diff mbox

[v3,2/2] btrfs: sysfs: Add entry which shows rmdir(2) can work for subvolume

Message ID 20e797cb-2f49-3248-768e-57afe175bad4@jp.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Misono Tomohiro May 17, 2018, 5:24 a.m. UTC
Deletion of a subvolume by rmdir(2) has become allowed by the
'commit cd2decf640b1 ("btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty
subvolume")'.

It is a kind of new feature and this commits add a sysfs entry
  /sys/fs/btrfs/features/rmdir_subvol
to indicate the availability of the feature so that a user program
(e.g. xfstests) can detect it.

Prior to this commit, all entry in /sys/fs/btrfs/features is a feature
which depends on feature bits of superblock (i.e. each feature affects
on-disk format) and managed by attribute_group "btrfs_feature_attr_group".
For each fs, entries in /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features indicate which
features are enabled (or can be changed online) for the fs.

However, rmdir_subvol feature only depends on kernel modules. Therefore
new attribute_group "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" is introduced and
sysfs_merge_group() is used to share /sys/fs/btrfs/features directory.
Features in "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" won't be listed in each
/sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
Hi David,

Sorry for the misunderstanding.
How about this version which uses /sys/fs/btrfs/features
while using different attribute_group for static features.

Thanks,

 fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

Comments

David Sterba May 17, 2018, 4:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:24:51PM +0900, Misono Tomohiro wrote:
> Deletion of a subvolume by rmdir(2) has become allowed by the
> 'commit cd2decf640b1 ("btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty
> subvolume")'.
> 
> It is a kind of new feature and this commits add a sysfs entry
>   /sys/fs/btrfs/features/rmdir_subvol
> to indicate the availability of the feature so that a user program
> (e.g. xfstests) can detect it.
> 
> Prior to this commit, all entry in /sys/fs/btrfs/features is a feature
> which depends on feature bits of superblock (i.e. each feature affects
> on-disk format) and managed by attribute_group "btrfs_feature_attr_group".
> For each fs, entries in /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features indicate which
> features are enabled (or can be changed online) for the fs.
> 
> However, rmdir_subvol feature only depends on kernel modules. Therefore
> new attribute_group "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" is introduced and
> sysfs_merge_group() is used to share /sys/fs/btrfs/features directory.
> Features in "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" won't be listed in each
> /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> Hi David,
> 
> Sorry for the misunderstanding.

No problem.

> How about this version which uses /sys/fs/btrfs/features
> while using different attribute_group for static features.

Perfect, that's what I had in mind, added to misc-next, thanks.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
index 217d401fe8ae..ae6003b34c76 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
@@ -210,12 +210,40 @@  static struct attribute *btrfs_supported_feature_attrs[] = {
 	NULL
 };
 
+/*
+ * Features which depend on feature bits and may differ between each fs.
+ * /sys/fs/btrfs/features lists all capable features of this kernel
+ * while /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features shows features of the fs which are
+ * enabled or can be changed online
+ */
 static const struct attribute_group btrfs_feature_attr_group = {
 	.name = "features",
 	.is_visible = btrfs_feature_visible,
 	.attrs = btrfs_supported_feature_attrs,
 };
 
+static ssize_t rmdir_subvol_show(struct kobject *kobj,
+				 struct kobj_attribute *ka, char *buf)
+{
+	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0\n");
+}
+BTRFS_ATTR(static_feature, rmdir_subvol, rmdir_subvol_show);
+
+static struct attribute *btrfs_supported_static_feature_attrs[] = {
+	BTRFS_ATTR_PTR(static_feature, rmdir_subvol),
+	NULL
+};
+
+/*
+ * Features which only depend on a kernel version.
+ * These are listed in /sys/fs/btrfs/features along with
+ * btrfs_feature_attr_group
+ */
+static const struct attribute_group btrfs_static_feature_attr_group = {
+	.name = "features",
+	.attrs = btrfs_supported_static_feature_attrs,
+};
+
 static ssize_t btrfs_show_u64(u64 *value_ptr, spinlock_t *lock, char *buf)
 {
 	u64 val;
@@ -901,8 +929,15 @@  int __init btrfs_init_sysfs(void)
 	ret = sysfs_create_group(&btrfs_kset->kobj, &btrfs_feature_attr_group);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out2;
+	ret = sysfs_merge_group(&btrfs_kset->kobj,
+				&btrfs_static_feature_attr_group);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out3;
 
 	return 0;
+
+out3:
+	sysfs_remove_group(&btrfs_kset->kobj, &btrfs_feature_attr_group);
 out2:
 	debugfs_remove_recursive(btrfs_debugfs_root_dentry);
 out1:
@@ -913,6 +948,8 @@  int __init btrfs_init_sysfs(void)
 
 void __cold btrfs_exit_sysfs(void)
 {
+	sysfs_unmerge_group(&btrfs_kset->kobj,
+			    &btrfs_static_feature_attr_group);
 	sysfs_remove_group(&btrfs_kset->kobj, &btrfs_feature_attr_group);
 	kset_unregister(btrfs_kset);
 	debugfs_remove_recursive(btrfs_debugfs_root_dentry);