| Message ID | 1526566904-24514-4-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Amélie On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote: > Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> > --- > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > index 89167cd..f990335 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m > CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m > CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y > CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y > +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y > CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y > CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y > CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y > Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ? Regards Alex
Hi Alex On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Amélie > > On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote: >> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> index 89167cd..f990335 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m >> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m >> CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y >> CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y >> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y >> CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y >> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y >> CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y >> > > Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be > defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ? > You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT patches as they are ? Regards, Amelie
On 06/26/2018 01:47 PM, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote: > Hi Alex > > On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: >> Hi Amélie >> >> On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote: >>> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >>> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >>> index 89167cd..f990335 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >>> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m >>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m >>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y >>> CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y >>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y >>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y >>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y >>> CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y >>> >> >> Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be >> defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ? >> > > You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend > the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT > patches as they are ? > No, you can just resend this one. I will take DT part from this version. Regards Alex > Regards, > Amelie
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 89167cd..f990335 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC. Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)