deserves a comment in the code I >>> think.... >> the removal doesnt deserve a comment. i dont know how to explain that >> its simply wrong. it uses the wrong >> bit masks and this has been written in the initial patch description > > I think a comment like this would be helpful: > > /* Note that the rxnss_override is 0 based, so 0 means nss-1 and 7 > means nss-8. */ > >>> >>>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && arg->peer_phymode == >>>> MODE_11AC_VHT80_80) { >>>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override |= >>>> BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>>> } >>>> + >>>> + /* In very exceptional conditions it is observed that >>>> + * firmware was receiving bw_rxnss_override as 0 for peer from >>>> host, and resulting in Target Assert. >>>> + * Changing the rxnss_override to minimum nss. This is a >>>> temporary WAR. Needs to be fixed >>>> + * properly. >>>> + */ >>>> + if (!arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == >>>> MODE_11AC_VHT80_80 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160)) { >>>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d >>>> flags 0x%x\n", >>>> + sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>>> } >>>> >>>> static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, >>>> @@ -2696,9 +2700,9 @@ static int ath10k_peer_assoc_prepare(struct >>>> ath10k *ar, >>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_crypto(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_rates(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> + ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> - ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); >>>> >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>>> index 2c36256a441d..7d72fdc703c8 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c >>>> @@ -7212,9 +7212,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k >>>> *ar, void *buf, >>>> >>>> ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); >>>> if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) >>>> - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >>>> - __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | >>>> - BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); >>>> + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >>>> __cpu_to_le32(arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override); >>>> else >>>> cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; >>>> } >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>>> index 46ae19bb2c92..1fe0aa5523a6 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h >>>> @@ -6380,7 +6380,19 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >>>> __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ >>>> } __packed; >>>> >>>> -#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) >>> >>> Older FW does not pay attention to the 80_80 bits. It uses masks so >>> it is >>> backwards-compat, but maybe worth a comment. >> i took that masks from recent 3.5.3 based qca code. its correct and >> if its backward compatible, it's still correct >> i mean the old code did not coment anything. so dont know how to >> write anything more about it now. see patch description >> >>> >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_M (0x0000003F) >>>> + >>>> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) ((((x) & >>>> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) + 1) >>>> +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) ((((x) & >>>> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) + 1) >>>> + >>>> +/* Values defined to set 160 MHz Bandwidth NSS Mapping into FW*/ >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) >>>> << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M)) >>>> +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - >>>> 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M)) >>>> >>>> struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { >>>> struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd; >>>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >> > > Thanks, > Ben >
On 04/26/2018 09:40 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > Am 26.04.2018 um 22:35 schrieb Ben Greear: >> On 04/26/2018 01:21 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>> Am 26.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Ben Greear: >>>> On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: >>>>> From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>>> >>>>> current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and may lead >>>>> to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks in addition the original code >>>>> initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. >>>>> This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for correct initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. >>>>> if this peer information is not available, we initialize the parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary workaround according >>>>> to the QCA sourcecodes. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>>> >>>>> v2: remove debug messages >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- >>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>> @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, >>>>> if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) >>>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; >>>>> >>>>> - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) >>>>> + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { >>>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; >>>>> + } >>>>> >>>>> /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA >>>>> * supports VHT. >>>>> @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, >>>>> arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( >>>>> __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); >>>>> >>>>> - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", >>>>> - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>>>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { >>>>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>>>> + } >>>> >>>> So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. From what I can tell, >>>> the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but if peer is VHT-160, >>>> then of course it can only talk at 2x2. >>>> >>>> So, I don't think you can just look at the peer_num_spatial_streams here. >>> no? rxnss_override is only taked if peer phymode is vht160 or vht80_80. vht80 is not considered in that code PEER phy_mode, not HOST phy_mode >>> this parameter is a assoc per peer parameter as far as i can say here. >>> consider that the firmware will accept anything except 0 for peer_bw_rxnss_override in vht160 operation mode >>> if a peer is 80 mhz, the code will be skipped here. >> >> From what I can tell, this feature is supposed to configure the rate-ctrl in the firmware to know that >> it can only send 1x1 or 2x2 when sending at 160Mhz, but that it can send at higher NSS if it sends >> at 80Mhz or lower. > right. but thats exactly what it should does in case that a peer is connecting with vht160 / 80_80 > and the peer itself does also send his own nss capabilities which is used if available. if not ,it uses the fallback. >> >> If a 2x2 peer connects to the AP, will it have peer_num_spatial_streams set to 2? > yes. i had some debug code in my initial early versions. the peer does transmit his own nss capabilities. >> If so, >> then your code will configure the peer_bw_rxnss_override to indicate it can send at 160Mhz >> 2x2 as well, right? And if so, then that is incorrect. > no. since nss_override is only set if peer phymode is 160 mhz as well The peer can run at 2x2 80Mhz and 1x1 160Mhz at the same time, so it can advertise 2x2 nss and phy-mode of 160Mhz when associating to the 160Mhz AP, but the peer can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz. There is no standard way I know of for the peer to tell you specifically that it can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz and also 2x2 at 80Mhz in this case. That is why this rxnns_override exists, to hack around this problem. Your patch is going to break in this case as far as I can tell. Thanks, Ben
Am 27.04.2018 um 18:07 schrieb Ben Greear: > On 04/26/2018 09:40 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >> Am 26.04.2018 um 22:35 schrieb Ben Greear: >>> On 04/26/2018 01:21 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>>> Am 26.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Ben Greear: >>>>> On 04/26/2018 02:28 AM, s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com wrote: >>>>>> From: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> current handling of peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter is based on >>>>>> guessing the VHT160/8080 capability by rx rate. this is wrong and >>>>>> may lead >>>>>> to a non initialized peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter which is >>>>>> required since VHT160 operation mode only supports 2x2 chainmasks >>>>>> in addition the original code >>>>>> initialized the parameter with wrong masked values. >>>>>> This patch uses the peer phymode and peer nss information for >>>>>> correct initialisation of the peer_bw_rxnss_override parameter. >>>>>> if this peer information is not available, we initialize the >>>>>> parameter by minimum nss which is suggested by QCA as temporary >>>>>> workaround according >>>>>> to the QCA sourcecodes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> v2: remove debug messages >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 36 >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 +--- >>>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 14 +++++++++++++- >>>>>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>>> index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c >>>>>> @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct >>>>>> ath10k *ar, >>>>>> if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) >>>>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; >>>>>> >>>>>> - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) >>>>>> + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { >>>>>> arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> >>>>>> /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA >>>>>> * supports VHT. >>>>>> @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void >>>>>> ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, >>>>>> arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( >>>>>> __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); >>>>>> >>>>>> - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d >>>>>> flags 0x%x\n", >>>>>> - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); >>>>>> + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == >>>>>> MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { >>>>>> + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = >>>>>> BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); >>>>>> + } >>>>> >>>>> So, an 80Mhz peer could be 4x4 and could connect to a VHT-160 AP. >>>>> From what I can tell, >>>>> the VHT-160 AP can talk 4x4 @ 80Mhz to the peer in this case, but >>>>> if peer is VHT-160, >>>>> then of course it can only talk at 2x2. >>>>> >>>>> So, I don't think you can just look at the >>>>> peer_num_spatial_streams here. >>>> no? rxnss_override is only taked if peer phymode is vht160 or >>>> vht80_80. vht80 is not considered in that code PEER phy_mode, not >>>> HOST phy_mode >>>> this parameter is a assoc per peer parameter as far as i can say here. >>>> consider that the firmware will accept anything except 0 for >>>> peer_bw_rxnss_override in vht160 operation mode >>>> if a peer is 80 mhz, the code will be skipped here. >>> >>> From what I can tell, this feature is supposed to configure the >>> rate-ctrl in the firmware to know that >>> it can only send 1x1 or 2x2 when sending at 160Mhz, but that it can >>> send at higher NSS if it sends >>> at 80Mhz or lower. >> right. but thats exactly what it should does in case that a peer is >> connecting with vht160 / 80_80 >> and the peer itself does also send his own nss capabilities which is >> used if available. if not ,it uses the fallback. >>> >>> If a 2x2 peer connects to the AP, will it have >>> peer_num_spatial_streams set to 2? >> yes. i had some debug code in my initial early versions. the peer >> does transmit his own nss capabilities. >>> If so, >>> then your code will configure the peer_bw_rxnss_override to indicate >>> it can send at 160Mhz >>> 2x2 as well, right? And if so, then that is incorrect. >> no. since nss_override is only set if peer phymode is 160 mhz as well > > The peer can run at 2x2 80Mhz and 1x1 160Mhz at the same time, so it > can advertise > 2x2 nss and phy-mode of 160Mhz when associating to the 160Mhz AP, but > the peer can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz. There > is no standard way I know of for the peer to tell you specifically > that it can only do > 1x1 at 160Mhz and also 2x2 at 80Mhz in this case. per specification the peer is able to provide max nss to the ap. the rx_nss property is calculated from the mcs rateset provided by the peer by mac80211. this is mcs set provided on on assoc is mandatory. so there is a way the peer can tell you what it supports and this is what is used. if a peer does not provide the mcs rateset (which i have seen for a single marvell client) the fallback mechanism will still work, but just with 1x1. the problem is anything else will crash the firmware. we have to deal with that. That is why this rxnns_override exists, to hack around this problem. i dont think so, because its not just a hack. without providing that parameter the firmware will crash. so its a always required parameter and not just a hack. for sure the firmware can handle it by itself, just someone at qca should start to work on it. but again. my implementation is correct from the information i have out of the qca propertiery wireless driver sources > > Your patch is going to break in this case as far as I can tell. no it isnt. my tests with various different clients from different vendors shows that its working. with 2x2 and 1x1. its all well detected by the code and configured as expected consider that this patch fixes a CRASH. accept that. it wont break. it repairs. > > Thanks, > Ben > >
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index 5be6386ede8f..df79af89ee71 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -2505,8 +2505,9 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw80; - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160) { arg->peer_flags |= ar->wmi.peer_flags->bw160; + } /* Calculate peer NSS capability from VHT capabilities if STA * supports VHT. @@ -2529,22 +2530,25 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(struct ath10k *ar, arg->peer_vht_rates.tx_mcs_set = ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_limit( __le16_to_cpu(vht_cap->vht_mcs.tx_mcs_map), vht_mcs_mask); - ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", - sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80)) { + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); + } - if (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate && - (sta->vht_cap.cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK)) { - switch (arg->peer_vht_rates.rx_max_rate) { - case 1560: - /* Must be 2x2 at 160Mhz is all it can do. */ - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 2; - break; - case 780: - /* Can only do 1x1 at 160Mhz (Long Guard Interval) */ - arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 1; - break; - } + if (arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80) { + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override |= BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(arg->peer_num_spatial_streams); } + + /* In very exceptional conditions it is observed that + * firmware was receiving bw_rxnss_override as 0 for peer from host, and resulting in Target Assert. + * Changing the rxnss_override to minimum nss. This is a temporary WAR. Needs to be fixed + * properly. + */ + if (!arg->peer_num_spatial_streams && (arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT80_80 || arg->peer_phymode == MODE_11AC_VHT160)) { + arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override = BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE; + } + + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_MAC, "mac vht peer %pM max_mpdu %d flags 0x%x\n", + sta->addr, arg->peer_max_mpdu, arg->peer_flags); } static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(struct ath10k *ar, @@ -2696,9 +2700,9 @@ static int ath10k_peer_assoc_prepare(struct ath10k *ar, ath10k_peer_assoc_h_crypto(ar, vif, sta, arg); ath10k_peer_assoc_h_rates(ar, vif, sta, arg); ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht(ar, vif, sta, arg); + ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht(ar, vif, sta, arg); ath10k_peer_assoc_h_qos(ar, vif, sta, arg); - ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(ar, vif, sta, arg); return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c index 2c36256a441d..7d72fdc703c8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c @@ -7212,9 +7212,7 @@ ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_4(struct ath10k *ar, void *buf, ath10k_wmi_peer_assoc_fill_10_2(ar, buf, arg); if (arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override) - cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = - __cpu_to_le32((arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override - 1) | - BIT(PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET)); + cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = __cpu_to_le32(arg->peer_bw_rxnss_override); else cmd->peer_bw_rxnss_override = 0; } diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h index 46ae19bb2c92..1fe0aa5523a6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h @@ -6380,7 +6380,19 @@ struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { __le32 info0; /* WMI_PEER_ASSOC_INFO0_ */ } __packed; -#define PEER_BW_RXNSS_OVERRIDE_OFFSET 31 +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE (1 << 31) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S (0) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M (0x00000007) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S (3) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M (0x00000038) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_M (0x0000003F) + +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) + 1) +#define GET_BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) ((((x) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M) >> BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) + 1) + +/* Values defined to set 160 MHz Bandwidth NSS Mapping into FW*/ +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_160(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_160MHZ_M)) +#define BW_NSS_FWCONF_80_80(x) (BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_ENABLE | (((x - 1) << BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_S) & BW_NSS_FWCONF_MAP_80_80MHZ_M)) struct wmi_10_4_peer_assoc_complete_cmd { struct wmi_10_2_peer_assoc_complete_cmd cmd;