diff mbox

scsi: switch to scsi-mq by default

Message ID 20180704085356.10888-1-jthumshirn@suse.de (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Johannes Thumshirn July 4, 2018, 8:53 a.m. UTC
It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default
from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi:
default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and
performance problems it had been reverted again with commit
cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq"").

In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can
re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Acked-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>

---
Changes since RFC:
- Improve Changelog as Bart suggested
- Collect Acks and Reviews
---
 drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Martin K. Petersen July 11, 2018, 2:52 a.m. UTC | #1
Johannes,

> It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default
> from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi:
> default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and
> performance problems it had been reverted again with commit
> cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq"").
>
> In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
> improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can
> re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.

Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks!
Adrian Hunter July 11, 2018, 8:31 a.m. UTC | #2
On 11/07/18 05:52, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Johannes,
> 
>> It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default
>> from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi:
>> default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and
>> performance problems it had been reverted again with commit
>> cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq"").
>>
>> In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
>> improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can
>> re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.
> 
> Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks!
> 

But there is no runtime pm support, is there?  I tried enabling runtime PM
for UFS SCSI devices with scsi-mq and it didn't work, which is a regression.
Ming Lei July 11, 2018, 4:35 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/07/18 05:52, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Johannes,
>>
>>> It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default
>>> from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi:
>>> default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and
>>> performance problems it had been reverted again with commit
>>> cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq"").
>>>
>>> In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
>>> improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can
>>> re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.
>>
>> Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks!
>>
>
> But there is no runtime pm support, is there?  I tried enabling runtime PM
> for UFS SCSI devices with scsi-mq and it didn't work, which is a regression.

I just posted one RFC patchset for supporting runtime PM on scsi_mq, and
looks it works in my test on usb-storage.

https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=153132657922233&w=2

thanks,
Ming Lei
Adrian Hunter July 12, 2018, 6:17 a.m. UTC | #4
On 11/07/18 19:35, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 11/07/18 05:52, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>
>>> Johannes,
>>>
>>>> It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default
>>>> from legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi:
>>>> default to scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and
>>>> performance problems it had been reverted again with commit
>>>> cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default to scsi-mq"").
>>>>
>>>> In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
>>>> improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can
>>>> re-enable scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.
>>>
>>> Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks!
>>>
>>
>> But there is no runtime pm support, is there?  I tried enabling runtime PM
>> for UFS SCSI devices with scsi-mq and it didn't work, which is a regression.
> 
> I just posted one RFC patchset for supporting runtime PM on scsi_mq, and
> looks it works in my test on usb-storage.
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=153132657922233&w=2

Cool, please cc me on the next revision of your patch set.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
index 35c909bbf8ba..bd115bab162e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@  config SCSI_NETLINK
 
 config SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT
 	bool "SCSI: use blk-mq I/O path by default"
+	default y
 	depends on SCSI
 	---help---
 	  This option enables the new blk-mq based I/O path for SCSI