| Message ID | 20180326121406.14548-3-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 03/26/2018 05:44 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> > Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain<nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Nayna Jain<nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks & Regards, - Nayna > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > index 7665661d9230..7bffd0fd1dca 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > @@ -844,30 +844,35 @@ static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > /** > * tpm2_probe() - probe TPM 2.0 > - * @chip: TPM chip to use > + * @chip: a TPM chip to probe > * > - * Return: < 0 error and 0 on success. > + * Return: 0 on success, > + * -errno otherwise > * > - * Send idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether TPM 2.0 chip replied based on > - * the reply tag. > + * Send an idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether there is TPM2 chip in the > + * other end based on the response tag. The flag TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 is set if > + * this is the case. > */ > int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > - struct tpm2_cmd cmd; > + struct tpm_output_header *out; > + struct tpm_buf buf; > int rc; > > - cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header; > - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); > - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100); > - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1); > - > - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL); > - if (rc < 0) > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY); > + if (rc) > return rc; > - > - if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) > - chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; > - > + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); > + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS); > + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1); > + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL); > + /* We ignore TPM return codes on purpose. */ > + if (rc >= 0) { > + out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data; > + if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) > + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; > + } > + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon Mar 26 18, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing TPM >commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it. > >Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> >Acked-by: Jay Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com> >--- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >index 7665661d9230..7bffd0fd1dca 100644 >--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c >@@ -844,30 +844,35 @@ static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > /** > * tpm2_probe() - probe TPM 2.0 >- * @chip: TPM chip to use >+ * @chip: a TPM chip to probe > * >- * Return: < 0 error and 0 on success. >+ * Return: 0 on success, >+ * -errno otherwise > * >- * Send idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether TPM 2.0 chip replied based on >- * the reply tag. >+ * Send an idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether there is TPM2 chip in the >+ * other end based on the response tag. The flag TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 is set if >+ * this is the case. > */ > int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { >- struct tpm2_cmd cmd; >+ struct tpm_output_header *out; >+ struct tpm_buf buf; > int rc; > >- cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header; >- cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); >- cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100); >- cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1); >- >- rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL); >- if (rc < 0) >+ rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY); >+ if (rc) > return rc; >- >- if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) >- chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; >- >+ tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); >+ tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS); >+ tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1); >+ rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL); >+ /* We ignore TPM return codes on purpose. */ >+ if (rc >= 0) { >+ out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data; >+ if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) >+ chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; >+ } >+ tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe); >-- >2.15.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c index 7665661d9230..7bffd0fd1dca 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c @@ -844,30 +844,35 @@ static int tpm2_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip) /** * tpm2_probe() - probe TPM 2.0 - * @chip: TPM chip to use + * @chip: a TPM chip to probe * - * Return: < 0 error and 0 on success. + * Return: 0 on success, + * -errno otherwise * - * Send idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether TPM 2.0 chip replied based on - * the reply tag. + * Send an idempotent TPM 2.0 command and see whether there is TPM2 chip in the + * other end based on the response tag. The flag TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 is set if + * this is the case. */ int tpm2_probe(struct tpm_chip *chip) { - struct tpm2_cmd cmd; + struct tpm_output_header *out; + struct tpm_buf buf; int rc; - cmd.header.in = tpm2_get_tpm_pt_header; - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.cap_id = cpu_to_be32(TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_id = cpu_to_be32(0x100); - cmd.params.get_tpm_pt_in.property_cnt = cpu_to_be32(1); - - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), 0, 0, NULL); - if (rc < 0) + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_GET_CAPABILITY); + if (rc) return rc; - - if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) - chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; - + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM2_CAP_TPM_PROPERTIES); + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, TPM_PT_TOTAL_COMMANDS); + tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, 1); + rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, buf.data, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0, NULL); + /* We ignore TPM return codes on purpose. */ + if (rc >= 0) { + out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data; + if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS) + chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2; + } + tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);