| Message ID | 1527262541-13964-1-git-send-email-ayan.halder@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Ayan, On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: >If a plane supports a pixel format and the framebuffer does not pass any >modifiers, then drm_plane_check_pixel_format() should always return true >for the given format regardless of whether the plane supports any >modifiers or not. > >Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >index 6d2a6e4..873c084 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c >@@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ int drm_plane_check_pixel_format(struct drm_plane *plane, > if (!plane->modifier_count) > return 0; > >+ if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) >+ return 0; >+ There can be drivers which have formats which are only supported when a modifier is used - so I don't think this check is right to have in the core. Drivers need to check if they support the format with no modifier (same as DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) in their format_mod_supported() callback. Thanks, -Brian > for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) { > if (modifier == plane->modifiers[i]) > break; >-- >2.7.4 >
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: > If a plane supports a pixel format and the framebuffer does not pass any > modifiers, then drm_plane_check_pixel_format() should always return true > for the given format regardless of whether the plane supports any > modifiers or not. If your plane supports DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR then you should add that to the plane's modifier list. > > Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > index 6d2a6e4..873c084 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > @@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ int drm_plane_check_pixel_format(struct drm_plane *plane, > if (!plane->modifier_count) > return 0; > > + if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) > + return 0; > + > for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) { > if (modifier == plane->modifiers[i]) > break; > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:48:59PM +0100, Brian Starkey wrote: > Hi Ayan, > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote: > >If a plane supports a pixel format and the framebuffer does not pass any > >modifiers, then drm_plane_check_pixel_format() should always return true > >for the given format regardless of whether the plane supports any > >modifiers or not. > > > >Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com> > >--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > >index 6d2a6e4..873c084 100644 > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c > >@@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ int drm_plane_check_pixel_format(struct drm_plane *plane, > > if (!plane->modifier_count) > > return 0; > > > >+ if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) > >+ return 0; > >+ > > There can be drivers which have formats which are only supported when > a modifier is used - so I don't think this check is right to have in > the core. > > Drivers need to check if they support the format with no modifier > (same as DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) in their format_mod_supported() > callback. BTW I tried to make the core hide the "did the request have modifiers or not" difference as much as possible, and to validate that there is at least one plane that can use the created fb: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39814/ Not sure we ever figured out a good solution in the end, but at least Eric's approach in https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40133/ would avoid some of the problems I was having in my attempts. I guess I should try to revisit that patchset and see if I can make it less objectionable this time around. > > Thanks, > -Brian > > > for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) { > > if (modifier == plane->modifiers[i]) > > break; > >-- > >2.7.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c index 6d2a6e4..873c084 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c @@ -564,6 +564,9 @@ int drm_plane_check_pixel_format(struct drm_plane *plane, if (!plane->modifier_count) return 0; + if (modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE) + return 0; + for (i = 0; i < plane->modifier_count; i++) { if (modifier == plane->modifiers[i]) break;
If a plane supports a pixel format and the framebuffer does not pass any modifiers, then drm_plane_check_pixel_format() should always return true for the given format regardless of whether the plane supports any modifiers or not. Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.halder@arm.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)